Empirical models application ranges

An extreme case of these empirical models are black box models, predominantly polynomials, the application of which is strictly restricted to the range of operating conditions and design variables for which the models were developed. Even in this range, optimization using black box models can lead to operating conditions far from the real optimum. This is due to non-linearities of the real systems, which cannot be modelled by polynomials. Black box... 

The electrostatic precipitator in Example 2.2 is typical of industrial processes the operation of most process equipment is so complicated that application of fundamental physical laws may not produce a suitable model. For example, thermodynamic or chemical kinetics data may be required in such a model but may not be available. On the other hand, although the development of black box models may require less effort and the resulting models may be simpler in form, empirical models are usually only relevant for restricted ranges of operation and scale-up. Thus, a model such as ESP model 1 might need to be completely reformulated for a different size range of particulate matter or for a different type of coal. You might have to use a series of black box models to achieve suitable accuracy for different operating conditions. 

The concept of the reaction-rate model should be considered to be more flexible than any mechanistically oriented view will allow. In particular, for any reacting system an entire spectrum of models is possible, each of which fits certain overlapping ranges of the experimental variables. This spectrum includes the purely empirical models, models accurately describing every detail of the reaction mechanism, and many models between these extremes. In most applications, we should proceed as far toward the theoretical extreme as is permitted by optimum use of our resources of time and money. For certain industrial applications, for example, the closer the model approaches... 

This type of model is compatible with complex feedstocks (21,22), where limited understanding of the mechanisms involved and the size of the reaction network preclude stoichiometric modeling. Its range of applicability depends not only on the extent of data base used to estimate model parameters, but on the degree to which its empirical framework reflects true kinetics. This approach will be illustrated later. 

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a well-known statistical technique (1-3) used to define the relationships of one or more process output variables (responses) to one or more process input variables (factors) when the mechanism underlying the process is either not well understood or is too complicated to allow an exact predictive model to be formulated from theory. This is a necessity in process validation, where limits must be set on the input variables of a process to assure that the product will meet predetermined specifications and quality characteristics. Response data are collected from the process under designed operating conditions, or specified settings of one or more factors, and an empirical mathematical function (model) is fitted to the data to define the relationships between process inputs and outputs. This empirical model is then used to predict the optimum ranges of the response variables and to determine the set of operating conditions which will attain that optimum. Several examples listed in Table 1 exhibit the applications of RSM to processes, factors, and responses in process validation situations. 

Due to the data missing for the phenomenological models and the fact that these models are mostly not verified, the empirical and semi-empirical models are probably the best for the rapid practical applications required in risk assessments. Information in Tables 1 and 2 are data based on full scale fire tests carried out from approximately 1990 to present. Ref. 2 also presents data for other five fire types, but only the data summarised in Table 1 are used in this Paper as they show together with the data in Table 2 the widest range. 

There have been two different approaches to model development for predicting iodine behaviour for conditions expected to be typical of an accident empirical (IMPAIR, lODE, TRENDS, IMOD) and mechanistic (INSPECT, LIRIC). The ISP exercise established that both the mechanistic and empirical modelling approaches are reasonable since all of the models were able to reproduce the test results. Currently, there are only a few tests that can be used to validate the models over a wide range of conditions. As a result, the applicability of most of the codes is limited and the uncertainty limits are not well defined. 

Heuristic, empirical models can be useful for disseminating the results of corrosion research, as long as the applications are within the range of the data and boundary conditions that the model is built on. These approaches include expert systems and data mining modeling (including semi-empirical, statistical, pattern recognition, neural networks, etc.) models. 

This study was undertaken to test the ability of our previous molecular connectivity models to accurately predict the soil sorption coefficients, bioconcentration factors, and acute toxicities in fish of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), alkylbenzenes, alkenylbenzenes, chlorobenzenes, polychlorinated biphenyls, chlorinated alkanes and alkenes, heterocyclic arid substituted PAHs, and halogenated phenols. Tests performed on large groups of such compounds clearly demonstrate that these simple nonempirical models accurately predict the soil sorption coefficients, bioconcentration factors, and acute toxicities in fish of the above compounds. Moreover, they outperform traditional empirical models based on 1-octanol/ water partition coefficients or water solubilities in accuracy, speed, and range of applicability. These results show that the molecular connectivity models are a very accurate predictive tool for the soil sorption coefficients, bioconcentration factors, and acute toxicities in fish of a wide range of organic chemicals and that it can be confidently used to rank potentially hazardous chemicals and thus to create a priority testing list. ... 

In summary, this comparative analysis of the molecular connectivity model versus two most commonly used empirical models shows that the molecular connectivity model is clearly superior to empirical models based on 1-octanol/water partition coefficients or water solubility in accuracy, performance, and range of applicability. Our future plans are to extend this highly successful nonempirical model to more polar and possibly ionic chemicals. 

As already discussed in the previous chapters, process behavior is usually non-Unear. Whether or not the empirical model to be developed should also be non-linear depends on the operating range in which the model will be used. If the process is controlled and the operating range is small, a linear process model may be an adequate approximation of reality. The application of the model will determine whether the model needs to be dynamic or static. For control and prediction type applications, models are usually dynamic. 

In the numerical computation, the model equations should be firstly discrete into a large number of small finite elements and solved by algebraic method. Thus, the empirical correlations can be appUed to the discrete elements under their local conditions, such as velocity, concentration, and temperature obtained in the comse of numerical computation. Note that the local conditions should be within the applicable range of the correlation. 

The Darcy-Weisbach Equation applies to a wide range of fluids, while the Hazen-Williams Equation is based on empirical data and is used primarily in water modeling applications. Each of these methods calculates friction losses as a function of the velocity of the fluid and some measure of the pipe s resistance to flow (pipe wall roughness). Typical pipe roughness values for these methods are shown in Table 3.3. These values can vary depending on the product manufacturer, workmanship, age, and many other factors. 

An advantage of using a theoretical model to describe diffusion through porous media over empirical models is that they are applicable over a wider range of moisture contents. Theoretical models have been derived (Millington and Shearer, 1971 Troeh et al1982 Nielson et al., 1984), but they are generally more mathematically complex, and require data that is not readily available such as pore-size distributions. 

As described above, a number of empirical and analytical correlations for droplet sizes have been established for normal liquids. These correlations are applicable mainly to atomizer designs, and operation conditions under which they were derived, and hold for fairly narrow variations of geometry and process parameters. In contrast, correlations for droplet sizes of liquid metals/alloys available in published literature 318]f323ff328]- 3311 [485]-[487] are relatively limited, and most of these correlations fail to provide quantitative information on mechanisms of droplet formation. Many of the empirical correlations for metal droplet sizes have been derived from off-line measurements of solidified particles (powders), mainly sieve analysis. In addition, the validity of the published correlations needs to be examined for a wide range of process conditions in different applications. Reviews of mathematical models and correlations for... 

The calculation of backscatter coefficients via the approach outlined above is mathematically complex. Heidenreich 44) developed a simple empirical backscatter model which is applicable to resist exposure being based on the direct observation of chemical changes produced by backscat-tered electrons at different accelerating voltages on several substrates. The model is independent of scattering trajectory and energy dissipation calculations and is essentially a radial exponential decay of backscatter current density out to the backscatter radius determined by electron range. 

---