Flow, control structure

Automatic systems of flow control structure are made of simple adjustment depending on the error, such a structure is used only to maintain a flow to a specified value or as a secondary loop in a control structure that changes in cascade the flow with the level or concentration (Borne et al., 1993). 

In particular, if changes in fresh feed composition load the reactor excessively —that is, beyond its ability to provide the required conversion—then the separator/ recycle system will be called on to make up the deficiency. For the case where extra reactor capacity is available through an increase in the reactor level, the particular choice of level/flow control structure within the recycle loop can radically affect plant gains (sensitivities). In the following, we assume that the reactor design is fixed and its level is set at less than full capacity. The question to be considered is how alternative designs of the level and flow loops mitigate the effect of fresh feed flow rate or composition disturbances. 

Luyben (1994) has investigated these and similar relations for more complex reaction kinetics over a wide range of the disturbances (Fq and zo)- The snowball effect is not an artifact of the simplifying assumptions employed (e.g., perfect composition control in the column). It appears to be a general effect in recycle systems that can arise from inadequate reactor holdup or a particular choice of the plant inventory/flow control structure. However, before attempting to generalize, we look at two other control structures and their sensitivity characteristics. 

MATLAB has several flow control structures that allow the program to make decisions or control its execution sequence. These structures are for, if, while, and switch which we describe briefly below ... 

Lua has several flow control structures that have similar meanings to fliose in other languages. The most important are ... 

Software to predict the properties of formulated products is made more powerful by a recursive procedure which can use formulas stored in files as raw materials. Particular care must be taken with program flow control and data structures for the recursion to be effective. This paper illustrates these issues using an example derived from a working formulation system for coatings development. 

Recursive procedures demand special attention to flow control and data structures. For instance, the flow control within the procedure must correctly handle an error, say missing file information or inconsistent data, that is discovered several iterations deep. Should the procedure break and return to the previous level only Should it force return to the level of the original invocation of the procedure Should it allow an interactive user a choice of supplying missing data, and if so, on any level of iteration If files are opened within the procedures, should they be closed when a recursive call is needed, or are new channel numbers to be requested, using up system resources ... 

These and other issues about flow control become critical as real-world features to enhance ease of use are added to a system, features we do not illustrate in our example. We will instead focus on complications of the data structure that are evident even in our simple procedure. 

The surface of the micro channels was anodically oxidized to create a pore structure and thereafter wet-chemically impregnated [61]. The liquid reaction solution was fed by an HPLC pump hydrogen was metered by a mass-flow controller. Pressure was kept constant... 

This flow scheme structurally checks whether or not a control element is working effectively. This flow scheme is used as a guideline on each successive hierarchical control level (operational, tactical, strategic), starting on the operational level. 

One of the most common errors in laying out a control structure for a plant with multiple units in series is the use of PI level controllers. If P controllers are used, the process flows rise or fall slowly down the train of units with no overshoot of flow rates. Liquid levels rise if flows increase and fall if flows decrease. Levels are not maintained at setpoints. See Fig. 7.14. 

For example, in a distillation column the manipulated variables could be the flow rates of reflux and vapor boilup R — V) to control distillate and bottoms compositions. This choice gives one possible control stmcture. Alternatively we could have chosen to manipulate the flow rates of distillate and vapor boilup D V). This yields another control structure for the same basic distillation process. 

Now, from its essential notion, we have the feedback interconnection implies that a portion of the information from a given system returns back into the system. In this chapter, two processes are discussed in context of the feedback interconnection. The former is a typical feedback control systems, and consists in a bioreactor for waste water treatment. The bioreactor is controlled by robust asymptotic approach [33], [34]. The first study case in this chapter is focused in the bioreactor temperature. A heat exchanger is interconnected with the bioreactor in order to lead temperature into the digester around a constant value for avoiding stress in bacteria. The latter process is a fluid mechanics one, and has feedforward control structure. The process was constructed to study kinetics and dynamics of the gas-liquid flow in vertical column. In this second system, the interconnection is related to recycling liquid flow. The experiment comprises several superficial gas velocity. Thus, the control acting on the gas-liquid column can be seen as an open-loop system where the control variable is the velocity of the gas entering into the column. There is no measurements of the gas velocity to compute a fluid dynamics... 

