Extract concentration analysis

As reported in the previous section, AEDA is performed with a concentrated aroma extract. However, concentration of the volatile fraction might lead to losses of odorants, e.g. by evaporation and by enhanced side reactions in the concentrated extract. Consequently, the odour potency of these odorants can be underestimated in comparison to those whose levels are not reduced during concentration. To clarify this point, aroma extract concentration analysis (AECA) [56] should check the results of AEDA. AECA starts with GC-O of the original extract from which the non-volatile components have been removed. The extract is then concentrated stepwise by distilling olf the solvent, and after each step an aliquot is analysed by GC-O [56]. 

Table 16.4 Potent odorants of boiled beef—comparison (AECA) with AEDA [56] of aroma extract concentration analysis...

Grosch, W., Kerscher, R., Kubickova, J., JageUa, T. (2001) Aroma extract dilution analysis versus aroma extract concentration analysis. In Leland, J.V., Schieberle, R, Buettner, A., Acree, T. (eds.) Gas Chromatography Olfactometry The State of the Art. ACS Symposium Series 782, pp. 138-147... 

The procedure of simultaneous extracting-spectrophotometric determination of nitrophenols in wastewater is proposed on the example of the analysis of mixtures of mono-, di-, and trinitrophenols. The procedure consists of extraction concentrating in an acid medium, and sequential back-extractions under various pH. Such procedures give possibility for isolation o-, m-, p-nitrophenols, a-, P-, y-dinitrophenols and trinitrophenol in separate groups. Simultaneous determination is carried out by summary light-absorption of nitrophenol-ions. The error of determination concentrations on maximum contaminant level in natural waters doesn t exceed 10%. The peculiarities of application of the sequential extractions under fixed pH were studied on the example of mixture of simplest phenols (phenol, o-, m-, />-cresols). The procedure of their determination is based on the extraction to carbon tetrachloride, subsequent back-extraction and spectrophotometric measurement of interaction products with diazo-p-nitroaniline. 

In the last several years, on-line extraction systems have become a popular way to deal with the analysis of large numbers of water samples. Vacuum manifolds and computerized SPE stations were all considered to be off-line systems, i.e., the tubes had to be placed in the system rack and the sample eluate collected in a test-tube or other appropriate vessel. Then, the eluted sample had to be collected and the extract concentrated and eventually transferred to an autosampler vial for instrumental analyses. Robotics systems were designed to aid in these steps of sample preparation, but some manual sample manipulation was still required. Operation and programming of the robotic system could be cumbersome and time consuming when changing methods. 

SFE-GC is an attractive approach to coupling the extraction, concentration and chromatographic steps for the analysis of samples containing analytes that can be analysed using capillary GC. Often it is difficult to identify all the components which are extracted from samples by FID alone. This is a particular problem when the sample history and/or the identity of the compounds of interest are not known. When SFE-GC is combined to powerful spectroscopic detectors, unique data can be obtained, allowing their use as routine tools in the analytical laboratory. For positive identification of components of interest, multihyphenated techniques such as SFE-GC-AED, SFE-GC-MS, SFE-GC-FUR-MS are employed [46]. 

Applications Identification of polymer additives by TLC-IR is labour intensive and comprises extraction, concentration of extracts, component separation by TLC on silica, drying, removal of spots, preparation of KBr pellets and IR analysis. The method was illustrated with natural rubber formulations, where N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazyl sulfenamide, IPPD and 6PPD antioxidants, and a naphthenic plasticiser were readily quantified [765]. An overview of polymer/additive type compounds analysed by transfer TLC-FTIR is given in Table 7.80. 

A method for tributyltin in sediments consists of extraction with anhydrous acetic acid, hydride generation, cold trapping and end analysis by GC-AAS using a quartz furnace75. Reduction with NaBFLi followed by solvent extraction, concentration and GC-FPD was proposed for simulaneous determination of di- and tributyltin residues in sea water LOD 10 ng/L for 1 L sample, with 87.1-98.4% of Sn recovery76. 

In order to understand the removal of FMs during wastewater treatment, it is necessary to measure these compounds throughout the wastewater treatment process. Because of the complex nature of wastewater matrices and the low concentration of FMs (0.001-60 pg/L) [11] throughout the treatment plant, accurate and sensitive analytical methods have been developed by a number of researchers. Fortunately, the analytical techniques developed to measure traditional SOCs, such as solvent extraction, extract concentration, and analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, in general also apply to FMs. 

Sample preparation for analysis by hyphenated methods requires some additional planning when compared to nonhyphenated methods. All steps, extraction, concentration, and final solvent selection must take into consideration and be compatible with all the components of the hyphenated instrumentation. For gas chromatographic methods, all the components in the mixture must be in the gaseous state. For liquid chromatography (LC) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the samples of the analytes of interest can be solids or liquids, neutral or charged molecules, or ions, but they must be in solution. If the follow-on analysis is by MS, then each of the analytes may require a different method of introduction into the MS. Metals and metal ions may be introduced by HPLC if they are in solution but commonly are introduced via AAS or inductively coupled plasma (ICP). Other analytes may be directly introduced from HPLC to MS [2],... 

