Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Gas-phase effects

If a gas is involved in the phase transition, we can make a simple approximation. The volume of the gaseous phase is so much larger than the volume of the condensed phase (as Example 6.6 showed) that we introduce only a tiny bit of error if we simply neglect the volume of the condensed phase. We simply use in [Pg.166]

If we also assume that the gas obeys the ideal gas law, we can substitute RT/p for the molar volume of the gas  [Pg.166]

The Clausius-Clapeyron equation is very useful in considering gas-phase equilibria. For example, it helps predict equilibrium pressures at differing temperatures. Or it can predict what temperature is necessary to generate a particular pressure. Or pressure/temperature data can be used to determine the change in enthalpy for the phase transition. [Pg.166]

All liquids have characteristic vapor pressures that vary with temperature. The characteristic vapor pressure for pure water at 22.0°C is 19.827 mmHg and at 30.0°C is 31.824 mmHg. Use these data to calculate the change in enthalpy per mole for the vaporization process. [Pg.166]

When evaluating the inverse temperatures, do not truncate too early You will lose precision. [Pg.166]


Assume steady burning with the sample originally at 25 °C with a perfectly insulated bottom. At extinction you can ignore the flame radiation. Assume that all of the flakes hit the surface and ignore the gas phase effects of the extinguishment agents. Use thermodynamic properties of the C02 and H20, and the property data of PMMA from Table 9.2. [Pg.294]

The results reviewed above suggest that gas-phase diffusion can contribute significantly to polarization as O2 concentrations as high as a few percent and are not necessarily identifiable as a separate feature in the impedance. Workers studying the P02 -dependence of the electrode kinetics are therefore urged to eliminate as much external mass-transfer resistance in their experiments as possible and verify experimentally (using variations in balance gas or total pressure) that gas-phase effects are not obscuring their results. [Pg.596]

The method of Blanc [16] permits calculation of the gas-phase effective multicomponent diffusion coefficients based on binary diffusion coefficients. A conversion of binary diffusivities into effective diffusion coefficients can be also performed with the equation of Wilke [54]. The latter equation is frequently used in spite of the fact that it has been deduced only for the special case of an inert component. Furthermore, it is possible to estimate the effective diffusion coefficient of a multicomponent solution using a method of Burghardt and Krupiczka [55]. The Vignes approach [56] can be used in order to recalculate the binary diffusion coefficients at infinite dilution into the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion coefficients. An alternative method is suggested by Koijman and Taylor [57]. [Pg.279]

Manifestations or external nonideal gas-phase effects ou the appareat permeabilities and selectivities for a Kapron membrane ate given in Tables 20.4-7 and 20.4-8 for the C02-CHj system at 60°C. A CO>... [Pg.913]

These two effects are summarized in Table 20.4-8. Moreover, the percentage reduction in flux for each component dne to nonideal gas-phase effects is listed in Table 20.4-8. Ii is clear ther the redaction in fugacity driving force is very smell (0.5%) for methane, which tends to he an ideal gas under these conditions. For CO2, however, rhe effects amonnt 10 roughtly 7,5% and account for a roughly 6,9% reduction in the ides] separation factor. To reemphasize, these effects would be observed even if the polymer-phase sorption and transport behavior did not show dual-mode effects and were perfectly ideal. [Pg.914]

Solvation is a critical issue in carbohydrate modeling. Both implicit and explicit solvation strategies have been employed. While both a semiempirical quantum mechanical continuum water modeP and a free energy simulation with explicit water have predicted similar values for the free energy difference between the p- and a-anomers of 5 (AGp ), the former approach suggested that the solution free energy (—0.5 kcal/mol) was dominated by gas phase effects, whereas the latter simulation indicated that preferential solvation of the P-anomer was in part responsible for the value (-0.3 kcal/mol) of AGp > . [Pg.153]

Bush, M.F. Forbes, M.W. Jockusch, R.A. Oomens, J. Polfer, N.C. Saykally, R.J. WUhams, E.R. Infrared spectroscopy of cationized lysine and epsUon-N-methyllysine in the gas phase Effects of alkah-metal ion size and proton afhnity on zwitterion stability. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 7753-7760. [Pg.286]

