Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flame temperature, actual

The insensitivity of adiabatic flame temperature to heat of combustion does not necessarily apply to the operational flame temperature, T, which is the flame temperature found in an actual furnace (remembering that this refers to some average temperature). The higher excess air requirements at higher C/H ratios coupled with greater thermal loads on longer flames generally results in markedly lower operational temperatures as the C/H ratio increases. [Pg.142]

Actual temperatures in practical flames are lower than calculated values as a result of the heat losses by radiation, thermal conduction, and diffusion. At high temperatures, dissociation of products of combustion into species such as OH, O, and H reduces the theoretical flame temperature (7). Increasing the pressure tends to suppress dissociation of the products and thus generally raises the adiabatic flame temperature (4). [Pg.517]

Dicyanoacetylene, 2-hiitynedinitri1e, is obtained from dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate by ammonolysis to the diamide, which is dehydrated with phosphoms pentoxide (44). It bums in oxygen to give a flame with a temperature of 5260 K, the hottest flame temperature known (45). Alcohols and amines add readily to its acetylenic bond (46). It is a powerhil dienophile in the Diels-Alder reaction it adds to many dienes at room temperature, and at 180°C actually adds 1,4- to benzene to give the bicyclo adduct (7) [18341 -68-9] C QHgN2 (47). [Pg.405]

Figure 10-24 shows a schematic of an actual dry low emission NO combustor used by ALSTOM in their large turbines. With the flame temperature being much closer to the lean limit than in a conventional combustion system, some action has to be taken when the engine load is reduced to prevent flame out. If no action were taken flame-out would occur since the mixture strength would become too lean to burn. [Pg.399]

The emissive power of a fireball, however, will depend on the actual distribution of flame temperatures, partial pressure of combustion products, geometry of the combustion zone, and absorption of radiation in the fireball itself. The emissive power ( ) is therefore lower than the maximum emissive power (E ) of the black body radiation ... [Pg.167]

The solid fuel composition is, therefore, concerned with the pursuit of higher I p involving both flame temperature elevation and molecular weight reduction. Concomitantly, it is desirable to have high heat of combustion, which also dictates the combustion chamber temperature. The actual composition is, therefore, set on the basis of the energy quantum inherent in the various constituents. [Pg.706]

Adiabatic Reaction Temperature (T ). The concept of adiabatic or theoretical reaction temperature (T j) plays an important role in the design of chemical reactors, gas furnaces, and other process equipment to handle highly exothermic reactions such as combustion. T is defined as the final temperature attained by the reaction mixture at the completion of a chemical reaction carried out under adiabatic conditions in a closed system at constant pressure. Theoretically, this is the maximum temperature achieved by the products when stoichiometric quantities of reactants are completely converted into products in an adiabatic reactor. In general, T is a function of the initial temperature (T) of the reactants and their relative amounts as well as the presence of any nonreactive (inert) materials. T is also dependent on the extent of completion of the reaction. In actual experiments, it is very unlikely that the theoretical maximum values of T can be realized, but the calculated results do provide an idealized basis for comparison of the thermal effects resulting from exothermic reactions. Lower feed temperatures (T), presence of inerts and excess reactants, and incomplete conversion tend to reduce the value of T. The term theoretical or adiabatic flame temperature (T,, ) is preferred over T in dealing exclusively with the combustion of fuels. [Pg.359]

However, as the temperature of the flue gas decreases, as heat is extracted, the dissociation reactions reverse and the heat is released. Thus, although theoretical flame temperature does not reflect the true flame temperature, it does provide a convenient reference to indicate how much heat is actually released by combustion as the flue gas is cooled. Figure 15.21 shows the flue gas starting from the theoretical flame temperature. This is cooled... [Pg.352]

The terrperature of the hot layer in the corridor is shown in Figure 7. In the corridor, the hot gas is untenable for an upright person next to the open fire room door after about 160 seconds. After about four minutes, the radiation from the hot layer would be too high to permit a person to pass. Furthermore, in actual fact, the temperature would be higher than that calculated at the fire room door, because of the fuel which would burn in the corridor, thus providing flame temperature radiation in addition to the hot layer temperature computed here. [Pg.75]

