Evaluation criteria for

Short, S. A., R. P. Kennedy, T. R. Kipp, and W. H. Tong. Design and Evaluation Criteria for Potential Motor Detonations and the Arnold Engineering Development Center. Arnold Air Force Station, Tennessee, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force. November 1985. 

NATO Army Armaments Group (NAAG), Land Group 7 (Joint NBC Defence) Operational Requirements,Technical Specification and Evaluation Criteria for NBC Protective Clothing (AEP-38). Brussels NATO, 1998. 

As analyzed by philosophers, sociologists, and historians, perhaps the most striking characteristic of scientific work is its penchant for turning up new problems and its elaboration of evaluative criteria for choosing one theory over another. Scientific disciplines identify new problems and solve them. This happens within well-established disciplines and within areas of investigation that become new specialties or disciplines. It is the shared problemsolving activity, then, that initially establishes and ultimately prolongs the disciplinary identity. 

Accuracy, Precision, and Detection Limits — Analytical cost, accuracy, precision, and detection limits are the four main evaluation criteria for selecting an analytical method. Detection limit information will not be givdn here, as it is easily obtained from the literature or from instrument manufacturers. The analysis of NBS orchard leaves and bovine liver is often used to demonstrate the accuracy and precision of ICP analysis. We feel that the analysis of United States Geological Survey (USGS) and Canadian Centre for Mineral Energy Technology (CANMET) standard rocks, is a more rigorous test of ICP analytical accuracy because of the resistance to sample... 

Standardisation. The standardisation of systems is needed for accelerated development. Up to now, no unique and acknowledged evaluation criteria for fuel cells and components exists - which causes huge hurdles for new players in this technology area. Safety aspects need to be fitted to the emerging fuel cell technology. International standards must be generated. 

All aspects of the electronic records and electronic signature systems in place have been designed to provide a level of security and control equal to or exceeding the equivalent controls inherent to manual (paper) systems. This equivalency principle provides evaluative criteria for all electronic signatures. There is not a mandate to make a system perfect, error-free, or completely hacker-proof, although these are all appropriate ultimate goals rather, sufficient controls are required to assure that an electronic system is as secure or more secure than an equivalent manual system. 

We must define goals for green research and to consider evaluation criteria for green reagents. 

Eliminating the risk of a runaway reaction means reducing the severity (see Section 3.3.2). If we follow the evaluation criteria for such severity, we see that the energy released, by the desired as well as secondary reactions, should be reduced to a level leading to an adiabatic temperature rise below 50 K. This temperature increase would lead to a smooth temperature increase and not a runaway reaction. Different possibilities exist for reducing the energy release ... 

The Specialist Task Force on Analytical Databases established the mechanism of peer review of data for its inclusion into the OCAD. They also established the evaluation criteria for each type of data to be included in the OCAD, which they used as the basis for evaluating and accepting data. The Task Force reviewed each datum (spectrum) for technical validity. During the Preparatory Commission time, The Task Force recommended to the Expert Group on Inspection Procedures to approve the data the Task Force had evaluated and accepted. The PC would formally approve the data, which was later adopted by the CSP (see Figure 1). The current approval process is illustrated alongside the PC process for comparison purposes. 

DIN EN 13432 Packaging - Requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation - Test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging. 

The URS should then form the basis of the evaluation criteria for suppliers of EDMS. Selection of a Suppeier and System Integrator... 

Solvent. At the time of writing of thi.s paper, a final choice for a solvent has not been made. In the Group of Contractors it is clear that dichloromethane (DCM) cannot longer be used for various reasons (toxicity, volatility, safety). During the first year of the development of the Guideline, a number of alternative solvents will be evaluated. Criteria for this evaluation are set (see below in Chapter 4). The... 

Hattson J.S., Kennedy F.W. Evaluation Criteria for Granular Activated Carbons. JWPCF1971,43,No 11, pp. 2210-2217. 

In addition to satisfying entry and evaluative criteria for hormesis, a complementary perspective on the issue of whether the low-dose stimulation could have occurred by random process was devised. Of the nearly 1800 doses below the NOAEL, an assessment was made of the proportion of responses that statistically significantly differed from the control in the direction of hormesis or in the opposite direction. If the responses were random, one would expect that the response would vary similarly for either possibility. However, responses displaying statistical significance in the hormetic direction occurred 32 times more frequently than the opposite Thus, these findings strikingly support the conclusion that the hormetic responses cannot be explained by random processes (12). 

In the future, more transparency is needed with regard to the evaluation carried out by the Commission. For both old and new Member States, the evaluation criteria for the total quantity need to be more evident. There will always be Member States who consider the reduction of emissions a greater priority than others. If these Member States cannot be sure that other Member States with other priorities will not be permitted to interpret the Directive broadly when setting the total amount, they will think twice about endangering the competitiveness of their industry by ambitious allocations. (And let s not forget that industry pressure for more allowances can only be expected to be stronger and more effective after the lessons of the first allocation process.)... 

R. L. Webb and A. E. Bergles, Performance Evaluation Criteria for Selection of Heat Transfer Surface Geometries Used in Low Reynolds Number Heat Exchangers, in Low Reynolds Number Convection in Channels and Bundles, S. Kakac, R. H. Shah, and A. E. Bergles eds., Hemisphere, Washington, DC, and McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982. 

R. L. Webb, Performance Evaluation Criteria for Enhanced Tube Geometries Used in Two-Phase Heat Exchangers, in Heat Transfer Equipment Design, R. K. Shah, E. C. Subbarao, and R. A. Mashelkar eds., Hemisphere, New York, 1988. 

In the past 20 years the evaluation criteria for bioequivalence studies recommended by the FDA have evolved and been revised several times. For bioequivalence comparisons the new formulation or method of manufacture is the test product (7) and the prior formulation or method of manufacture is the reference (R) product. To establish bioequivalence, the difference between the bioavailability of the test product and the reference product must be within the prespecified bioequivalence limit as governed by the approach taken to assess bioequivalence, which is discussed in this section. 

We need to know all evaluation criteria for a given evaluation process. Unfortunately, selection of these criteria is entirely problem related. However, such criteria as expected cost, manufacturability, constructability, patentability, and novelty may be used. 

CFR 365, Subpart E, Appendix A — Explanation of Pre-Authorization Safety Audit Evaluation Criteria for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers. 

In order to facilitate the implementation of this nuclear safety design criterion DOE 5480.28, NATURAL PHENOMENA HAZARDS MITIGATION, specifies the requirements for each new and existing DOE facility. The evaluation criteria for this DOE Order are built around a graded approach. DOE 5480.28 specifies that an NPH analysis will be performed for all new and existing dOE faciI ities. Specifically ... 

DOE-STD-1020-94, Chg. 1 (1/96), Natural Phenomena Hazards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of Energy Facilities, specifies natural phenomena requirements and NPH design and evaluation criteria for DOE facilities and supports DOE Order 420.1. 

To have a true RCM strategy in place, RCM maintenance should comply with the JAlOll (Evaluation criteria for RCM processes) standard [17]. Numerous benefits can be gained by using RCM including [18] the lowering of maintenance... 

When the laboratory value is plotted against the NIR predicted value for the calibration sample set it may well be noted that some points lie well away from the computed regression line. This will, of course, reduce the correlation between laboratory and NIR data and increase the SEC or SEP. These samples may be outliers. The statistic hi describes the leverage or effect of an individual sample upon a regression. If a particular value of hi is exceeded this may be used to determine an outlier sample. Evaluation criteria for selecting outliers, howevei are somewhat subjective so there is a requirement for expertise in multivariate methods to make outlier selection effective. 

---