Environment Agency Subject

The 1991 Water Resources Act relates to the control of discharges to controlled waters. Section 85(1) states A person contravenes this section if he causes or knowingly permits any poisonous, noxious or polluting matter or any solid waste matter to enter any controlled waters . The Act defines controlled waters and provides for the Secretary of State to establish water-quality objectives and the attainment of these objectives. The Act provides powers to the Environment Agency to prosecute a consent-holder if conditions are breached and to serve a works notice on an offender requiring them to remove or alleviate the pollution. Section 190 of the Act also established registers that include details such as notices of water-quality objectives applications made for consents consents and the conditions to which the consents are subject samples of water or effluent taken by the [Agency] for the purposes of any of the water pollution provisions of this Act and information produced by analyses of those samples. 

The outcome of the Environment Agency s research on ecological risk assessment presents an approach which is similar to the many tiered systems that are already in existence. However, there is a lack of detail given on Tiers 2 and 3 and, as described above, the relationship of the GV-based approach to the requirements of the statutory guidance remains unclear. Subjects which were not covered, and which perhaps should have been, include the conversion of GVs between classes of organisms and the use of detailed wildlife risk assessment models (see, for example, Suter et al.s and US EPA6). 

This guide does not consider discharges of toxic materials into the environment. These are subject to agreement with the local authority and, where appropriate, the Environment Agency of the Department of the Environment. 

Some variants of the LOPA methodology determine the harm more precisely in terms of harm caused to people and harm to the environment. This approach, which is required by the tolerability of risk framework for human safety. Reducing risks, protecting people, requires consideration of additional factors such as the probability of ignition, the performance of containment systems, and the probability of fatality. For a similar perspective of environmental issues assessors should consult the relevant Environment Agency sector BAT guidance. All of these factors may be subject to considerable uncertainty, and the way the LOPA is carried out needs to reflect this uncertainty. Uncertainties are present in all calculations but sensitivity analysis can be used to help understand the uncertainty. 

Hazardous (special) waste is controlled waste which, because of its hazardous properties, is subject to additional controls imder the Hazardous Waste Regulations 2006. There are a number of guidance documents produced by regulatory authorities that further explain aspects of the definitions and the UK interpretations. The Environment Agency Special Waste Explanatory Notes are particularly helpful. 

The Water Services Companies are themselves subject to controls in the form of consents issued by the Environment Agency to control the release from the treatment works to controlled waters of effluent and sludges produced in the sewage purification process. 

Discharges to surface waters - in order to discharge to watercourses, consent from the Environment Agency is required. Disposal of new discharges by this route is usually subject to tight controls and is therefore not the usually favoured option. It is likely that disposal of effluent by this route will require treatment to strict limits. 

Processes giving rise to emissions to sewers or Red List substances. These are 23 substances inciuding mercury, cadmium and many pesticides which are subject to discharge consent to the satisfaction of the Environment Agency. 

Until recently, few papers appeared on the fate of dyes in the environment. But because of the importance of this subject, work is being done primarily by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the Ecological and Toxicological Association of the Dyestuff Manufacturing Industry (ETAD). 

According to a strict reading of the characteristics established by the U.S. EPA and the State environmental agencies, all of these items are hazardous wastes when disposed of, and should therefore be subject to the whole onerous spectrum of handling, transportation, and disposal requirements that have been established for toxins, carcinogens, mutagens, explosives, and other wastes that are threatening to health and the environment. 

William Randall Seeker received his Ph.D. in engineering (nuclear and chemical) from Kansas State University. He is the senior vice president and a member of the board of directors of Energy and Environmental Research Corporation. Dr. Seeker has extensive experience in the use of thermal treatment technologies and environmental control systems for managing hazardous waste. He is a member of the Executive Committee of the Environmental Protection Agency s Science Advisory Board. Dr. Seeker has authored over 100 technical papers on various aspects of technology and environment subjects. 

Member States or the Commission (via the Agency) can propose that the manufacture or use of specific substances is restricted, provided that a risk assessment has shown that the substances pose an unacceptable risk to human health or the environment. The risk assessment and the proposed restrictions must be considered within a set time period by a committee within the European Chemicals Agency (Article 67). The proposed restrictions are subject to a socio-economic analysis, considered by another committee within the Agency, and the opinion of both committees forwarded to the Commission. 

A further concern is the limited range of substances that will be subject to authorization. The criteria for PBT and vPvB substances (set out in Annex XIII) are very restrictive and will be met by very few substances. For substances of equivalent concern , such as endocrine disrupters, there must be scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment . This is a demanding requirement and it could therefore be the case that no substances become subject to authorization because they are endocrine disrupting. The number of substances that will be subject to authorization will also depend on the capacity of the European Chemicals Agency to deal with the applications. 

Methylenediphenyl diisocyanate can be released to the environment in waste stream emissions from sites of industrial manufacture and use. Toxic Release Inventory reports to the United States Environmental Protection Agency before at least the mid-1990s were subject to serious overestimation of the releases to the environment, because of errors in the way that the figures were calculated by industry. Within the European Union, total emissions from production sites in 1996 were about 43 kg and emissions from processing plants in the same year were about 7100 kg (European Union, 1999). 

Any change in material, product components, equipment, environment, methodology, or assays that could affect product quality or process reproducibility should be documented. It should be guaranteed that, after the alterations, the process results in a product that meets the specifications previously approved. All changes that might affect product quality or process reproducibility require revalidation and therefore should be subject to permission by the regulatory agencies (WHO, 1996 EC, 2001). 

---