It is interesting to note that stratified combustible gas mixtures can exist in tunnel-like conditions. The condition in a coal mine tunnel is an excellent example. The marsh gas (methane) is lighter than air and accumulates at the ceiling. Thus a stratified air-methane mixture exists. Experiments have shown that under the conditions described the flame propagation rate is very much faster than the stoichiometric laminar flame speed. In laboratory experiments simulating the mine-like conditions the actual rates were found to be affected by the laboratory simulated tunnel length and depth. In effect, the expansion of the reaction products of these type laboratory experiments drives the flame front developed. The overall effect is similar in context to the soap bubble type flame experiments discussed in Section C5c. In the soap bubble flame experiment measurements, the ambient condition is about 300 K and the stoichiometric flame temperature of the flame products for most hydrocarbon fuels... [Pg.211]

It is now possible to calculate the burning rate of a droplet under the quasisteady conditions outlined and to estimate, as well, the flame temperature and position however, the only means to estimate the burning time of an actual droplet is to calculate the evaporation coefficient for burning, f3. From the mass burning results obtained, f3 may be readily determined. For a liquid droplet, the relation... [Pg.358]

Compare your Bunsen burner flame temperature with the actual... [Pg.35]

Flame temperatures can be measured directly, using special high-temperature optical methods. They can also be calculated (estimated) using heat of reaction data and thermochemical values for heat of fusion and vaporization, heat capacity, and transition temperatures. Calculated values tend to be higher than the actual experimental results, due to heat loss to the surroundings as well as the endothermic decomposition of some of the reaction products. Details regarding these calculations, with several examples, have been published [5]. [Pg.69]

A pyrotechnic reaction generates a substantial quantity of heat, and the actual flame temperature reached by these mixtures is an area of study that has been attacked from both the experimental and theoretical directions. [Pg.173]

It is found experimentally that limit mixtures, incapable of supporting combustion waves, nevertheless have theoretical thermodynamic flame temperatures of the order of 1000° C. or more. It is, therefore, not immediately clear why combustion waves, albeit slowly propagating, should not develop in mixtures possessing such substantial chemical enthalpy. The question arises whether the observed limits of flammability are true limits or whether such mixtures are actually capable of supporting combustion waves but are prevented from doing so by experimental limitations. Experimentalists believe that the limits are true. On the other hand, no theoretical criterion for the limit is obtained from the steady-state equations of the combustion wave. That is, the equations describe combustion waves without differentiating between mixtures that are known to be flammable and mixtures that are known to be nonflammable. Therefore, for nonflammable mixtures the combustion wave becomes unstable to perturbations and thus disappears (7). Conversely, for flammable mixtures the combustion wave can overcome perturbations—i.e., it returns to the steady state after being perturbed. [Pg.18]

Thus, at high I, the pair population is a considerably smaller fraction of the total OH population than the initial fraction given by a Boltzmann distribution at the flame temperature. For example, for the nominal values of 14 and 0.4 A for Oq and Oy, the infinite-intensity fraction is < 1% of the total while the zero-intensity value is 4%. This result is generally valid for the entire range of parameters inserted into the model, which represent physically realistic energy transfer rates. However, the precise numerical values depend sensitively on the actual parameters inserted. These facts form the central conclusions of this study (4). A steady state model with no dummy level and a different set of rate constants and level structure (5) shows some similar features. [Pg.144]

Since Qr > AH, the actual value of the flame temperature is higher than the 3000°K. assumed initially. It is logical to choose Tc = 3250°K. as the next trial value, because the equilibrium constants are tabulated by NBS with this temperature interval. At this temperature, the values of the equilibrium constants are ... [Pg.92]

Deflagration Pressure The increase in pressure in a vessel from a deflagration results from an increase in temperature the actual maximum flame temperature for propane, for example, is 1925°C (3497°F). No significant increase in moles of gas to cause pressure buildiip results from combustion of propane in air. [Pg.2072]

We are now equipped to determine what is called the adiabatic reaction temperature. This is the temperature obtained inside the process when (1) the reaction is carried out under adiabatic conditions, that is, there is no heat interchange between the container in which the reaction is taking place and the surroundings and (2) when there are no other effects present, such as electrical effects, work, ionization, free radical formation, and so on. In calculations of flame temperatures for combustion reactions, the adiabatic reaction temperature assumes complete combustion. Equilibrium considerations may dictate less than complete combustion for an actual case. For example, the adiabatic flame temperature for the combustion of CH4 with theoretical air has been calculated to be 2010 C allowing for incomplete combustion, it would be 1920 C. The actual temperature when measured is 1885 C. [Pg.464]


See other pages where Flame temperature, actual is mentioned: [Pg.189]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.86]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.86 ]




SEARCH



Actual

Actual temperature

Actuality

Flame temperature, actual maximum

© 2024 chempedia.info