Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Electrode kinetics transfer resistance

In Chapter 1, Figure 1.4 shows a typical polarization curve of a PEM fuel cell. The voltage loss of a cell is determined by its OCV, electrode kinetics, ohmic resistance (dominated by the membrane resistance), and mass transfer property. In experiments, the OCV can be measured directly. If the ohmic resistance (Rm). kinetic resistance (Rt, also known as charge transfer resistance), and mass transfer resistance (Rmt) are known, the fuel cell performance is easily simulated. As described in Chapter 3, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) has been introduced as a powerfiil diagnostic technique to obtain these resistances. By using the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 3.3, Rm, Rt, and R t can be simulated based on EIS data. [Pg.131]

As the immunocomplex structure is generally electroinactive, its coverage on the electrode surface will decrease the double layer capacitance and retard the interfacial electron transfer kinetics of a redox probe present in the electrolyte solution. In this case, Ra can be expressed as the sum of the electron transfer resistance of the bare electrode CRbare) and that of the electrode immobilized with an immunocomplex (R immun) ... [Pg.159]

As expected, the impedance responses obtained in practice do not fully match that of the model of Fig. 9.13. However, as shown by the typical case of Fig. 9.14 which illustrates the response obtained for a 5 mol% ClO -doped polypyrrole electrode in contact with a LiC104-propylene carbonate solution (Panero et al, 1989), the trend is still reasonably close enough to the idealised one to allow (possibly with the help of fitting programmes) the determination of the relevant kinetics parameters, such as the charge transfer resistance, the double-layer capacitance and the diffusion coefficient. [Pg.253]

Figure 10. Resistor-network representation of porous-electrode theory. The total current density, i, flows through the electrolyte phase (2) and the solid phase (1) at each respective end. Between, the current is apportioned on the basis of the resistances in each phase and the charge-transfer resistances. The charge-transfer resistances can be nonlinear because they are based on kinetic expressions. Figure 10. Resistor-network representation of porous-electrode theory. The total current density, i, flows through the electrolyte phase (2) and the solid phase (1) at each respective end. Between, the current is apportioned on the basis of the resistances in each phase and the charge-transfer resistances. The charge-transfer resistances can be nonlinear because they are based on kinetic expressions.
As mentioned, the reaction distribution is the main effect on the catalyst-layer scale. Because of the facile kinetics (i.e., low charge-transfer resistance) compared to the ionic resistance of proton movement for the HOR, the reaction distribution in the anode is a relatively sharp front next to the membrane. This can be seen in analyzing Figure 10, and it means that the catalyst layer should be relatively thin in order to utilize the most catalyst and increase the efficiency of the electrode. It also means that treating the anode catalyst layer as an interface is valid. On the other hand, the charge-transfer resistance for the ORR is relatively high, and thus, the reaction distribution is basically uniform across the cathode. This means... [Pg.465]

The results reviewed above suggest that gas-phase diffusion can contribute significantly to polarization as O2 concentrations as high as a few percent and are not necessarily identifiable as a separate feature in the impedance. Workers studying the P02 -dependence of the electrode kinetics are therefore urged to eliminate as much external mass-transfer resistance in their experiments as possible and verify experimentally (using variations in balance gas or total pressure) that gas-phase effects are not obscuring their results. [Pg.596]

Current and potential distributions are affected by the geometry of the system and by mass transfer, both of which have been discussed. They are also affected by the electrode kinetics, which will tend to make the current distribution uniform, if it is not so already. Finally, in solutions with a finite resistance, there is an ohmic potential drop (the iR drop) which we minimise by addition of an excess of inert electrolyte. The electrolyte also concentrates the potential difference between the electrode and the solution in the Helmholtz layer, which is important for electrode kinetic studies. Nevertheless, it is not always possible to increase the solution conductivity sufficiently, for example in corrosion studies. It is therefore useful to know how much electrolyte is necessary to be excess and how the double layer affects the electrode kinetics. Additionally, in non-steady-state techniques, the instantaneous current can be large, causing the iR term to be significant. An excellent overview of the problem may be found in Newman s monograph [87]. [Pg.386]

When the rate determining step of the electrode reaction is the charge transfer process (kinetic control), the faradic impedance ZF in Figure 1.18 can be described as RCJ, the charge transfer resistance [7,8], The impedance plot in the Nyquist plane describes a semicircle, as shown in Figure 1.19. [Pg.25]

