Failure modes tensile

Figure 4.41 shows the Stress-Strength Interference (SSI) diagrams for the two assembly operation failure modes. The instantaneous stress on the relief section on first assembly is composed of two parts first the applied tensile stress,. v, due to the pre-load, F, and secondly, the torsional stress, t, due to the torque on assembly, M, and this is shown in Figure 4.41(a) (Edwards and McKee, 1991). This stress is at a maximum during the assembly operation. If the component survives this stress, it will not fail by stress rupture later in life. 

Different factors contribute to the mechanical properties of plant tissue cell turgor, which is one of the most important ones, cell bonding force through middle lamella, cell wall resistance to compression or tensile forces, density of cell packaging, which defines the free spaces with gas or liquid, and some factors, also common to other products, such as sample size and shape, temperature, and strain rate (Vincent, 1994). Depending on the sample properties (mainly turgor and resistance of middle lamella), two failure modes have been described (Pitt, 1992) cell debonding and cell rupture. 

Blast loaded structures produce high reaction loads at column supports. This usually requires substantial base plates as well as high capacity anchor bolts. Achieving full anchorage of these bolts is of primary importance and will usually require headed bolts or plates at the embedded end of the bolts to prevent pullout. When anchor bolts are securely anchored into concrete, the failure mechanism is a ductile, tensile failure of the bolt steel. Insufficient edge distance or insufficient spacing between bolts results in a lower anchorage capacity and a brittle failure mode. 

For unreinforced masonry, the failure mode is based on tensile cracking. To avoid the resulting catastrophic failure, the wall must remain elastic. Thus, pa = 1.0... 

Bader, M.G., Charalambides, B, Ling, J. (1991). The influence of fiber-matrix interface strength on the tensile strength and failure mode in uniaxial CFRP. In Proc. ICCM-VIII, Composites Design. Manufacture and Application (S.W. Tsai and G.S. Springer, eds.), SAMPE Pub. Paper 1II. 

Some of the best uses of Kevlar are in aircraft composites and flak jackets for military and police uses, which require high tensile strength and high modulus per unit of weight. It also has the property of damage tolerance, as it has a ductile compressive failure mode, which is very different from the brittle failure of carbon fibers. 

One of the simplest criteria specific to the internal port cracking failure mode is based on the uniaxial strain capability in simple tension. Since the material properties are known to be strain rate- and temperature-dependent, tests are conducted under various conditions, and a failure strain boundary is generated. Strain at rupture is plotted against a variable such as reduced time, and any strain requirement which falls outside of the boundary will lead to rupture, and any condition inside will be considered safe. Ad hoc criteria have been proposed, such as that of Landel (55) in which the failure strain eL is defined as the ratio of the maximum true stress to the initial modulus, where the true stress is defined as the product of the extension ratio and the engineering stress —i.e., breaks down at low strain rates and higher temperatures. Milloway and Wiegand (68) suggested that motor strain should be less than half of the uniaxial tensile strain at failure at 0.74 min.-1. This criterion was based on 41 small motor tests. 

Here we have conducted experiments to develop an understanding of how the commercial size interacts with the matrix in the glass fiber-matrix interphase. Careful characterization of the mechanical response of the fiber-matrix interphase (interfacial shear strength and failure mode) with measurements of the relevant materials properties (tensile modulus, tensile strength, Poisson s ratio, and toughness) of size/matrix compositions typical of expected interphases has been used to develop a materials perspective of the fiber-sizing-matrix interphase which can be used to explain composite mechanical behavior and which can aid in the formulation of new sizing systems. 

The strength of adhesion between the fiber and matrix could also be expected to play a role in this change in failure mode. The interfacial testing system (ITS) provides comparative data on the interfacial shear strengths of the bare and sized E-glass fibers in real composites. A handbook value of 76 GPa [19] was used for the tensile modulus of E-glass fibers and the matrix shear modulus was previously determined as 1.10 GPa. Table 4 lists the mean interfacial shear strength, standard deviation (SD), and number of fiber ends tested for the two fiber types. 

The increase in ILSS for the epoxy-sized fibers over the bare fibers is 12.4%, approximately 50% of the increase observed in the interfacial shear strength as measured by ITS testing. Changes in the failure mode at the fiber-matrix interface may account for the differences. The sized fibers produced large matrix cracks that grew quickly to catastrophic size under load. This would tend to limit the increase in composite shear properties if at every fiber break in the tensile surface of the coupon a matrix crack was created. The presence of these matrix cracks... 

The same molecular mechanisms as in tensile drawing are observed, of course, in constant load experiments. Depending on the stress-time-temperature regime essentially four different failure modes are observed with thermoplastic materials ... 

As can be seen, some larger fragments are seen in the sample held at elevated temperature, and sodium has segregated to the surface. Such segregation is very common in high temperature cured specimens, where sodium is often found at the failure surface in an adhesive failure mode. ISS/SIMS data from the adhesive side of a titanium-epoxy failure interface from a tensile test specimen are shown, in Figure 8. 

Adherends Adhesive Tensile shear strength, MPa Failure mode... 

A standard test report usually documents the resulting measurements, such as tensile shear strength and peel strength. It should also indicate all the pertinent conditions that are required to ensure reproducibility in subsequent testing. It is often very useful to describe the failure mode of the tested specimens. An analysis of the type (or mode) of failure is an extremely valuable tool to determine the cause of adhesive failure. The failed joint should be visually examined to determine where and to what extent failure occurred. The percent of the failure that is in the adhesion mode and that in the cohesion mode should be provided. A description of the failure mode itself (location, percent coverage, uniformity, etc.) is often quite useful. The purpose of this exercise is to establish the weak link in the joint to better understand the mechanism of failure. 

During cool-down, the center region experiences tensile stresses, but these are less detrimental according to failure modes observed in the field. 

Figure 4 shows typical failure surfaces obtained from tensile tests of the co-cured single and double lap Joint specimens. In the case of the co-cured single lap Joint, as the surface preparation on the steel adherend is better, a greater amount of carbon fibers and epoxy resin is attached to the steel adherend. Failure mechanism is a partial cohesive failure mode at the C ply of the composite adherend. In contrast with the co-cured single lap joint, failure mechanism of the co-cured double lap joint is the partial cohesive failure or interlaminar delamination failure at the 1 ply of the composite adherend because interfocial out-of-plane peel stress... 

Fracture process in multidirectional composite laminates subjected to in-plane static or fatigue tensile loading involves sequential accumulation of damage in the form of matrix cracks that appear parallel to the fibres in the off-axis plies, edge delamination and local delamination long before catastrophic failure. These resin dominated failure modes significantly reduce the laminate stiffness and are detrimental to its strength. 

Load to failure, lbs. (N) Tensile bond strength, psi (MPa) Failure mode... 

As the failure mode is concerned, only the weakest Series I was broken by the shear failure of core plates but others were broken by the tensile failure of glass fibers. Therefore a certain higher flexural strength of sandwich plates is expected if the reinforcing fiber is stronger. 

---