Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface electron affinity

NEA surfaces differ from classical photoemissive surfaces in that conduction band electrons require no excess thermal energy above to escape. It is a cold electron emission device, while in classical positive electron affinity surfaces a small barrier is present at the surface and either hot electron escape or tunneling of thermalized electrons is required for emission. NEA and classical electron emission are contrasted in Fig. 5.8 [5.67]. Part (a) is a classical emitter, (b) is a p-type semiconductor treated to obtain NEA, and (c) is an n-type semiconductor similarly treated but without attaining NEA. (Many details of this figure are clarified in later sections.)... [Pg.165]

Some surfaces exhibit very low or negative electron affinity... [Pg.76]

What happens with the outer orbitals of an atom when it approaches a metal surface Discuss the role of the atom s ionization potential and electron affinity in relation to the work function of the metal for the strength of the eventual chemisorption bond. [Pg.408]

Indeed, in this case the formation of neutral surface compound (Me Of-) is accompanied by binding of neutral superstoichiometric Me and, therefore, decrease in concentration of donors responsible for dope electric conductivity of adsorbent. In the case when the formed surface state possesses sufficient electron affinity one can-... [Pg.121]

The high potentials required for electrospray show that air at atmospheric pressure is not only a convenient, but also a very suitable ambient gas for ES, particularly when solvents with high surface tension, like water, are to be subjected to electrospray. The oxygen in the air, which has a positive electron affinity, captures free electrons and acts as a discharge suppressor. [Pg.266]

When the sample is biased positively (Ub > 0) with respect to the tip, as in Fig. 9c, and assuming that the molecular potential is essentially that of the substrate [85], only the normal elastic current flows at low bias (<1.5 V). As the bias increases, electrons at the Fermi surface of the tip approach, and eventually surpass, the absolute energy of an unoccupied molecular orbital (the LUMO at +1.78 V in Fig. 9c). OMT through the LUMO at — 1.78 V below the vacuum level produces a peak in dl/dV, seen in the actual STM based OMTS data for nickel(II) octaethyl-porphyrin (NiOEP). If the bias is increased further, higher unoccupied orbitals produce additional peaks in the OMTS. Thus, the positive sample bias portion of the OMTS is associated with electron affinity levels (transient reductions). In reverse (opposite) bias, as in Fig. 9b, the LUMO never comes into resonance with the Fermi energy, and no peak due to unoccupied orbitals is seen. However, occupied orbitals are probed in reverse bias. In the NiOEP case, the HOMO at... [Pg.202]

Depending on the electron affinity of the catalyst, one of these two routes predominates. The dependence of the hydroperoxide decomposition rate on [ROOH] is in agreement with the conception of preliminary equilibrium sorption of hydroperoxide on the catalyst surface (Me2PhCOOH, AgO, 16m2 L 343 K) [263]). The equilibrium constant was estimated to be K 1 mol L and effective rate constant of described ROOH decomposition is /cis = 70s I[263]. [Pg.423]

It is now well established that when a surface presents electron donor or electron acceptor sites, it is possible to ionize molecules of relatively high electron affinity (> 2 eV) or low ionization potential values, resulting in paramagnetic radical ions. For instance anthracene and perylene are easily positively ionized on alumina (7 ) (IP = 7.2 and 6.8 eV respectively). The adsorption at room temperature of benzenic solution of perylene, anthracene and napthalene on H-ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-11 samples heated up to 800°C prior to adsorption did not give rise to the formation of the corresponding radical cation. For samples outgassed at high... [Pg.264]

The work function of the rubbing surfaces and the electron affinity of additives are interconnected on the molecular level. This mechanism has been discussed in terms of tribopolymerization models as a general approach to boundary lubrication (Kajdas 1994, 2001). To evaluate the validity of the anion-radical mechanism, two metal systems were investigated, a hard steel ball on a softer steel plate and a hard ball on an aluminum plate. Both metal plates emit electrons under friction, but aluminum produced more exoelectrons than steel. With aluminum, the addition of 1% styrene to the hexadecane lubricating fluid reduced the wear volume of the plate by over 65%. This effect considerably predominates that of steel on steel. Friction initiates polymerization of styrene, and this polymer formation was proven. It was also found that lauryl methacrylate, diallyl phthalate, and vinyl acetate reduced wear in an aluminum pin-on-disc test by 60-80% (Kajdas 1994). [Pg.426]


See other pages where Surface electron affinity is mentioned: [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.2397]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.288]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.172 ]




SEARCH



Electron affinity

Electron affinity potential energy surfaces

Electronic affinity

Electrons electron affinity

Surface electronic

Surface electrons

Surface potential electron affinity

© 2024 chempedia.info