Fillers specification parameters

The reinforcement parameter aF is a filler-specific constant that is independent of the cure system and is closely related to the morphology of the filler. 

This description of specification parameters is not meant to be at all exhaustive. Many other properties may be provided by individual filler producers on the composition and characterisation of their fillers. These are often directed specifically at one application where this type of filler is commonly used. These should be considered on their own merits and discussed with the supplier. 

The importance of the relevance of specification parameters to applicability should be borne in mind at all times. As we have seen, fillers play a vital role in the formulation of most rubber products. They are produced using a wide variety of processes and may have either natural or synthetic origins. Hence, fillers vary enormously in their chemical characteristics and in particle size, which, in turn, influences the filler s overall behaviour in rubber. Fillers provide the formulator with a range of materials that can modify processing behaviour, and physical and chemical properties of the polymer. Details of the production routes used and the characteristics of the individual filler types are shown in greater detail in Chapter 2. This chapter will concentrate on those aspects of particular importance to elastomers. 

It should be noted that for polymerization-modified perlite the strength parameters of the composition algo go up with the increasing initial particle size. [164]. In some studies it has been shown that the filler modification effect on the mechanical properties of composites is maximum when only a portion of the filler surface is given the polymerophilic properties (cf., e.g. [166-168]). The reason lies in the specifics of the boundary layer formation in the polymer-filler systems and formation of a secondary filler network . In principle, the patchy polymerophilic behavior of the filler in relation to the matrix should also have place in the failing polymerization-modified perlite. 

One of the most important phenomena in material science is the reinforcement of mbber by rigid entities, such as carbon black, clays, silicates, calcium carbonate, zinc oxide, MH, and metal oxide [45 7]. Thus, these fillers or reinforcement aids are added to mbber formulations to optimize properties that meet a given service application or sets of performance parameters [48-53]. Although the original purpose is to lower the cost of the molding compounds, prime importance is now attached to the selective active fillers and their quantity that produce specific improvements in mbber physical properties. 

Encapsulation of different entities inside the CNT channel stands alone as an alternative noncovalent functionalization approach. Many studies on the filling of carbon nanotubes with ions or molecules focus on how the presence of these fillers affects the physical properties of the tubes. From a different point of view, confinement of materials inside the cylindrical structure could be regarded as a way to protect such materials from the external environment, with the tubes acting as a nanoreactor or a nanotransporter. It is fascinating to envision specific reactions between molecules occurring inside the aromatic cylindrical framework, tailored by CNT characteristic parameters such as diameter, affinity towards specific molecules, etc. 

In general, the filler industry recognises these limitations, and tries to use a few relatively simple parameters that, taken in combination, give an approximate, working definition of morphology appropriate to the application in mind. The parameters that are most likely to be encountered are specific surface area, average particle size, effective top size and oil adsorption. The measurement and application of these are discussed in more detail below. 

Interfacial structure is known to be different from bulk structure, and in polymers filled with nanofillers possessing extremely high specific surface areas, most of the polymers is present near the interface, in spite of the small weight fraction of filler. This is one of the reasons why the nature of the reinforcement is different in nanocomposites and is manifested even at very low filler loadings (<10 wt%). Crucial parameters in determining the effect of fillers on the properties of composites are filler size, shape, aspect ratio, and filler-matrix interactions [2-5]. In the case of nanocomposites, the properties of the material are more tied to the interface. Thus, the control and manipulation of microstructural evolution is essential for the growth of a strong polymer-filler interface in such nanocomposites. 

The description of the physical properties of fluoroelastomers is necessarily less precise than that of fluoroplastics because of the major effect of adding curatives and fillers to achieve useful cross-linked materials of a given hardness and specific mechanical properties Generally, two parameters are varied increasing cross-link density increases modulus and decreases elongation, and raising filler levels increases hardness and decreases solvent swell because of the decreased volume fraction of the elastomer In addition to these two major vanables, the major determinants of vulcanizate behavior are the chemical and thermal stabilities of its cross-links The selection of elastomer, of course, places limits on the overall resistance to fluids and chemicals and on its service temperature range... 

It is important to recognize that these correlations only apply to a specific polymer and, as discussed above, will be sensitive to changes in the polymer crystallinity, the inclusion of filler, and the exact chemical composition. The sensitivity of solubility in polydimethylsiloxane to the filler content has been noted (14 15) and the correlation in Table III for PDMS applies ony to the unfilled fluid. The crystallinity of many polymers depends on their molecular weight, and may change if the polymer is subject to biodegradation. The solubility parameter, i.e. the polarity, of polyurethanes, is sensitive to the nature and ratio of the ether (or ester) and urethane segments. 

In a search for the defining structural parameter of a composite, the free volume of disperse system proved to be the most sound one from the physical standpoint Presumably, for disperse systems the free volume is a measure of the mobility of filler particles, just as for liquids it is a measure of the mobility of molecules. But as applied to highly-loaded coarse systems of the type solid particles — liquid — gas this notion requires a certain correction. In characterizing the structure of such specific systems as highly-loaded coarse composites, it should be noted that to prevent their settling and separation into layers under the action of vibration, the concentration of the finest filler fraction with the largest specific surface in dispersion medium should be the maximum possible. Because of this and also because of the small size of particles (20-40 pm), the fine fraction suspended in the dispersion medium practically does not participate in the formation of the composite skeleton, which consists of coarser particles. Therefore... 

The content of amorphous phase and the small size of spherulites lead to an improvement of the fracture toughness of Polypropylene [16]. In presence of mineral filler, the particle surface chemistry can induce some specific microstructural characteristics of the PP matrix parameters such as degree of crystallisation, spherulite size, and p phase content (a/p ratio) [16]. 

Selecting dispersion equipment for a specific application is a complex task. Dispersion of the mixture must be complete and the process and equipment must meet economic constraints. But much more is involved. In practice, such simple criteria are complicated by a variety of parameters related to fillers and to the materials in which they are dispersed. These parameters complicate the problem to the degree that it is not easy to formulate general guidelines. In this discussion we will consider the available equipment types most frequently used for filler dispersion and illustrate their applicability with some examples. 

Specific surface area, related to the particle size is a very important parameter. As with particle size, it is useful in helping us to understand how the properties of filled materials are so strongly influenced by fillers. 

This book shows that one filler introduced to the formulation affects many different parameters characterizing the product. In typical formulations of finished products 5-30 raw materials are used, each playing some role and potentially interacting with the remaining components. If the entire direction of formulation is predicted based on a crude measurement of the most common product indicators in specification, the entire principle of mathematics is neglected because a sufficient amount of information does not exist to solve equations in a realistic way. 

By improving the different parameters that play a role in monolithicity, preparation refinements can be found. A base-catalyzed alkoxide solution leads to fine particles of silica with a specific surface area of 250-350 m2/g. This powder is mixed with fluorinated silicon ethoxide solution. Both filler and fluorine allow one to obtain monolithic silica gels [60]. 

---