Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Linearity, evaluation

Table 67-1 presents the results of computing the linearity evaluation results for the curves shown in Figure 67-1, for the case of a uniform distribution of data along the... [Pg.453]

A detailed treatment of linearity evaluation is beyond the scope of this present book but a few general points are made below. It is important to establish the homogeneity of the variance ( homoscedasticity ) of the method across the working range. This can be done by carrying out ten replicate measurements at the extreme ends of the range. The variance of each set is calculated and a statistical test (F test) carried out to check if these two variances are statistically significantly different [9]. [Pg.89]

Note that instruments 1-4 were photometric devices with less then 0.01 absorbance accuracy evaluated against reference neutral filters at 546 nm and A = 1.000, traceable to INM. The bandwidth provided by the interference filters equipping the absorption photometers was within the range of 4-10 nm. Instrument 5 was a 10 nm bandwidth photometric device with less than 1.0% absorbance linearity, evaluated at 405 nm and 500 nm, against liquid absorbance RMs type 16.02 and 16.03 [5], Enzymatic colorimetric methods for determination of glucose and urea were used. The o-cresoftalein colorimetric method was used for calcium determination. [Pg.187]

Peh, Z., Miko, S., and Mileusnic, M. (2006). Areal versus linear evaluation of relationship between drainage basin lithology and geochemistry of stream and overbank sediments in low-order mountainous drainage basins. Environ. Geol. 49, 1102-1115. [Pg.92]

Dilutional linearity Evaluate Establish Monitor and establish dilutions not covered in prestudy validation... [Pg.86]

Macka, M., Andersson, R, and Haddad, R R., Linearity evaluation in absorbance detection The use of light-emitting diodes for on-capiUary detection in capfllary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 17, 1898, 1996. [Pg.327]

A comparison of the linear and non-linear results is provided in Table 2, where the increase in the resistance connected with non-linear evaluation for different quantile is shown. The advantage of non-linear methodology is particularly evident at low probability, with resistance increase above 25% (i.e., non-linear estimation of containment capacity for the given quantile is more than % higher than the linear estimation). [Pg.2285]

Calculate the weighted network area Anetwork from Eq. (7.22). When the weighted h values i4>h) vary appreciably, say, by more than one order of magnitude, an improved estimate of Anetwork can be evaluated by linear programming. ... [Pg.230]

In some depositional environments, e.g. fluviatile channels, marked differences in reservoir thickness will be encountered. Hence the assumption of a constant thickness, or a linear trend in thickness across the field will no longer apply. In those cases a set of additional maps will be required. Usually a net oil sand (NOS) map will be prepared by the production geologist and then used to evaluate the hydrocarbon volume in place. [Pg.156]

Linear response theory is an example of a microscopic approach to the foundations of non-equilibrium thennodynamics. It requires knowledge of tire Hamiltonian for the underlying microscopic description. In principle, it produces explicit fomuilae for the relaxation parameters that make up the Onsager coefficients. In reality, these expressions are extremely difficult to evaluate and approximation methods are necessary. Nevertheless, they provide a deeper insight into the physics. [Pg.708]

In principle, one can do beder by allowing for R-dependence to U and T. If we allow them to vary linearly with R, then we have Gordon s method [42]. However, the higher order evaluation in this case leads to a much more cumbersome theory that is often less efficient even though larger steps can be used. [Pg.985]

Now let us return to the Kolm variational theory that was introduced in section A3.11.2.8. Here we demonstrate how equation (A3.11.46) may be evaluated using basis set expansions and linear algebra. This discussion will be restricted to scattering in one dimension, but generalization to multidimensional problems is very similar. [Pg.988]

This converts the calculation of S to the evaluation of matrix elements together with linear algebra operations. Generalizations of this theory to multichaimel calculations exist and lead to a result of more or less tire same form. [Pg.989]

The polarization P is given in tenns of E by the constitutive relation of the material. For the present discussion, we assume that the polarization P r) depends only on the field E evaluated at the same position r. This is the so-called dipole approximation. In later discussions, however, we will consider, in some specific cases, the contribution of a polarization that has a non-local spatial dependence on the optical field. Once we have augmented the system of equation B 1.5.16. equation B 1.5.17. equation B 1.5.18. equation B 1.5.19 and equation B 1.5.20 with the constitutive relation for the dependence of Pon E, we may solve for the radiation fields. This relation is generally characterized tlirough the use of linear and nonlinear susceptibility tensors, the subject to which we now turn. [Pg.1271]

To simplify FECO evaluation, it is conmion practice to experimentally filter out one of the components by the use of a linear polarizer after the interferometer. Mica bireftingence can, however, be useftil to study thin films of birefringent molecules [49] between the surfaces. Rabinowitz [53] has presented an eigenvalue analysis of birefringence in the multiple beam interferometer. [Pg.1735]

Using the fluctuation-dissipation theorem [361, which relates microscopic fluctuations at equilibrium to macroscopic behaviour in the limit of linear responses, the time-dependent shear modulus can be evaluated [371 ... [Pg.2528]

The second application of the CFTI protocol is the evaluation of the free energy differences between four states of the linear form of the opioid peptide DPDPE in solution. Our primary result is the determination of the free energy differences between the representative stable structures j3c and Pe and the cyclic-like conformer Cyc of linear DPDPE in aqueous solution. These free energy differences, 4.0 kcal/mol between pc and Cyc, and 6.3 kcal/mol between pE and Cyc, reflect the cost of pre-organizing the linear peptide into a conformation conducive for disulfide bond formation. Such a conformational change is a pre-requisite for the chemical reaction of S-S bond formation to proceed. The predicted low population of the cyclic-like structure, which is presumably the biologically active conformer, agrees qualitatively with observed lower potency and different receptor specificity of the linear form relative to the cyclic peptide. [Pg.173]

In LN, the bonded interactions are treated by the approximate linearization, and the local nonbonded interactions, as well as the nonlocal interactions, are treated by constant extrapolation over longer intervals Atm and At, respectively). We define the integers fci,fc2 > 1 by their relation to the different timesteps as Atm — At and At = 2 Atm- This extrapolation as used in LN contrasts the modern impulse MTS methods which only add the contribution of the slow forces at the time of their evaluation. The impulse treatment makes the methods symplectic, but limits the outermost timestep due to resonance (see figures comparing LN to impulse-MTS behavior as the outer timestep is increased in [88]). In fact, the early versions of MTS methods for MD relied on extrapolation and were abandoned because of a notable energy drift. This drift is avoided by the phenomenological, stochastic terms in LN. [Pg.252]

Very recently, we have developed and incorporated into the CHARMM molecular mechanics program a version of LN that uses direct-force evaluation, rather than linearization, for the fast-force components [91]. The scheme can be used in combination with SHAKE (e.g., for freezing bond lengths) and with periodic boundary conditions. Results for solvated protein and nucleic-... [Pg.255]


See other pages where Linearity, evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.132]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.2279]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.2279]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.2174]    [Pg.2218]    [Pg.2466]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.655]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.355]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.102 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info