Backscattered current

The calculation of backscatter coefficients via the approach outlined above is mathematically complex. Heidenreich 44) developed a simple empirical backscatter model which is applicable to resist exposure being based on the direct observation of chemical changes produced by backscat-tered electrons at different accelerating voltages on several substrates. The model is independent of scattering trajectory and energy dissipation calculations and is essentially a radial exponential decay of backscatter current density out to the backscatter radius determined by electron range. 

From the expressions (1), (2), (4) and (5), it becomes clear that only on the relatively clean spots, can one observe the inelastic backscattering current 5Iph(V) provided the excess current term 6/(V) is negligible. The latter can be cancelled by the suppression of superconductivity either by a magnetic field or temperature. On the other hand, in the SC state, for dirty contacts, all the inelastic terms are very small, and the main non-linearity is provided by the A(eF)-dependence on the excess current. 

The phonon structure in the PC spectra of MgB2 can be revealed by i) the inelastic backscattering current, like for ordinary PCS, and ii) by the energy dependence of the excess current. They can be discriminated after destroying the superconductivity by magnetic field and/or temperature, and by varying the electron mean free path. 

These signals can be used to form complementary images. As the beam current is increased, each of these currents will also increase. The backscattered electron yield 11 and the secondary electron yield 8, which refer to the number of backscattered and secondary electrons emitted per incident electron, respectively, are defined by the relationships ... 

RBS spectra were obtained using a 2.120 MeV He+2 ion beam at a backscattering angle of 162. The spectra were accumulated for a total ion dose of 40 uC using a 10 nA beam current. The number of Ti atoms/cm2 in the sample was calculated by comparison to spectra for a standard Si wafer implanted with a known dose of Sb. 

Bubble-size control was also critical. The intensity of scattering by nonresonant gas bubbles is proportional to the sixth power of the radius of the bubble. Hence, the larger the bubble, the better the scattering intensity. However, the acceptable upper size limit for in vivo administration is determined by the need for bubbles to cross capillary beds. Bubbles larger than 6-8 pm should be avoided as they are trapped in the lung capillaries. The current accepted sizes are in 1-7 pm, preferably around 3 pm, with as narrow a size distribution as possible. Bubble shell material needs to be biodegradable. Soft shells are generally preferable, as they minimally impede US backscatter. 

This expression becomes 0 at g = 1/2. We also get a zero ratchet current for non-interacting electrons, g = 1, because the Hamiltonian (1) is quadratic in Fermi-operators in the non-interacting case and hence no operators which backscatter more than one electron can appear, = 0. 

Current research interest is in the solid phase epitaxial regrowth of amorphous Si using laser processing. RBS has been used to follow the melting and recrystallization of the crystal-amorphous interface (12). This is accomplished by monitoring the backscattered spectrum+with the substrate oriented in a direction that will allow the He to channel along the crystal planes. 

---