Electrode configuration electrolytes

Three concentrations of each redox couple that ranged over two orders of magnitude were examined as well as a solution containing only electrolyte. The details of these comprehensive experiments will be published elsewhere (22.) however, several pertinent features are described here. The kinetic currents were measured at constant potential. In order to eliminate mass transfer limitations to the current, a jet electrode configuration was utilized (42). The capacitance of the space charge layer (Csc) was measured at the same potentials simultaneously with the kinetic currents. 

Although the literature on electrodeposited electroactive and passivating polymers is vast, surprisingly few studies exist on the solid-state electrical properties of such films, with a focus on systems derived from phenolic monomers, - and apparently none exist on the use of such films as solid polymer electrolytes. To characterize the nature of ultrathin electrodeposited polymers as dielectrics and electrolytes, solid-state electrical measurements are made by electrodeposition of pofy(phenylene oxide) and related polymers onto planar ITO or Au substrates and then using a two-electrode configuration with a soft ohmic contact as the top electrode (see Figure 27). Both dc and ac measurements are taken to determine the electrical and ionic conductivities and the breakdown voltage of the film. 

However, high electrolyte conductivity on its own does not necessarily guarantee low polarization in a solid state cell. Electrode/electrolyte inter-facial resistance must also be taken into account, and in contrast to the more familiar situation with conventional aqueous systems where the solid electrodes are uniformly wetted by the liquid electrolyte, the all-solid configuration of the cell may create non-uniform contact at the interfaces. Differential expansion and contraction of electrodes and electrolyte may lead to poor contact (and consequent high internal resistance due to low effective electrode/electrolyte interfacial area) or even to a complete open circuit during cell operation. The situation is even more serious with secondary cells, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 9.4, where the effects... 

Most detailed studies of water photodissociation on SrTi03 and Ti02 have concentrated on photoelectrochemical cells (PEC cells) operating under conditions of optimum efficiency, that is with an external potential applied between the photoanode and counterelectrode. We have become interested in understanding and improving reaction kinetics under conditions of zero applied potential. Operation at zero applied potential permits simpler electrode configurations (11) and is essential to the development of photochemistry at the gas-semiconductor interface. Reactions at the gas-sold, rather than liquid-solid, interface might permit the use of materials which photocorrode in aqueous electrolyte. 

This column is also used to give the identity of the auxiliary or counter electrode when a three-electrode configuration was used, and to indicate whether the indicator or working electrode was subjected to chemical, mechanical, or electrolytic pretreatment. 

In order to evaluate the electrode configuration, similar experiments were performed as described in the previous section, and the results were compared in order to determine whether the electrodes behave identically in the absence and presence of cotton. As expected, similar results were obtained concerning the relationships Equation 10.1 is also valid for electrodes immersed in cotton that act as an immobilising substance for the electrolyte, but the value of k is different. Indeed, all experimentally obtained curves are shifted towards higher resistive behaviour, which can be explained by the fact that the presence of cotton forms a barrier for the conductivity of ions through the electrolyte solution. However, as explained in the previous section, k can be obtained by calibrating the electrode setup, so calibration in the presence of cotton circumvents the problem of different results in the absence and presence of cotton. 

Finally, the electrode configuration was tested with artificial sweat instead of sodium chloride-containing electrolyte solutions. No shifts of relationships or different results were found between the experiments performed with artificial sweat and those with sodium chloride solutions (section 10.4). From these results, the following conclusions can be drawn ... 

This technology has been extended to measurements in electrolyte solutions by independently controlling the potential of the substrate and the tip with respect to a reference electrode located in the solution. This electrochemical STM allows the progress of electrochemical reactions to be monitored in situ under potential control. The instrument uses a four-electrode configuration in which the potentials are controlled so that the current flowing between the substrate and tip is dominated by the tunneling current, while a predominantly Faradaic current flows between the substrate and the counter electrodes. 

Conventional reference electrodes consist of a solid reversible electrode and an aqueous electrolyte solution. To measure the individual contributions from the anode and the cathode of a PEM fuel cell, the electrolyte solution of the reference electrode must either be in direct contact with one side of the solid proton exchange membrane or be located in a separate compartment with electrical contact between the reference electrode and the solid membrane by means of a salt bridge [66], As a result, two different types of reference electrode configurations are employed for the study of fuel cells internal and external. 

The external type of reference electrode is connected to the membrane via a liquid electrolyte bridge, such as a sulphuric acid solution, as shown in Figure 5.45. Compared with the internal reference electrode configuration, the external type is easier to use in a normal PEM fuel cell set-up because it needs minimal modifications. However, attention must also be paid to ensure that the liquid electrolyte has good contact with the membrane and does not flow into the cell. Furthermore, the use of a liquid electrolyte in an acid bridge can induce non-uniform hydration and a proton concentration gradient in the membrane, therefore interfering with the fuel cell electrodes. 

Fig. 39. Electrode configuration for the measurement of the conductivity in a thin layer of electrolyte in contact with the electrode surface.

If the tunnel junction of Fig. 1 a is simply immersed in an electrolyte, the polarization between the tip and the sample will promote an electrolysis. A bi-potentiostat is necessary to ensure real tunneling between the sample and the tip. Such a device, classically used in electrochemistry, enables to split the tunnel junction into two sol-id/liquid interfaces, independently polarized against a reference of potential (Fig. 1 b). Using this configuration, also referred to as the four-electrode configuration and introduced very early by several groups, it is possible to avoid any electrochemical transfer between the sample and the tip [25,26]. The reference potential is an electrode whose potential is well defined and constant with respect to the vacuum level. The sample is biased against the reference electrode to monitor reactions at the surface, just as in a classical electrochemical cell. The tip potential is adjusted... 

---