Fig. 22 a-c. Typical examples of organotin contaminated samples a GC-FPD chromatograms of butyltin in human blood extracts (concentrations are <17 ng/ml, 16 ng/ml, and 85 ng/ml of MBT, DBT, and TBT, respectively, after [285] with permission b GC-AED analysis of a diethylether extract of a snow sample collected in the tin channel (Sn = 271 nm) - Gdansk, Poland, after [286] with permission c GC-AED analysis of a diethylether extract of a snow sample collected in the chlorine channel (Cl = 479 nm) - Gdansk, Poland, after [286] with permission... 

Several strategies have been described for the preconcentration of sample components present at low concentrations. These techniques include zone sharpening,28-29 on-line packed columns,30 and transient capillary isotachophoresis (cITP).31-32 Other standard laboratory techniques are often used, including solid-phase extraction, protein precipitation, ultrafiltration, etc. Two important points to keep in mind when selecting a concentration protocol are the sample requirements of the method and the potential selectivity on relative concentrations of sample components. The latter point applies to purity and concentration analysis. 

The method detection limit is, in reality, a statistical concept that is applicable only in trace analysis of certain types of substances, such as organic pollutants by gas chromatographic methods. The method detection limit measures the minimum detection limit of the method and involves all analytical steps, including sample extraction, concentration, and determination by an analytical instrument. Unlike the instrument detection limit, the method detection limit is not confined only to the detection limit of the instrument. 

The principle behind the test method(s) is that antibodies are made of proteins that recognize and bind with foreign substances (antigens) that invade host animals. Synthetic antibodies have been developed to complex with petroleum constituents. The antibodies are immobilized on the walls of a special ceU or filter membrane. Water samples are added directly to the cell, while soils must be extracted before analysis. A known amount of labeled analyte (typically, an enzyme with an affinity for the antibody) is added after the sample. The sample analytes compete with the enzyme-labeled analytes for sites on the antibodies. After equilibrium is established, the cell is washed to remove any um-eacted sample or labeled enzyme. Color development reagents that react with the labeled enzyme are added. A solution that stops color development is added at a specified time, and the optical density (color intensity) is measured. Because the coloring agent reacts with the labeled enzyme, samples with high optical density contain low concentrations of analytes. Concentration is inversely proportional to optical density. 

For a high level of confidence you will need to have both fleld and "method blanks. Field blanks are blanks from a similar source that do not contain the analytes of Interest. Control sites (uncontaminated sites) are used to obtain field blanks and If field blanks are not available, every effort should be made to obtain blank samples that best simulate a sample that does not contain the analyte (such as a simulated or synthetic field blank). Your method blanks will consist of all solvents, resins, etc. that you will use for extracting, concentrating and cleaning up the samples prior to analysis. You may want about half of these unspIked and the remainder spiked with known levels of your analyte standards. Similarly you may want to spike about half of your field blanks with known levels of your analyte standards so that any matrix effects will be Identified during the analysis. This plan would provide you with ... 

Hall et al. (1985) reported that no 1,2-diphenylhydrazine (less than pg/L) was detected in the Nanticoke River near the Chesapeake Bay. The analytical method involved liquid-liquid extraction, concentration, and. analysis by GC/MS. The Contract Laboratory Program statistical database (queried April 13, 1987) reported that 1 2-diphenylhydrazine has been detected n water at i of 357 hazardous waste sites at a concentration of (96 ppb (CLPSDB 1987), and has been reported at 7 of 117, sites. n the national Priority List database (ATSDR 1990) The U.S. EPA Contract laboratory Program uses GC methods to analyze the contaminants of interest. Since 1,2-diphenylhydrazine oxidize, to azobenzene in the GC injector port and both 1,2-diphenylhydrazine and azobenzene, have the same GC retention time and mass spectra, reports of 1,2-diphenylhydrazine from the Contract Laboratory Program may actually represent detections of 1,2-diphenylhydrazine, azobenzene, or both (see Chapter 6 for more details). 

This method of extracting concentration-dependent D is usually referred to as Boltzmann analysis. 

Analysis of antioxidant properties relative to the DPPH" radical involves observation of colour disappearance in the radical solution in the presence of the solution under analysis which contains antioxidants. A solution of extract under analysis is introduced to the environment containing the DPPH radical at a specific concentration. A methanol solution of the DPPH radical is purple, while a reaction with antioxidants turns its colour into yellow. Colorimetric comparison of the absorbance of the radical solution and a solution containing an analysed sample enables one to make calculations and to express activity as the percent of inhibition (IP) or the number of moles of a radical that can be neutralised by a specific amount of the analysed substance (mmol/g). In another approach, a range of assays are conducted with different concentrations of the analysed substance to determine its amount which inactivates half of the radical in the test solution (ECso). The duration of such a test depends on the reaction rate and observations are carried out until the absorbance of the test solution does not change [4]. If the solution contains substances whose absorbance disturbs the measurement, the concentration of DPPH radical is measured directly with the use of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. 

---