Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Plant operation financial

The Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape, Division Waste, is gratefully acknowledged for financial and scientific support of this study. The authors are grateful to the companies and plant operators for their collaboration, the sampling of the BA, and the supply of the requested information. [Pg.421]

When the new catalyst charge does not meet these expectations, significant financial losses are incurred. Technical efforts are initiated to investigate the causes of nonconformance. Feedstock properties, start-up procedures, plant operations, and catalyst properties usually are being considered. [Pg.388]

The integrated implementation plan of corrective actions and/or safety improvements and the summary report should be subject to approval by the senior management of the plant operating organization, who should commit the necessary human and financial resources to implement the planned corrective actions and/or safety improvements according to a reasonable schedule. These approved documents should then be submitted to the regulatory body for review and final decision in accordance with national requirements and nuclear law. [Pg.32]

However, the financial analysis is simpler than the actual application. The problem is to establish the annual savings accurately and meaningfully, and plant operators are, out of experience, inclined to be sceptical about claimed savings - in effect, to apply a further discount to them. [Pg.80]

The document and other item numbers may have to conform to client requirements for project tracking and audit, and much of the documentation and its indexing remain important for plant operation, maintenance, and financial control. The client use of project documentation is an inevitable aspect of any project numbering system. Even if the solution adopted is merely a duplicate set of numbers for postproject use, this can consume a lot of effort this is minimized if the duplicate numbering is planned from the outset. [Pg.244]

USEC has released the information that its centrifuge rotor will be 40 high, about 2 in diameter, and made of tightly woven carbon fibers. The rofafional speed remains a secret. The machine capacity will be 350 SWUs per year. The announced total centrifuge plant output will be 3.8 million SWUs per year. Complete plant operation was scheduled to be achieved in 2012. Financial and technical problems significantly delayed the program. With the assistance of DOE the lead cascade was completed and successfully operated in 2013. However, the program is still under the cascade license which does not allow for commercial operation. [Pg.344]

The abovementioned battery plant business strategy is designed to reduce customer financial risk for the market conditions found in developing countries and/or for merchant plants operating outside the regulatory compact in developed countries. But it would require the supplier to take on the increase in risk attendant to emplacement of economy of scale reactor production factories and regional fuel cycle centres. [Pg.666]

In July 1983, after lengthy negotiations, CWCGP concluded a price support agreement with the Synthetic Fuels Corporation. The SFC price support was complex and involved extensive negotiations. The complexity probably reflected the fact that SFC had never granted price support before and was reluctant to support the electricity price directly. However, the SFC financial assistance is only a product price support SFC gives financial support only when the plant operates successfully. [Pg.93]

SFC Support. Like the Cool Water project, the Destec LGTI project also received support from the U.S. government. However, SFCs financial assistance is only a price support for the coal-derived gas. Therefore, SFC gives financial support only when the plant operates successfully and natural gas prices are low. [Pg.98]

This development of costs triggered dwindling political support. And an additional costs increase could already been foreseen for the nuclear commissioning phase still to come, for the financial risk-sharing contract to be agreed on by the Federal h stiy of Research and Development and the utilities for the later plant operation. The operating costs were planned to be recovered by selling the electricity. [Pg.99]

Even though nuclear plant operations carry sizeable financial risks as well as grave career risks, sufficient co-owner-CEO involvement does not always exist. As a JNOC formation decision could well be a "bet your company" decision, the CEO (together with his or her Board of Directors) is the principal executive to be entrusted with this heady responsibility. [Pg.316]

In industrialized countries, the market deregulation and resulting competition drives the utilities toward shorter time of capital recovery and lower financial risks, which could perhaps be achieved by enabling the incremental capacity addition to a network that would match the incremental increase of demand. On the other hand, an essential simplification of plant operating and maintenance requirements may be requested to justify for, say, the reduced number of control rooms at a site with several modular reactors. [Pg.3]

In drafting and reviewing both sets of requirements, many utilities of Asia, Europe and the USA have taken part. Utilities consider it essential that they play a major role in developing requirements for future reactors and in harmonizing these requirements within the utility community. Utilities will hold the ultimate safety and financial responsibility for these future plants, and hold the first-hand operating experience from current plant operations that they are now applying to the requirements for the design of future plants. Therefore, these utility requirements efforts can be seen as a very important contribution to worldwide harmonization of safety requirements for future NPPs. [Pg.10]

The activities of Levels 1, 2, and 3a in Fig. 1.8, are required for all manufacturing plants, while the activities in Levels 3b-5 are optional but can be very profitable. The decision to implement one or more of these higher-level activities depends very much on the application and the company. The decision hinges strongly on economic considerations (for example, a cost/bene-fit analysis), and company priorities for their limited resources, both human and financial. The immediacy of the activity decreases from Level 1 to Level 5 in the hierarchy. However, the amount of analysis and the computational requirements increase from the lowest level to the highest level. The process control activities at different levels should be carefully coordinated and require information transfer from one level to the next. The successful implementation of these process control activities is a critical factor in making plant operation as profitable as possible. [Pg.9]

For various reasons, including financial ones, the United States was slower than Japan and Europe to install continuous slab casters for the production of sheet. Electric melters cast billets continuously from about 1975 onward. Casting was done cmdely at first but the sophistication increased rapidly, culminating in the operation of a thin-slab caster at one of Nucor s plants. This opened up another avenue of attack on sheet markets, once the province of integrated mills. [Pg.381]

We could argue that protecting the environment must take priority over financial savings. After all, investments into clean technologies, such as a gas-fired plant, have global environmental implications, so why shouldn t a utility owner/operator take a little less profit ... [Pg.354]

The primary motivation of PSAs is to assess the risk of the plant to the public. The immediate purpose of the RSS was to support the Price-Anderson hearings on liability insurance (i.e., assess the financial exposure of a nuclear power reactor operator) a purpose which, even today, is beyond PSA technology. However, PSA is sufficiently precise to provide relative risk comparisons of reactor designs and sites. These uses of PSA were presented at the Indian Point hearings, and in defense of Shoreham. The PSAs for the high-population-zone plants (Limerick, Zion, and Indian Point) were prepared to show that specific features of these plants compensate for the higher population density relative to plants studied in the RSS. [Pg.383]


See other pages where Plant operation financial is mentioned: [Pg.1186]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.1295]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.935]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.1009]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.875]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.589]    [Pg.3]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.350 ]




SEARCH



Financial

Financials

Plant operation

Plant operators

© 2024 chempedia.info