Surface potential electron affinity

VAMP can be used with Tsar to provide quantum mechanically calculated descriptors for QSAR. Apart from molecular properties such as dipole, quadrupole, and octupole moments, ionization potential, electron affinity, polarizability (calculated as a default in VAMP by a variational method), etc., atomic properties such as Coulson-, Mulliken-, or MEP-derived charges, chemical shifts and atomic dipoles and quadrupoles, VAMP can also calculate surface electrostatic descriptors introduced by Politzer, and is useful for QSARs and QSPRs involving intermolecular interactions. Many of these descriptors can be exported directly into Tsar for analysis by classical regression techniques or artificial neural nets. ... 

What happens with the outer orbitals of an atom when it approaches a metal surface Discuss the role of the atom s ionization potential and electron affinity in relation to the work function of the metal for the strength of the eventual chemisorption bond. 

The high potentials required for electrospray show that air at atmospheric pressure is not only a convenient, but also a very suitable ambient gas for ES, particularly when solvents with high surface tension, like water, are to be subjected to electrospray. The oxygen in the air, which has a positive electron affinity, captures free electrons and acts as a discharge suppressor. 

When the sample is biased positively (Ub > 0) with respect to the tip, as in Fig. 9c, and assuming that the molecular potential is essentially that of the substrate [85], only the normal elastic current flows at low bias (<1.5 V). As the bias increases, electrons at the Fermi surface of the tip approach, and eventually surpass, the absolute energy of an unoccupied molecular orbital (the LUMO at +1.78 V in Fig. 9c). OMT through the LUMO at — 1.78 V below the vacuum level produces a peak in dl/dV, seen in the actual STM based OMTS data for nickel(II) octaethyl-porphyrin (NiOEP). If the bias is increased further, higher unoccupied orbitals produce additional peaks in the OMTS. Thus, the positive sample bias portion of the OMTS is associated with electron affinity levels (transient reductions). In reverse (opposite) bias, as in Fig. 9b, the LUMO never comes into resonance with the Fermi energy, and no peak due to unoccupied orbitals is seen. However, occupied orbitals are probed in reverse bias. In the NiOEP case, the HOMO at... 

It is now well established that when a surface presents electron donor or electron acceptor sites, it is possible to ionize molecules of relatively high electron affinity (> 2 eV) or low ionization potential values, resulting in paramagnetic radical ions. For instance anthracene and perylene are easily positively ionized on alumina (7 ) (IP = 7.2 and 6.8 eV respectively). The adsorption at room temperature of benzenic solution of perylene, anthracene and napthalene on H-ZSM-5 and H-ZSM-11 samples heated up to 800°C prior to adsorption did not give rise to the formation of the corresponding radical cation. For samples outgassed at high... 

As the size of a semiconductor crystal becomes small a regime is entered in which the electronic properties, e.g. ionization potential and electron affinity, are determined by size and shape of the crystals [113], When a quantum of light (hv) with energy exceeding the band gap falls on the surface of a semiconductor crystal there appears a bounded electron-hole pair known as an exciton... 

The kineties of eleetron-transfer reactions, which is also affected by the electrode potential and the metal-water interface, is more difficult and complex to treat than the thermodynamic aspects. While the theoretical development for electron transfer kinetics began decades ago, a practical implementation for surface reactions is still unavailable. Popular transition state-searching techniques such as the NEB method are not designed to search for minimum-energy reaction paths subject to a constant potential. Approximations that allow affordable quantum chemistry calculations to get around this limitation have been proposed, ranging from the electron affinity/ionization potential matching method to heuristic arguments based on interpolations. 

The electric field at a pure metal surface is the origin of the work function Co of escaping electrons. The potential which must be overcome is at the same time a measure of the electron affinity of the metal surface. If adsorption of polarizable molecules occurs on the metal surface, J will be changed by an amount A4>. For a sufficient electronic polarizability of the adsorbed molecule, is negative if the electron affinity of the metal surface predominates so that electrons are shifted toward the metal surface. is positive if the electron affinity of the foreign molecule predominates, in which case metal electrons are shifted in the direction of the adsorbed molecule. 

If the reaction of interest is exothermic, the reaction can proceed without loading rare metals, which are usually quite expensive. In this case, surface heterogeneity of potentials may be caused by a surface defect or nonstoichiometry. Adsorption of reactant molecules possessing a positive electron affinity can act as a source of the potential drop near the surface of the semiconductor. 

The energy with which electrons are bound in conducting materials is known as the electron affinity of the material. Materials with a high electron affinity bind electrons strongly and exhibit noble behavior (i.e., are relatively inert and do not oxidize spontaneously in air). Gold is an example. On the other hand, metals such as aluminum or copper are less noble and their surfaces, once exposed to air, are readily oxidized. When two dissimilar electronic conductors are placed in contact with each other, electrons flow from the material that is less noble (e.g., copper) to the more noble material (e.g., palladium) until an equilibrium is reached and the contact potential is formed at their junction. Because of the multitude of possible combinations of conductors in the real world, contact potential is the most ubiquitous of all junction potentials. 

---