Two impedance arcs, which correspond to two relaxation times (i.e., charge transfer plus mass transfer) often occur when the cell is operated at high current densities or overpotentials. The medium-frequency feature (kinetic arc) reflects the combination of an effective charge-transfer resistance associated with the ORR and a double-layer capacitance within the catalyst layer, and the low-fiequency arc (mass transfer arc), which mainly reflects the mass-transport limitations in the gas phase within the backing and the catalyst layer. Due to its appearance at low frequencies, it is often attributed to a hindrance by finite diffusion. However, other effects, such as constant dispersion due to inhomogeneities in the electrode surface and the adsorption, can also contribute to this second arc, complicating the analysis. Normally, the lower-frequency loop can be eliminated if the fuel cell cathode is operated on pure oxygen, as stated above [18],... [Pg.223]

Figure 6.6 proves that increasing the humidification temperature does improve fuel cell performance. Figure 6.7 also confirms that the size of the kinetic arc does decrease with increasing humidification temperature. From these results the authors concluded that it was the reduced water content at the interface that caused the increased charge-transfer resistance of the electrode with excessive PTFE content (40 wt%). [Pg.271]

Ahn et al. have developed fibre-based composite electrode structures suitable for oxygen reduction in fuel cell cathodes (containing high electrochemically active surface areas and high void volumes) [22], The impedance data obtained at -450 mV (vs. SCE), in the linear region of the polarization curves, are shown in Figure 6.22. Ohmic, kinetic, and mass transfer resistances were determined by fitting the impedance spectra with an appropriate equivalent circuit model. [Pg.287]

The results also suggest that through AC impedance measurements, the performance drops caused by individual processes such as electrode kinetic resistance, membrane resistance, and mass transfer resistance can be correlated to either reduction or improvement in cell performance. If individual impedances are known, the contribution to the change in performance can be identified, which is very important in the design and optimization of high-temperature MEA catalyst layer components, structure down-selection, and MEA architecture. [Pg.321]

The chosen electrode material should be conductive and inert within the potential range of the cell. Materials composed of allotropes of carbon and, to a lesser extent, gold are most commonly used. The cell should be designed to minimize overpotentials due to kinetics, ohmic resistance, and mass transfer of fuel in order to maximize cell voltage (A ) and current (i) generation. In addition, all cell components should be mechanically stable within their operating environment... [Pg.231]

Thus, the photoisomerization of the monolayer between the 46a-state and the protonated nitromerocyanine 46b-state provides a means to control the electrical features of the electrode surface, thereby regulating electron transfer at the electrode interface. The 46a-monolayer results in a neutral electrode surface while the 46b-monolayer gives a positively charged surface, causing the formation of an electrical double-layer at the electrode interface. Photoisomerization of the command interface resulting from the different electrochemical kinetics of the soluble redox probe can also be probed by Faradic impedance spectroscopy [90]. A small electron transfer resistance is found for the system when there is an attractive interaction between the charged redox probe and the command interface. Much larger electron transfer resistances are found upon photoisomerization to the state when repulsive interactions exist. [Pg.268]

Tertiary current distribution. This method of analysis applies to those systems where there is significant mass transport and electrode polarization effects. Electrode kinetics is considered, with electrode surface concentrations of reactant and/or products that are no longer equal to those in the bulk electrolyte due to finite mass transfer resistance. The analysis of tertiary current distributions is complex, involving the solution of coupled... [Pg.1790]

When the primary distribution does not illustrate the current or electric potential distribution well, an additional resistance, that is, the charge transfer electrode resistance, has to be considered. In such cases, we need to account for the electrode kinetics, and the secondary current and potential distributions emerge from the models. For industrial purposes the porous or tortuous electrocatalyst has to be considered as a dynamic system. This means that its porosity shape and density besides the surface roughness and the real geometric area changes all the time. This point makes us think that it... [Pg.303]


See other pages where Electrode kinetics transfer resistance is mentioned: [Pg.233]    [Pg.583]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.45]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.48 ]




SEARCH



Electrode kinetics

Electrode resistance

Kinetic resistance

Kinetic transfer

Resistance transferable

Resistive electrodes

Transfer resistance

© 2024 chempedia.info