Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Disappearance of pesticides

During the fermentative process, yeasts can cause the disappearance of pesticide residues by degradation or absorption at the end of the fermentation when yeasts are deposited as lees. [Pg.54]

Moreover, beyond the development of analytical methodologies for the determination of pesticides in VOO, the research is focused on the characterization and detection of degradation and metabolism of pesticides in VOO. The chemical degradation and metabolism are major mechanisms of disappearance of pesticides after application to olive trees or olive grove soil. Studying pesticide metabolites in VOO could allow the characterization of a pesticide s metabolic pathway, providing fundamental information on the residues found in VOO. [Pg.232]

FIGURE 4.3 Loss of pesticides from soil, (a) Breakdown of herbicides in soil, (b) Disappearance of persistent organochlorine insecticides from soils (from Walker et al. 2000). [Pg.82]

Danube, Ukrania 417,800 total 61,000 agriculture (rice more important) The cultures were a source of fertilizers and pesticides that have accumulated in the food chain causing physiological changes in animals and plants, as well as the disappearance of some species [37, 38]... [Pg.267]

Three general classes of hydrolytic reactions in aqueous solutions have been characterized. In neutral, or pH independent hydrolysis, the rate of disappearance of a pesticide, P, is given by... [Pg.222]

Recently reported results for the hydrolysis kinetics of chlorpyrifos (7 ) suggest that equation 2 may not be a valid representation of alkaline hydrolysis kinetics for at least one class of pesticides (organophosphorothioates). In short, kg may be pH dependent. However, disappearance kinetics for such molecules are still adequately described at fixed pH by pseudo first-order kinetics. [Pg.223]

Bayesian methods are very amenable to applying diverse types of information. An example provided during the workshop involved Monte Carlo predictions of pesticide disappearance from a water body based on laboratory-derived rate constants. Field data for a particular time after application was used to adjust or update the priors of the Monte Carlo simulation results for that day. The field data and laboratory data were included in the analysis to produce a posterior estimate of predicted concentrations through time. Bayesian methods also allow subjective weight of evidence and objective evidence to be combined in producing an informed statement of risk. [Pg.171]

Either photocatalysis or ozonation alone achieved rapid disappearance of aromatic pesticide. In contrast, mineralization (TOC removal) was slow for both. However, photocatalytic mineralization was enhanced considerably by ozone pretreatment (Fig. 9.16).31) This effect may be explained by ozonolytic cleavage of the aromatic ring and subsequent formation of aliphatic compounds which are more degradable by photocatalysis. Simultaneous use of photocatalyst and ozonation (illuminated by 254 nm light) showed synergetic effect on TOC removal (Fig. 9.17).32) In this process scavenging of electrons by ozone is considered to play the most important role. [Pg.271]

Table 6.4 shows first-order rate coefficients and tx/2 values for degradation of a number of pesticides in soils (Rao and Davidson, 1982). The k and t1/2 values calculated from field data are based on the disappearance of the parent compound (solvent extractable). Table 6.4 also includes k and t1/2 values calculated on mineralization (14C02 evolution) and parent-compound disappearance from laboratory studies. The t1/2 values were smaller for field than for laboratory studies. Rao and Davidson (1980) attribute this to the multitude of factors that can affect pesticide disappearance in the field while only one factor is studied in the laboratory. Rao and Davidson (1982) suggested that pesticides be classified into three groups based on values (Table 6.5) nonpersistent (t1/2 < 20 days), moderately persistent (20 < t1/2 < 100 days), and persistent (/1/2 > 100 days). Most chlorinated hydrocarbons are grouped as persistent, while carboxyl-kanoic acid herbicides are nonpersistent. The s-triazines, substituted ureas, and carbamate pesticides are moderately persistent. [Pg.140]

Their volatilization from litter on the forest floor will also be appreciable. With the possible exception of carbaryl, their volatilization after being washed into the soil will be relatively low or insignificant because of their low volatility, low Henry s constants, Kh> and/or their high rates of degradation in the soil environment. The rapid disappearance of the phenoxy herbicides (2, 31) and the insecticide, fenitrothion (28) from vegetation and the forest floor is supporting evidence that volatilization is an important pathway for loss of applied pesticides from the forest canopy and litter on the forest floor. [Pg.208]

These values represent dietary levels that cause minimal or no effects on animals ingesting them every day for long periods of time. Substantially higher concentrations of pesticides in the diet may show effects which are not considered harmful on test animals. They are changes which can be detected while the animal is on the pesticide rations. These are apparently adaptive changes, since they disappear when the animals are taken off the pesticide rations. [Pg.29]

