Distillation columns bottom level control

Recognize the response pattern of an integrating process variable, such as distillation column bottom level or reflux drum level, when a step change in setpoint is introduced to the controller with a proportional gain of 1.25 and an integral time constant of 30 min... 

The magnitudes of various flowrates also come into consideration. For example, temperature (or bottoms product purity) in a distillation column is typically controlled by manipulating steam flow to the reboiler (column boilup) and base level is controlled with bottoms product flowrate. However, in columns with a large boilup ratio and small bottoms flowrate, these loops should be reversed because boilup has a larger effect on base level than bottoms flow (Richardson rule). However, inverse response problems in some columns may occur when base level is controlled by heat input. High reflux ratios at the top of a column require similar analysis in selecting reflux or distillate to control overhead product purity. 

Distillation columns with temperature controllers on both overhead and bottom Process lines with two control valves in series (e.g., flow/level or flow/flow)... 

Distillate and bottoms were controlled by accumulator and sump levels, respectively, feed and reflux on flow control and boilup was temperature-controUed Tower pall rings were replaced by higher-capadfy rings (bottom) uid wire-mesh structured packing (top) to increase c )acity and reduce reflux. The column was sensitive to ambient disturbances (e.g., rainstorms). The reflux reductions escalated this sensitivity to an extent that annulled the revamp benefits. The temperature control was ineffective due to its narrow range of variation. Problems were solved by controlling boilup on sump level and bottom product on flow control. 

A less common variation of the distillate scheme is used on the occasion where the first column in a distillation train is for removing light components, and the bottoms flow rate needs to be very steady as the flow rate to a large diameter fractionator as the second tower. In this case, the bottoms flow rate is set manually for the controller that manipulates the bottoms valve. The column-base level controller in the first-column manipulates the feed rate to the first column. 

In the reflux scheme, a column temperature controller manipulates a control valve in the reflux line. The reflux drum level controller manipulates a valve in the distillate line. The column base level controller manipulates a valve in the bottoms line. The feed and reboiler steam are each on flow rate control. In some cases, there is a controller for the pressure drop across the trays that manipulates the valve in the reboiler steam line. However, it is preferred to use a steam flow rate controller and simply monitor the tower pressure drop. With this scheme the separation power base is derived from the ratio of steam/feed. The distillate/feed material balance split is maintained by the MRT point controller. 

The manipulated bottoms flow rate scheme is not used very frequently because of problems with the column base level control using steam. When a thermosiphon reboller Is used and the steam flow Is Increased, there Is usually a reversal in the column base level response. The column level first rises and then falls. The usual case for using this scheme is when the feed concentration is 95% light key or more. In other words, most of the feed is distilled overhead from a few percent heavies or tars. The MRT point is usually in the reboiler. 

One important loop pairing from past experience (see Chien et al. ) is that the organic phase level should be controlled by the entrainer makeup flow, not by an internal recycling flow of OR, so that the snowbaUing effect can be avoided. For the combined preconcentrator/recovery column, the reflux dmm level is controlled by the distillate flow (feed to the heterogeneous azeotropic column) the column bottom level is controlled by the bottom water product flow and the column pressure is controlled by the condenser duty. 

Consider Figure 19.2 where top-product flow is set by flow control, reflux flow is set by condensate receiver level control, boilup is fixed by flow control of steam or other heating medium, and bottom-product flow is determined by column-base level control. As shown by the dotted line, we wish eventually to control column top composition by manipulating distillate flow. Let us assume that feed rate, feed composition, feed enthalpy, and boilup are fixed and that we wish to find the changes (i.e., gains ) of top and bottom compositions in response to a change in D, the top-product rate. 

The feed flow is often not controlled but is rather on level control from another column or vessel. The liquid product flow s (distillate and bottoms) are often on level rather than flow control. Top vapor product is, however, usually on pressure control. The reflu.x is frequently on FRC, but also may be on column TRC or accumulator level. 

Some radioactive bromine (half-life 36 hours), in the form of ammonium bromide, was put into a brine stream as a radioactive tracer. At another plant 30 km away, the brine stream was electrolyzed to produce chlorine. Radioactive bromine entered the chlorine stream and subsequently concentrated in the base of a distillation column, which removed heavy ends. This column was fitted with a radioactive-level controller. The radioactive bromine affected the level controller, which registered a low level and closed the bottom valve on the column. The column became flooded. There was no injury, but production was interrupted. 

The best designs provide for the percentage vaporization per pass to have been completed by the time the fluid mixture reaches the upper end of the tube and the mixture is leaving to enter the bottom chamber of the distillation column. In order to assist in accomplishing this, the initial reboiler elevation should be set to have the top tubesheet at the same level as the liquid in the column bottom section. A liquid-level control adjustment capability to raise or lower this bottoms level must exist to optimize the recirculation. Sometimes, the level in the bottom of the column may need to be 25-30% of the reboiler tube length above the elevation of the tubesheet. Therefore, the vapor nozzle return from the reboiler must enter at sufficient elevation to allow for this possibility. 

Example 1.5. For a binary distillation column (see Fig. 1.6), load disturbance variables might include feed flow rate and feed composition. Reflux, steam, cooling water, distillate, and bottoms flow rates might be the manipulated variables. Controlled variables might be distillate product composition, bottoms product composition, column pressure, base liquid level, and reflux drum liquid level. The uncontrolled variables would include the compositions and temperatures on aU the trays. Note that one physical stream may be considered to contain many variables ... 

As a final example, suppose we are controlling the base level in a distillation column with the bottoms product flow rate. The valve would be AO because we want it to fail shut (we don t want to lose base level in an emergency). The level transmitter signal increases if the level increases. If the level goes up, we want the bottoms flow rate to increase. Therefore the base level controller should be increase-increase (direct acting). 

