Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Emulsion particle formation

Dubey NB, Windhab El (2013) Iron encapsulated microstructured emulsion-particle formation by prhhng process and its release kinetics. Journal of Food Engineering 115 198-206. [Pg.85]

Plasticizers soften the film and increase the adhesion and the setting speed. The most common are phthalates, adipates and benzoates. The amount added can be in a broad range of 10-50%. They affect the swelling and softening of the PVAc emulsion particles, ensure film formation at room temperature, and the tack of the still wet adhesive. They also provide improved moisture resistance of the bond. Disadvantages are the lower resistance of the bond line against heat, possible migration of the plasticizers and enhanced cold flow. [Pg.1078]

When the emulsion polymerization is conducted in the absence of an emulsifier, this process is termed emulsifier free or soapless emulsion polymerization [68-73]. In this case, the particle formation occurs by the precipitation of growing macroradicals within the continuous... [Pg.199]

Soapless seeded emulsion copolymerization has been proposed as an alternative method for the preparation of uniform copolymer microspheres in the submicron-size range [115-117]. In this process, a small part of the total monomer-comonomer mixture is added into the water phase to start the copolymerization with a lower monomer phase-water ratio relative to the conventional direct process to prevent the coagulation and monodispersity defects. The functional comonomer concentration in the monomer-comonomer mixture is also kept below 10% (by mole). The water phase including the initiator is kept at the polymerization temperature during and after the addition of initial monomer mixture. The nucleation takes place by the precipitation of copolymer macromolecules, and initially formed copolymer nuclei collide and form larger particles. After particle formation with the initial lower organic phase-water ratio, an oligomer initiated in the continuous phase is... [Pg.217]

Emulsion polymerizations most often involve the use of water-soluble initiators (e.g. persulfate see 33.2.6.1) and polymer chains are initiated in the aqueous phase. A number of mechanisms for particle formation and entry have been described, however, a full discussion of these is beyond the scope of this book. Readers are referred to recent texts on emulsion polymerization by Gilbert4 and Lovell and El-Aasser43 for a more comprehensive treatment. [Pg.63]

If the secondary stream contains emulsifier it can function in three ways. When the emulsion feed is started quickly the added emulsifier can serve to lengthen the particle formation period and hence to broaden the particle size distribution. When the emulsion feed is started later and added in such a manner that the emulsifier is promptly adsorbed on existing particles, one can obtain quite narrow size distributions. If the emulsion feed is started later but added rapidly enough to generate free emulsifier in the reaction mixture a second population of particles can be formed, again yielding a broad size distribution. [Pg.8]

The physical picture of emulsion polymerization is complex due to the presence of multiple phases, multiple monomers, radical species, and other ingredients, an extensive reaction and particle formation mechanism, and the possibility of many modes of reactor operation. [Pg.361]

We begin the discussion of EPM by elaborating on this physical picture. Figure 1 shows a typical emulsion CSTR reactor and polymerization recipe. The magnified portion of the latex shows the various phases and the major species involved. The latex consists of monomers, water, surfactant, initiator, chain transfer agent, and added electrolyte. We used the mechanism for particle formation as described in Feeney et al. (8-9) and Hansen and Ugelstad (2). We have not found it necessary to invoke the micellar entry theory 2, 2/ 6./ 11/ 12/ 14. [Pg.361]

By emulsion copolymerization (ECP) of self-emulsifying unsaturated polyesters (EUP) and bifunctional monomers, such as styrene (S), microgels may be prepared which have a rather uniform diameter [109]. This uniformity of size is due to a special mechanism of particle formation involved in using EUP as comonomers. [Pg.159]

Retention of the size emulsion particle in the wet web during sheet formation. [Pg.124]

The particle characteristics such as particle size, crg, yield, and particle number density were independent on the reaction time and temperature examined in the formation of Fe203 particles from an emulsion state. However, the particle characteristics are generally influenced by the reaction time and temperature in the particle formation from the hydrolysis in alcohol solution, because the reaction time and temperature promote the hydrolysis reaction. [Pg.49]

Acrylonitrile (Figure 9) shows two periods of almost constant but different absolute reaction rates, followed by a period of first-order reaction rate at a high conversion. This monomer is somewhat similar to vinylidene chloride since it also does not swell in its own polymer. On the other hand acrylonitrile has a water solubility roughly three orders of magnitude higher than vinylidene chloride or styrene and even higher than methyl acrylate (see Table I). We therefore have to assume particle formation in the aqueous phase, as was done for methyl acrylate emulsions. [Pg.207]

