Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steel adherends

Surface cleaning/etches. As with aluminum and titanium, the most critical test for bonded steel joints is durability in hostile (i.e., humid) environments. The fact that the problem is a serious one for steel was illustrated in a study [117] that compared solvent cleaned (smooth) 1010 cold-rolled steel surfaces with FPL aluminum (microrough) substrates. Although the dry lap-shear strengths were not markedly different, stressed lap-shear joints of steel adherends that were exposed to a humid environment failed in less than 30 days, whereas the aluminum joints lasted for more than 3000 days. [Pg.985]

Under the best of conditions, single lap joint samples do not fail in pure shear due to the tensile and peel forces present at the ends of the overlap. These non-shear forces are exacerbated when using thin gauge adherends. Because of this, the lap joint dimensions as well as the testing rate were modified from the ASTM D-1002 standard as a result of earlier work on thin gauge steel adherends. [Pg.182]

The extent of coating adhesion failure was found to be dependent upon the resistance of the polymer in the coating to hydrolysis by corrosion generated hydroxide. In this study, similar trends have been observed for adhesives. Table I shows the results of salt spray corrosion on a series of bonds between cold rolled steel adherends and adhesives of varying chemistry. The results show that there is a direct correlation between the chemistry of the adhesive polymer and the durability of the series of adhesive bonds studied. The locus of adhesion failure also appears to be related to the type of adhesive chemistry. In this study, adhesives based on polymers having a wide range of hydrolysis resistance were examined. [Pg.196]

The Effect of Adhesive Primers. In practice, adhesive bonds involving metal adherends often use primers as pretreatments of the metal surface prior to bonding. Table IV shows the durability of composite-metal bonds prepared with adhesive C over a series of primers (of varying corrosion resistance) in 240 hour salt spray test. The results indicate that the performance of bonds is directly related to the corrosion resistance of the primer used to prepare the adherend surface. In general, the adhesion of the primer to the steel adherend, rather than the adhesive chemistry. [Pg.200]

Abstract—The effects of metal alkoxide type and relative humidity on the durability of alkoxide-primed, adhesively bonded steel wedge crack specimens have been determined. Aluminum tri-sec-butoxide, aluminum tri-tert-butoxide, tetrabutyl orthosilicate, and titanium(IV) butoxide were used as alkoxide primers. Grit-blasted, acetone-rinsed mild steel adherends were the substrates bonded with epoxy and polyethersulfone. The two aluminum alkoxides significantly enhanced the durability of the adhesively bonded steel, while the titanium alkoxide showed no improvement in durability over a nonprimed control. The silicon alkoxide-primed samples gave an intermediate response. The failure plane in the adhesively bonded samples varied with the relative humidity during the priming process. [Pg.569]

There is an apparent optimum relative humidity level required to achieve good adhesion and durability. Priming the steel adherends at 18% RH caused failure in the wedge samples within the steel (oxide) layer. Adherends primed at 34% RH failed within the alkoxide primer layer, whereas at 51% RH failure occurred primarily within the adhesive layer. This change in locus of failure with humidity was not evident using the wedge crack test when the adherends were primed with aluminum alkoxides. A peel-type test would probably be more sensitive in detecting these shifts in failure mode. [Pg.578]

Fig. 4. Photograph of the typical foiled surfaces on the steel adherend of the cocured lap Joints, (a) Co-cured single lap joint and (b) co-cured double lap Joint. Fig. 4. Photograph of the typical foiled surfaces on the steel adherend of the cocured lap Joints, (a) Co-cured single lap joint and (b) co-cured double lap Joint.
Figure 4 shows typical failure surfaces obtained from tensile tests of the co-cured single and double lap Joint specimens. In the case of the co-cured single lap Joint, as the surface preparation on the steel adherend is better, a greater amount of carbon fibers and epoxy resin is attached to the steel adherend. Failure mechanism is a partial cohesive failure mode at the C ply of the composite adherend. In contrast with the co-cured single lap joint, failure mechanism of the co-cured double lap joint is the partial cohesive failure or interlaminar delamination failure at the 1 ply of the composite adherend because interfocial out-of-plane peel stress... [Pg.376]

ISO 11343, 1993, Adhesives—Determination of dynamic resistance to cleavage of high strength adhesive bonds under impact conditions- Wedge impact method The method is mainly aimed for the characterisation of metal substrates suitable for automotive applications. An instrumented impact testing machine (pendulum type) of 50-300 J and. 3-5.5ms maximum capacity is required for this test. A blunt wedge of approximately 1 mm tip radius and included angle of 8 is impact driven into a bonded joint at 3 ms" for aluminum alloy adherends and 2 ms" for steel adherends. The impact event should be... [Pg.575]

A reason that one should be very cautious in attempting to use average shear stress criteria to predict failure of lap joints is illustrated in Fig. 7. This figure shows the force required to cause failure in ASTM D-1002 lap joint specimens using steel adherends of differing thicknesses. Note that for a given applied load, the average shear stress for all adherend thickness would be the same (i.e., the applied force divided by the area of... [Pg.233]

Steel adherends are also subject to corrosion in moist environments. Unfortunately, no general etch or anodization treatment has been developed that provides superior bond durability [12,18,46]. In part, this is due to the lack of a coherent, adherent stable oxide— iron oxides do not protect the underlying substrate from the environment. Equally important, the different steel metallurgies react to chemical treatments differently—a procedure that may give good results for one steel alloy may give very poor results for another, similar steel alloy. [Pg.282]

Gritblasted steel adherends ( indicates silane-primed)... [Pg.143]

Fig. 4.22. Condition of the bonded interface of unstressed double lap joints after 2 years natural exposure. (Joints constructed with gritblasted steel adherends united by 5 types of epoxide adhesive, and cured at 20 C). Fig. 4.22. Condition of the bonded interface of unstressed double lap joints after 2 years natural exposure. (Joints constructed with gritblasted steel adherends united by 5 types of epoxide adhesive, and cured at 20 C).
Suitable primers of the corrosion inhibiting type should be specified for use with this adhesive, gritblasted steel adherends and hardened concrete. [Pg.298]

The surface preparation of steel adherends for joint testing should be as follows. [Pg.302]

Lap shear strength. Tests should be carried out over a range of temperatures, specifically including -25 °C, +20 °C and +45 °C. using bright mild steel adherends. The temperature should be measured by means of a thermocouple attached to the steel surface of the joint. Two alternative forms of lap shear joint may be employed. [Pg.304]


See other pages where Steel adherends is mentioned: [Pg.31]    [Pg.963]    [Pg.989]    [Pg.991]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.963]    [Pg.989]    [Pg.991]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.304]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.6 ]




SEARCH



Adherend

Adherends

Steel adherend

© 2024 chempedia.info