The sample treatment is executed as follows The sample is located inside the chamber. The SFM scanner is retracted by about 8 mm from the sample. Then the chamber is closed by the lid. In order to anneal the sample successfully, we perform the treatment in a hermetically sealed reactor chamber. The sample is exposed to chloroform vapor while a voltage is applied across the electrodes on the glass substrate. The gas flow rate through the system is controlled by mass flow controllers and additionally checked by a flow meter installed at the outlet of the chamber. After a certain annealing time, the solvent is removed with a flow of pure argon while the voltage is still applied in order to quench the structure in the presence of the electric field. Subsequently the lid is opened, the voltage is switched off, and the SFM scanner is moved towards the sample. This procedure is repeated several times. The accomplishable position stability as a key performance feature of the quasi in situ SFM amounts to almost the same value as reported in [32] (low pressure plasma treatments). The increase in lateral drift is only about 23 nm per process step. The... 

More than 100 micro structured devices are listed on the homepage of the pChemTec consortium [24]. The devices cover physical applications such as flow distribution, mixing, heat transfer, phase transfer, emulsification and suspension, as well as chemical applications such as chemical and biochemical processing. Some separation units such as membrane separation and capillary electrophoresis are also offered. Control devices such as valves, micro pumps for product analysis and mass flow controllers supplement the catalog. 

Some support structures are also included for detachably retaining the various components of the system. Preferably the support structure can be of the assembly board type , which provides prearranged flow channels and connector ports. The desired components of the system can be fastened into these connectors by pins. The flow control system that makes up the ICS system can include pumps, flow channels, manifolds, flow restrictors, valves, etc. These components are equipped with the necessary fittings that allow them to be sealed with the prearranged or selectively located flow channels or connectors. The flow system can also include detachable mixing devices, e.g., static or ultrasonic, or with a chip-like design. The reaction units, whether chip-like or not, can be of thermal, electrochemical, photochemical or pressure type [84]. 

Let us change the control structure to one in which the fresh feedstream FB0 is simply flow-controlled. This means that if an increase in temperature produces a large increase in... 

When reactor capacity is limited by heat removal, an often-recommended control structure is to run with maximum coolant flow and manipulate feed flowrate to control reactor temperature (Tr F0 control). This control scheme has the potential to achieve the highest possible production rate. However, if the feed temperature is lower than the reactor temperature, the transfer function between temperature and feed flowrate contains a positive zero, which degrades dynamic performance, as we demonstrate quantitatively in this section. The choice of a control structure for this process presents an example of the often encountered conflict between steady-state economics and dynamic controllability. 

The performance of the convention control structure, in which cooling water flow is manipulated to control temperature, is shown in Figure 3.52. The disturbance is the same increase in cooling water temperature. Feed flowrate is constant. The cooling water flowrate more than doubles to control reactor temperature, but the temperature is returned to the desired value in about 2 h. The peak deviation in temperature is less than 0.6 K. Controller settings are those given in Table 3.2 for the 95% conversion case with a 330 K reactor temperature (the integral time is 50 min). 

The disturbance considered is a step increase in the flowrate of the ethylene feed. We want to increase the benzene feed whenever the ethylene feed is increased, so a ratio control structure is installed. Figure 3.89 shows a Mulitply block selected from the list of ControlModels, dropped on the flowsheet, and renamed ratio. A control signal is attached to the FE stream and connected to ratio.Inputl, as shown in the upper window of Figure 3.90. Another control signal is attached from the output of the multiply block to the setpoint of the benzene flow controller. Clicking the ratio icon, clicking the right... 

The control structure shown in Figure 6.57 is installed on the flowsheet. The feed is flow-controlled. The outlet temperature is controlled by manipulating the coolant flowrate. Note that the OP signal is sent to both of the control valves on the coolant stream, opening and closing them simultaneously. The setup works in the simulations, but it is not what would be used in a real physical system. A pressure-driven simulation in Aspen Plus requires that valves be placed on both the inlet and outlet coolant streams. In a real system, the cooling water would be drawn from a supply header, which operates a fixed pressure. A single control valve would be used, either on the inlet or on the outlet, to manipulate the flowrate of coolant. 

The performance of this control structure, which does not use the furnace, is shown in Figure 7.31. At 0.1 hours, the feed composition is changed from 5 to 7.5 mol% chlorine. The reactor outlet temperature climbs because of the increase in reaction heat generation. The hotter gas entering the FEHE raises the temperature of exit stream, which raises the temperature of the mixture. The temperature controller increases the bypass flow to hold the reactor inlet temperature at 400 K. 

Flow switches using fluidics in small Reynolds number are fabricated. The principle of the flow switch is shown in Fig. 4 [21]. Mixing of the sample stream and carrier liquid is negligible when the contact area is small and the contact time within subsecond range. The width of the sample stream is controlled by two carrier flows. This structure can be applied for a valveless sample injection in FIA and for sorting of particles and living cells in flow cytometry. A flow switch having 5 outlets has also been obtained by this method. 

---