Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Predictor method, analytical

Several control techniques have been developed to compensate for large dead-times in processes and have recently been reviewed by Gopalratnam, et al. (4). Among the most effective of these techniques and the one which appears to be most readily applicable to continuous emulsion polymerization is the analytical predictor method of dead-time compensation (DTC) originally proposed by Moore ( 5). The analytical predictor has been demonstrated by Doss and Moore (6) for a stirred tank heating system and by Meyer, et al. (7) for distillation column control in the only experimental applications presently in the literature. Implementation of the analytical predictor method to monomer conversion control in a train of continuous emulsion polymerization reactors is the subject of this paper. [Pg.529]

The utility of the analytical predictor method of dead-time compensation to control of conversion in a train of continuous emulsion polymerizers has been demonstrated by simulation of the vinyl acetate system. The simulated results clearly show the extreme difficulty of controlling the conversion in systems which are operated at Msoap-starvedM conditions. The analytical predictor was shown, however, to provide significantly improved control of conversion, in presence of either setpoint or load changes, as compared to standard feedback systems in operating regions that promote continuous particle formation. These simulations suggest the analytical predictor technique to be the preferred method of control when it is desired that only one variable (preferably initiator feed rate) be manipulated. [Pg.559]

To improve the performance of time-delay systems, special control algorithms have been developed to provide time-delay compensation. The Smith predictor technique is the best-known algorithm a related method is called the analytical predictor. Various investigators have... [Pg.24]

D APC ASTEEM BC CAM3 Three-dimensional The analytical predictor of condensation The adaptive step time-split explicit Euler method Black carbon The community atmospheric model v. 3 ... [Pg.33]

The set of possible dependent properties and independent predictor variables, i.e. the number of possible applications of predictive modelling, is virtually boundless. A major application is in analytical chemistry, specifically the development and application of quantitative predictive calibration models, e.g. for the simultaneous determination of the concentrations of various analytes in a multi-component mixture where one may choose from a large arsenal of spectroscopic methods (e.g. UV, IR, NIR, XRF, NMR). The emerging field of process analysis,... [Pg.349]

Garg MB, Sevester JC, Sakoff JA et al. Simple liquid chromatographic method for the determination of uracil and dihydrouracil plasma levels a potential pretreatment predictor of 5-fluorouracil toxicity. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2002 774 223-230. [Pg.263]

When the quadrature of eq 2 cannot be performed analytically the integration should be carried out numerically by robust routines such as the Runge-Kutta, Adams-Moulton predictor-corrector or Bulirsch-Stoer methods with step size and error control [53, 55, 56], These routines can also be found in computer codings at Netlib and in standard books on computer codes [53]. [Pg.317]

Analytical unreliability may arise when new analysts or operators, samples, methods, or instruments are introduced. Loss of an analyst or operator and replacement by another is a common predictor of unreliability in analytical results, as is the shift of an analyst or operator to a new assignment or a temporary one for a vacation period or heavy workload. Thorough education and training can help prevent bad analyses that are caused by unfamiliarity with a process. [Pg.246]

Decision aids need to be designed carefully. With the goal of providing assistance to the human controller, automated systems may provide feedforward (as well as feedback) information. Predictor displays show the operator one or more future states of the process parameters, as well as their present state or value, through a fast-time simulation, a mathematical model, or other analytic method that projects forward the effects of a particular control action or the progression of a disturbance if nothing is done about it. [Pg.298]

Injury tolerance in brain injury can be classified into two categories. The first considers acceleration-based empirical methods, while the second focuses on analytical brain injury predictors. The former categoiy is discussed in detail here, while the latter will only be briefly highlighted. [Pg.111]

MLR is a method used to estimate the size and statistical significance of the relationship between a dependent variable (y) and one independent or predictor variable, (x ), after adjustment for confounders (X2,...). As discussed earlier, models constructed from spectroscopy are relatively simple due to linear combinations of the instrumental measurements. Models for a broader range of conditions (i.e., measurements from several wavelengths) have been constructed in order to separate overlapping peaks elicited from the analyte plus other unknown components or conditions. These multiple linear methods for separating outliers are based upon the following equation ... [Pg.593]

As mentioned, PCR is a two-step process the PC scores and the PC loadings are calculated with the PC scores regressed against the analyte concentrations using a regression method. In PCR, the PC scores are chosen to describe as much of the variation in the predictors as possible. The total variance of the experimental dataset and the sum of the eigenvalues... [Pg.594]

Eor multivariate calibration in analytical chemistry, the partial least squares (PLS) method [19], is very efficient. Here, the relations between a set of predictors and a set (not just one) of response variables are modeled. In multicomponent calibration the known concentrations of / components in n calibration samples are collected to constitute the response matrix Y (n rows, / columns). Digitization of the spectra of calibration samples using p wavelengths yields the predictor matrix X (n rows, p columns). The relations between X and Y are modeled by latent variables for both data sets. These latent variables (PLS components) are constructed to exhaust maximal variance (information) within both data sets on the one hand and to be maximally correlated for the purpose of good prediction on the other hand. From the computational viewpoint, solutions are obtained by a simple iterative procedure. Having established the model for calibration samples. comp>o-nent concentrations for future mixtures can be predicted from their spectra. A survey of multi-component regression is contained in [20],... [Pg.59]

Fault tolerant design for reliability is one of the most difficult tasks to verify, evaluate, and validate. It is either time-consuming or very costly. This requires creating a number of models. Fault injection is an effective method to validate fault tolerant mechanisms. Also an amount of modeling is necessary for error/fault environment and structure and behavior of the design, etc. It is then necessary to determine how well the fault tolerant mechanisms work by analytic studies and fault simulations [7]. The results from these models after analyses shall include but not be limited to error rate, fault rate, latency, etc. Some of the better known tools are HARP—hybrid automated reliability predictor (Duke), SAVE—system availability estimator (IBM), and SHARPE—symbolic hierarchical automated reliability and performance evaluator (Duke). [Pg.820]

The above set of equations do not have an analytical solution in general, and therefore a numerical solution had to be used. A predictor-corrector method was employed, details of which can be found in Henry and Ariman [21]. [Pg.161]

Fourth-order Runge-Kutta and various predictor-corrector methods have been used successfully for reaction path following, especially on analytical potential energy surfaces. Page and Mclver have extended the LQA and CLQA methods... [Pg.2435]

To test the applicability of this theoretical framework in sediment, and to verify predicted exposures, bioassay(/5) and pore water sampling procedures (16J7) were developed and analytical methods were adapted to quantify the freely-dissolved concentrations (13J8). In laboratory exposures, sediment organic carbon in combination with compound were found to be good predictors of freely-dissolved chemical and organism response (19,20). [Pg.264]


See other pages where Predictor method, analytical is mentioned: [Pg.733]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.1358]    [Pg.225]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.534 , Pg.535 , Pg.536 , Pg.546 , Pg.564 ]




SEARCH



Analytical predictor

Predictors

© 2024 chempedia.info