Pesticide accumulation in soil is determined by the difference between the rate at which the pesticide is added and the rate at which it disappears. The rate of addition is determined by the application schedule and is discontinuous, while the rate of disappearance is continuous and is controlled by the concentration of pesticide residue plus other factors. It is as if we had a reservoir into which fluid were being dumped by the bucket and out of which it escaped steadily through a small pipe, with the rate of flow determined by the height of fluid in the reservoir plus other factors. [Pg.130]

If other factors are, for the moment, considered constant, the rate of disappearance will depend upon some continuous function of the concentration of residue in the soil. When this rate is integrated with regular periodic additions of pesticide, the result is a sawtooth pattern like that shown in Figure 1. If there is a concentration of residue at which the loss in between applications becomes exactly equal to the addition rate, the maximum residue will approach a limiting value which is the number 2 in Figure 1. It is possible, of course, that this condition cannot be achieved, and in such a case, the residue will increase without limit. [Pg.131]

The first-order rate law is but one of many possibilities, and an interesting comparison can be made between several of the simpler rate laws using a pseudo half life. Consider the case where two measurements of pesticide residue in soil are made 1 year apart and assume, further, that one half of the added pesticide has disappeared during that year—that is, the pesticide shows a half life of 1 year for this specific concentration. In Figure 2, the path of disappearance of one concentration unit is plotted on semilog paper according to a pseudo half life of 1 year and four possible rate laws first-order, second-order, one-half-order, and zero-order—that is, whether the rate of decomposition is proportional to the concentration, the square of the concentration, the square root of the concentration, or independent of the concentration. [Pg.134]

Vm = maximum rate of pesticide disappearance C = concentration of reactant at time t C0 = concentration of reactant at t 0 Km = an equilibrium constant... [Pg.136]

The complex nature of soil and soil processes means that many factors besides the type of reaction kinetics can aifect the course of the disappearance of a pesticide. An example would be a case of a volatile pesticide for which a significant part of the loss was caused by vaporization from the soil. A complete mathematical analysis would take into account chemical degradation, vaporization, and diffusion. It would yield a mathematical relation different from and more complicated than one expressing the chemical kinetics alone. An example is simultaneous diffusion and degradation of soil fumigants as described by Hemwall (3,4). [Pg.139]

Ebeling (4) states that the disappearance of most pesticide residues appears to depend on first-order reaction kinetics, but unfortunately residue data cannot be extrapolated from one environment or dosage range to another. Involved are the nature of the compound, absorption and metabolism by microorganisms, adsorption to mineral and organic colloids, absorption by higher organisms, chemical and photochemical alterations, the temperature, and dispersal by air and water movement (5,6). [Pg.280]

Soil temperature influences chemical degradation, microbial decomposition, and volatilization. For example, no aldrin or heptachlor was lost from frozen soils, but at 6°C, 16-27% of the dose applied to soil was lost in 56 days at 26°C, 51-55% disappeared and at 46°C, 86-98% was lost. Diazinon was also degraded faster at higher temperatures than at low ones (Edwards, 1973b). Temperature also influences the adsorption of pesticide in soils because adsorption is a exothermic process, so that increased temperatures decrease adsorption and release pesticides. [Pg.235]

Part of the problem was that the side effects were constantly ramifying. A first-order effect—say, the decline or disappearance of a local insect population—led to changes in flowering plants, which changed the habitat for other plants and for rodents, and so on. Another part of the problem was that the effects of pesticides on other species were examined only under experimental conditions. Yet the application of DDT was under field conditions, and as Carson pointed out, scientists had no idea what the interactive effects of pesticides were when they were mixed with water and soil and acted upon by sunlight. [Pg.292]

Studies of disappearance of technical chemical products in nature e.., plastic, paint, pesticides, drugs (total fate studies accumulation, e.g.y at the end of food chains)... [Pg.4]

The pesticide DDT is toxic to humans and animals repeatedly exposed to it. DDT persists in the environment for a long time. It concentrates in fatty tissues. The DDT once used to control the screwworm fly was replaced by a radiological technique. Irradiating the male flies with gamma rays alters their reproductive cells, sterilizing them. When great numbers of sterilized males are released in an infested area, they mate with females, who, of course, produce no offspring. This results in the reduction and eventual disappearance of the population. [Pg.1020]

A similar calculation for lindane, using the figure in Table 8.3 (9.4 x 10 mmHg), gives a saturation vapor density of 150 ng/1, which indicates that lindane disappears by evaporation much more easily than DDT. It is important to note that the vapor density, and thus evaporation velocity, will be reduced by adsorption in the soil, but will be enhanced by higher moisture content in the soil due to co-distillation. A parameter called Henry s constant (H) is important to determine the volatilization of pesticides when dissolved in water. According to Henry s law there will be equilibrium of concentrations in water and air at a specified temperature ... [Pg.179]


See other pages where Disappearance of pesticides is mentioned: [Pg.249]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.5127]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.120 ]




SEARCH



Disappearance

Disappearance, pesticides

© 2024 chempedia.info