These stabilizers are added to the formulation in order to stabilize the emulsion formed during particle preparation. These stabilizers, however, can also influence the properties of the particles formed. The type and concentration of the stabilizer selected may affect the particle size. Being present at the boundary layer between the water phase and the organic phase during particle formation, the stabilizer can also be incorporated on the particle surface, modifying particle properties such as particle zeta potential and mucoadhesion (203). Other polymers have also been evaluated as stabilizers in earlier studies such as cellulosic derivatives methylcellu-lose (MC), hydroxyethylcellulose ( ), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), as well as gelatin type A and B, carbomer and poloxamer (203). [Pg.356]

The emulsion polymerization of vinyl hexanoate has been studied to determine the effect of chain transfer on the polymerization kinetics of a water-insoluble monomer. Both unseeded and seeded runs were made. For unseeded polymerizations, the dependence of particle concentration on soap is much higher than Smith-Ewart predictions, indicating multiple particle formation per radical because of chain transfer. Once the particles have formed, the kinetics are much like those of styrene. The lower water solubility of vinyl hexanoate when compared with styrene apparently negates its increased chain transfer, since the monomer radicals cannot diffuse out of the particles. [Pg.182]

Vinyl caproate in emulsion polymerization behaves like styrene in most respects. The rate is first order in monomer. In the range of 1015 to 10"16 particles/cc, it depends on Np to the 0.75 power. This is higher than that for styrene in this range, Rp oc Np°5, indicating that there is less diffusion into the aqueous phase for vinyl caproate. However, the mechanism of particle formation for vinyl caproate may not fit the Smith-Ewart mechanism because of the high chain transfer rate to monomer. [Pg.187]

The emulsifier provides sites for the particle nucleation and stabilizes growing or the final polymer particles. Even though conventional emulsifiers (anionic, cationic, and nonionic) are commonly used in emulsion polymerization, other non-conventional ones are also used they include reactive emulsifiers and amphiphilic macromonomers. Reactive emulsifiers and macromonomers, which are surface active emulsifiers with an unsaturated group, are chemically bound to the surface of polymer particles. This strongly reduces the critical amount of emulsifier needed for stabilization of polymer particles, desorption of emulsifier from particles, formation of distinct emulsifier domains during film formation, and water sensitivity of the latex film. [Pg.13]

The present review paper, therefore, refers firstly to the particle formation mechanism in emulsion polymerization, the complete understanding of which is indispensable for establishing a correct kinetic model, and then, deals with the present subject, that is, what type of reactor and operating conditions are the most suitable for a continuous emulsion polymerization process from the standpoint of increasing the volume efficiency and the stability of the reactors. [Pg.125]

In continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene in a series of CSTR s, it was clarified that almost all the particles formed in the first reactor (.2/2) Since the rate of polymerization is, under normal reaction conditions, proportional to the number of polymer particles present, the number of succeeding reactors after the first can be decreased if the number of polymer particles produced in the first stage reactor is increased. This can be realized by increasing emulsifier and initiator concentrations in the feed stream and by lowering the temperature of the first reactor where particle formation is taking place (2) The former choice is not desirable because production cost and impurities which may be involved in the polymers will increase. The latter practice could be employed in parallel with the technique given in this paper. [Pg.126]

Our final goal in the present paper is to devise an optimal type of the first stage reactor and its operation method which will maximize the number of polymer particles produced in continuous emulsion polymerization. For this purpose, we need a mathematical reaction model which explains particle formation and other kinetic behavior of continuous emulsion polymerization of styrene. [Pg.126]

Utilizing the seed latex polymerization method to avoid the occurance of new particle formation, the kinetic treatment of an emulsion polymerization is quite straight forward. Assuming that all the particles are the same size, the rate of polymerization,... [Pg.328]

The utility of the analytical predictor method of dead-time compensation to control of conversion in a train of continuous emulsion polymerizers has been demonstrated by simulation of the vinyl acetate system. The simulated results clearly show the extreme difficulty of controlling the conversion in systems which are operated at Msoap-starvedM conditions. The analytical predictor was shown, however, to provide significantly improved control of conversion, in presence of either setpoint or load changes, as compared to standard feedback systems in operating regions that promote continuous particle formation. These simulations suggest the analytical predictor technique to be the preferred method of control when it is desired that only one variable (preferably initiator feed rate) be manipulated. [Pg.559]

In the present work the conditions used to obtain uniform growth of the seeded particles, in a single step, in the emulsion polymerization of VC, are reported (4), in particular, we show that limited emulsifier is not sufficient to prevent new particle formation. A qualitative interpretation of results is suggested. [Pg.176]


See other pages where Emulsion particle formation is mentioned: [Pg.626]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.603]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.399]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.121 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.759 , Pg.760 , Pg.761 , Pg.762 , Pg.763 , Pg.764 ]




SEARCH



Emulsion formation

Particle formation

Particle formation rate, emulsion

Particles emulsion

Poly emulsion particle formation

© 2024 chempedia.info