Evaluation of performance limiting factors

Users need not complete data input in the Data Entry module. Any information omitted by the user will be requested interactively when required by POTW EXPERT during the Major Unit Process Evaluation or Evaluation of Performance Limiting Factors. POTW EXPERT will attempt to reason in the absence of user input data, but will not conclude its reasoning process if critical input is missing. 

The primary output of this module is a categorization of the POTW according to its capability to produce effluent of required quality. The module also reports a comparison of process capacity against plant influent loads, and indicates which process(es) may be limiting the plant s ability to meet effluent quality goals. Many of the calculated results generated by this module also serve as input to the Evaluation of Performance Limiting Factors. 

Evaluation of Performance Limiting Factors. The 66 PLFs identified by Process Applications fall into four categories design operation maintenance and administration. A few examples of Performance Limiting Factors are ... 

In the Evaluation of Performance Limiting Factors module, knowledge about the PLFs is maintained by a structure of demons and variables coded in ALEX. 

CONTEXTS - - The larger problem of evaluating POTW Performance Limiting Factors is divided into contexts. Contexts define the skeleton of an expert system implemented in ALEX they correspond to relatively isolated sections of the problem under investigation, in our case, to the major evaluation areas of the POTW performance analysis. A hierarchy of contexts can be defined, so that this top level architecture can be subdivided into a number of sublevels. In POTW EXPERT, the top level contexts are system managers, which... 

The Performance Limiting Factors (PLFs) are structured as a series of questions which require the evaluator to judge the extent to which each PLF may be related to an identified performance problem. An initial analysis eliminates most PLFs from consideration as causes of poor plant performance, and leaves a subset (usually no more than 10 to 15 PLFs) which contribute directly to the identified performance... 

Some studies were specifically oriented towards evaluating the importance of the limiting factor. Thus, Kim et al. (1994) showed that C. necator performs better with a delayed nitrogen limitation. More recently, Mozumber et al. (2013) established that the nitrogen limitation can, of course, be considered as a sufficient condition for the production of PHA by C. necator, but in no case can this be considered a necessary condition to trigger such a production. ... 

The main purpose for the heating and air conditioning of work spaces is to provide an environment that is acceptable and does not impair the health and performance of the occupants. During production processes and in the external environment it may be necessary to work in unacceptable conditions for a limited time period. However, it must be ensured that these conditions do not impair the health of the employees. Light, noise, air quality, and the thermal environment are all factors that influence the acceptability of conditions for and performance of the occupants. This section will only deal with the thermal environment. Several standards dealing with methods for the evaluation of the thermal environment have been published by international standard organizations such as ISO and CEN. 

Numerical models are used to predict the performance and assist in the design of final cover systems. The availability of models used to conduct water balance analyses of ET cover systems is currently limited, and the results can be inconsistent. For example, models such as Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) and Unsaturated Soil Water and Heat Flow (UNSAT-H) do not address all of the factors related to ET cover system performance. These models, for instance, do not consider percolation through preferential pathways may underestimate or overestimate percolation and have different levels of detail regarding weather, soil, and vegetation. In addition, HELP does not account for physical processes, such as matric potential, that generally govern unsaturated flow in ET covers.39 42 47... 

The following considerations, when applied during method development, are likely to produce more robust, reliable, and transferable methods (a) the concerns of the customer (user) are considered in advance, (b) key process input variables are identified, (c) criticaTto-quality factors are determined, (d) several method verification tests are installed, (e) proactive evaluation of method performance during development is performed, (f) continuous customer involvement and focus are institutionalized, and (g) method capability assessment (suitability to be applied for release testing against specification limits) is established. 

Consent decrees may specify hardware or additive solutions for individual applications. When a refiner agrees to implement a hardware solution, emissions limits are typically specified in the Consent Decree. This requires the refiner to design and implement an appropriately sized unit to meet these limits. With FCC additive solutions or hybrid solutions combining hardware and additives (such as a hydrotreater and SOj reduction additive), final emissions limits are not generally defined in the Consent Decree. Instead, a testing and demonstration program is defined to determine the performance of the additive(s) in the FCC unit at optimized concentrations. This may also be the case for some hardware solutions. The process to determine the optimized additive rate and process conditions is also identified. A baseline period and model is often used to determine additive effectiveness. A series of kick-out factors based upon additive performance are evaluated to determine the optimized level... 

Current Propellant Capabilities and Limitations. In selecting a propellant system for any application, the various considerations and factors briefly outlined above are weighted for each of the propellant candidates against the requirements of the proposed system. Initially, the potential candidates are screened by evaluating their performance potential (Is and/or Isd, as required). Some insight into the performance of different combinations can be obtained by utilizing a generalized performance criteria chart such as shown in Table I. 

Method validation includes determination of performance characteristics such as selectivity (which determines accuracy), linearity, precision, and sensitivity (limit of detection). This work evaluated linearity, precision, and sensitivity for specific CZE separation conditions selectivity was reported previously (15). Factors that contribute to assay imprecision by affecting peak shape (such as the pH of the mobile phase) or migration velocity (pH effects on the electrophoretic velocity) were evaluated also. 

In the evaluation of the toxic characteristics of a gas, volatile chemical, aerosol, or particulate matter, determination of subchronic inhalation toxicity may be performed after initial toxicity information has been obtained via acute testing. It provides information on health hazards likely to arise from repeated exposure by the inhalation route over a limited period of time. Hazards of inhaled chemicals are influenced by the inherent toxicity and by physical factors such as volatility and particle size. The housing and feeding conditions, before and after exposure to environmental chemicals, should be planned according to the standard animal husbandry conditions described for acute oral toxicity study. 

For residues (such as cleaning agents) that do not have a defined dose, some measure of toxicity, such as an acceptable daily intake (ADI), is used for residue limit purposes. If the subsequently manufactured product is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD), and has no defined dose, then some evaluation of the effects of target residues on the performance or stability of the IVD product should be performed. These non-dose factors are used only for the Li limit there are no changes for calculation of L2 and L3 limits. 

---