Tray 4 temperature on the Lehigh distillation column i controlled by a pneumatic Pf controller with a 2-mipute reset time and a 50 percent proportional band. Temperature controller output (COr) adjusts the Ktpoint of a steam flow controller (reset time 0.1 min and proportional band 100 percent). Column base level is controlled by a pneumatic proportional-only controller setting bottoms product withdrawal rate. 

Care must be taken not to specify more control objectives than the available remaining degrees of freedom. If this is done then the system becomes over specified and there is no solution to the system, i.e. the system cannot be controlled. For example, it is impossible to design a control system for the distillation column illustrated in Fig. 7.10 which will control not only Xc S, Pc and the two levels—but also (say) the overhead product flowrate D and the bottoms product flowrate W. 

Once the large internal flow rates have been set via appropriate control laws, the index of the DAE system (7.21) is well defined, and a state-space realization (ODE representation) of the slow subsystem can be derived. This representation of the slow dynamics of the column can be used for the derivation of a model-based nonlinear controller to govern the input-output behavior of the column, namely to address the control of the product purity and of the overall material balance. To this end, the small distillate and bottoms flow rates as well as the setpoints of the level controllers are available as manipulated inputs. 

If the reactants A and B are lighter and heavier, respectively, than the product P, the flowsheet involves two distillation columns and two recycle streams (Figure 4.5). The control structure includes loops for reactor level and temperature, as well as for distillation columns top and bottom purity. The following dimensionless equations can be derived ... 

Separation constraints The separation in a column can be expressed as the impurity levels of the key components in the two products xg.LK in the bottoms and xD Hx in the distillate. Separation is limited by the minimum reflux ratio and the minimum number of trays. We must always have more trays than the minimum and a higher reflux ratio than the minimum. If the number of trays in the column is not large enough for the desired separation, no amount of reflux will be able to attain it and no control system will work. In extractive distillation columns, there is also a maximum reflux ratio limitation, above which the overhead stream becomes less pure as the reflux increases. 

R-V Reflux flow controls distillate composition. Heat input controls bottoms composition. By default, the inventory controls use distillate flowrate to hold reflux drum level and bottoms flowrate to control base level. This control structure (in its single-end control version) is probably the most widely used. The liquid and vapor flowrates in the column are what really affect product compositions, so direct manipulation of these variables makes sense. One of the strengths of this system is that it usually handles feed composition changes quite well. It also permits the two products to be sent to downstream processes on proportional-only level control so that plantwide flow smoothing can be achieved. 

Figure 6.96 shows a column that is separating a mixture with a low relative volatility, so the column has a large number of trays and operates with a high reflux ratio. This type of column is called a superfractionator. Because of the high reflux ratio, reflux should be used to control reflux drum level. For the same reason, vapor boilup should be used to control base level. Therefore the two manipulators left to control composition are distillate and bottoms flowrates. Obviously these two... 

Seven liquid levels are in the process separator and two (base and overhead receiver) in each column. The most direct way to control separator level is with the liquid flow to the stabilizer column. Then stabilizer column overhead receiver level is controlled with cooling water flow and base level is controlled with bottoms flow. In the product column, distillate flow controls overhead receiver level and bottoms flow controls base level. 

Four alternative control schemes are commonly used for distillation column control, as shown in Figure 3.15 through Figure 3.18, respectively. Scheme 1 directly adjusts the material balance by manipulation of the distillate flow. If the distillate flow is increased, then the reflux accumulator level controller decreases the reflux flow. As less liquid proceeds to flow down to the sump, the sump level controller decreases the bottoms flow a like amount. The separation is held constant by manually setting the reboiler steam flow to maintain a constant energy per unit feed. 

Note that the column may have additional controllers such as condenser and reboiler level controls. The levels, however, are not independent variables since they must be maintained within dehned bounds. The liquid levels, which have no effect on the separation, may be controlled by manipulating the distillate and bottoms product rates. 

In the multiloop controller strategy each manipulated variable controls one variable in a feedback proportional integral derivative (PID) control loop. Taking a single-feed, two-product distillation column with a total condenser and a reboiler as an example, a basic list of possible controlled variables includes the distillate and bottoms compositions, the liquid levels in the reflux accumulator and the column bottom, and the column pressure. The main manipulated variables are the reflux, distillate, and bottoms flow rates and the condenser and reboiler heat duties. 

Eollowing are two examples (16.1 and 16.2) of a distillation column that demonstrate the effect of applying different pairing strategies. In both examples the control loops for the column pressure and the liquid levels in the condenser accumulator and the column bottom are determined independently based on practical considerations. Thus, the column pressure is controlled by various techniques that may involve the condenser coolant rate, and the liquid levels are controlled by the product flow rates. What remains to be decided is how to pair the distillate and bottoms compositions with the reflux rate and the reboiler heat duty. The same distillation column is used in both examples, having a total condenser and a reboiler, one feed and two products. The column is designed to separate a benzene-toluene mixture into benzene and toluene products with specified purities. 

A pilot-scale distillation column located at the University of Sydney, Australia is used as the case study [60]. The 12-tray distillation column separates a 36% mixture of ethanol and water. The following process variables are monitored temperatures at trays 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, and the reflux stream, bottom and top levels (condenser), and the flow rates of bottoms, feed, steam, distillate and reflux streams. The column is operated at atmospheric pressure using feedback control. Three variables are controlled during the operation top product temperature, condenser level, and bottom level. Temperature at tray 8 is considered as the inferential variable for top product composition. To maintain a desired product composition, PI controllers cascaded on flow were used to manipulate the reflux, top product and bottom product streams. 

---