The two preceding effects are due to true polymer-phase sorption and transport phenomena. At veiy high pressures, an additional complexity related to nonideal gas-phase effects may arise and cause potentially incorrect conclusions about the transport phenomena involved. This confusion can be avoided by defining an alternative permeability P" in terms of the fiigacity difference rather than the partial pressure difference driving diffusion across the membrane. The benefit of using this thermodynamic permeability is illustrated for the CO2-CH4 system at elevated pressures. [Pg.904]

Comparison of the differences between pure and mixed compment cases for the penmealnlities of each component calculated in the standard fashion and in the thennodynamically normalized Esshkm (P ) is revealing. The difference between the pure and mixed gas cases for the P columns of each conqxment corresponds to the apparent total depression in flux resulting fnmi both true dual-mode competition effects and nonideal gas-phase effects. The differences between the pure and mixed gas cases for die P cohimns are free of complications arising from nonideal gas-phase efli. Therefore, the differences b ween these columns are manifestations of the rather small competition efliect due to dual-mode sorption under these conditions. [Pg.914]

TABLE 20.4-7 Magnitude of the Nonideal Gas-Phase Effects for Both Pure and Mixed Gas Situations with Kapton at 60 C for the CO2-CH4 System... [Pg.914]

Fortunately, these phenomena can be predicted readily by using standard thermodynamic equations of state to calculate the fiigacity of each component in the upstream and downstream gas phases. For plasticization-prone polymers such as cellulose acetate, the depression of COj fiigacity in high CH, pressure situations may suppress large upswings in permeability noticed for pure COj (as in Fig. 20.3-9). The area of nonideal gas-phase effects clearly requires considerably more careful investigation. [Pg.916]

An appropriate internal standard for MALDI must compensate not only for any crystallization irregularities but also for subsequent desorption and gas-phase effects. In choosing an internal standard, the relative polarities of the analytes and internal standard as well as their solvent solubilities should be considered (Sleno and Volmer, 2006). Structural similarities should reflect the gas-phase behavior of the involved molecules and extend to solubility. Naturally, an isotope-labeled standard is the ideal choice since its chemical behavior is nearly identical to its unlabeled counterpart (Gusev et al., 1996). Such a standard guarantees identical crystallization and gas-phase behavior of the analyte and internal standard (Kang et al., 2001). [Pg.464]

The RHR plots for PP-MAPP-Cloisite 20A nanocomposite and PP at 35 kW/m heat flux shown in Figure indicate a 60% - decrease of peak of RHR (Fig. 11). Comparison of the Cone calorimeter data PP and PP-MAPP- 7% Cloisite 20A reveals that the specific heat of combustion (He), specific extinction area (SEA), a measure of smoke yield, and carbon monoxide yields are practically unchanged this suggests that the source of the improved flammability properties of these materials is due to differences in condensed-phase decomposition processes and not to a gas-phase effect. The primary parameter responsible for the lower RHR of the nanocomposites is the mass loss rate (MLR) during combustion, which is significantly reduced from the value observed for the pure PP (Fig. 12). It is supposed, that this effect is caused by ability to initiate the formation of char barrier on a surface of burning polymeric nanocomposites that drastically limits the heat and mass transfer in a burning zone. [Pg.56]

Evaporation of Droplets Leading to Coulomb Fissions Producing Progeny Droplets that Ultimately Lead to Ions in the Gas-Phase Effects of the Concurrent Large Concentration Increase... [Pg.11]


See other pages where Gas-phase effects is mentioned: [Pg.595]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.596]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.1097]    [Pg.1097]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.913]    [Pg.914]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.784]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.913]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.1012]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.887]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.192 , Pg.195 ]




SEARCH



Addition reactions, gas-phase radical directive effects

Chemical Effects in the Gas Phase

Directive effects in gas-phase radical addition reactions

Directive effects, in gas-phase radical

Effects of Gas Phase Kinetics

Gas phase structural effects

Phase effects

Pressure Effects in Gas-Phase Reactions

Solvent Effects on Acidity and Basicity from Gas Phase Ion Equilibria Measurements

Stability Maps Pressure, Gas-phase Chemistry and Fuel Transport Properties Effects

Structural Effects in the Gas Phase

Substituent Effects in the Gas Phase

© 2024 chempedia.info