Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Modeling different scales

The space filling model developed by Corey, Pauling, and Koltun is also known as the CPK model, or scale model [197], It shows the relative volume (size) of different elements or of different parts of a molecule (Figure 2-123d). The model is based on spheres that represent the "electron cloud . These atomic spheres can be determined from the van der Waals radii (see Section 2.10.1), which indicate the most stable distance between two atoms (non-bonded nuclei). Since the spheres are all drawn to the same scale, the relative size of the overlapping electron clouds of the atoms becomes evident. The connectivities between atoms, the bonds, are not visualized because they are located beneath the atom spheres and are not visible in a non-transparent display (see Section 2.10). In contrast to other models, the CPK model makes it possible to visualize a first impression of the extent of a molecule. [Pg.133]

Decades of work have led to a profusion of LEERs for a variety of reactions, for both equilibrium constants and reaction rates. LEERs were also established for other observations such as spectral data. Furthermore, various different scales of substituent constants have been proposed to model these different chemical systems. Attempts were then made to come up with a few fundamental substituent constants, such as those for the inductive, resonance, steric, or field effects. These fundamental constants have then to be combined linearly to different extents to model the various real-world systems. However, for each chemical system investigated, it had to be established which effects are operative and with which weighting factors the frmdamental constants would have to be combined. Much of this work has been summarized in two books and has also been outlined in a more recent review [9-11]. [Pg.182]

As the flow of a reacting fluid through a reactor is a very complex process, idealized chemical engineering models are useful in simplifying the interaction of the flow pattern with the chemical reaction. These interactions take place on different scales, ranging from the macroscopic scale (macromixing) to the microscopic scale (micromixing). [Pg.49]

The model is able to predict the influence of mixing on particle properties and kinetic rates on different scales for a continuously operated reactor and a semibatch reactor with different types of impellers and under a wide range of operational conditions. From laboratory-scale experiments, the precipitation kinetics for nucleation, growth, agglomeration and disruption have to be determined (Zauner and Jones, 2000a). The fluid dynamic parameters, i.e. the local specific energy dissipation around the feed point, can be obtained either from CFD or from FDA measurements. In the compartmental SFM, the population balance is solved and the particle properties of the final product are predicted. As the model contains only physical and no phenomenological parameters, it can be used for scale-up. [Pg.228]

Equation (23) predicts a dependence of xR on M2. Experimentally, it was found that the relaxation time for flexible polymer chains in dilute solutions obeys a different scaling law, i.e. t M3/2. The Rouse model does not consider excluded volume effects or polymer-solvent interactions, it assumes a Gaussian behavior for the chain conformation even when distorted by the flow. Its domain of validity is therefore limited to modest deformations under 0-conditions. The weakest point, however, was neglecting hydrodynamic interaction which will now be discussed. [Pg.91]

In Fig. 4 we compare the timings for three different models, the simple one K per processor, the wrapped algorithm, and a model where two states are assigned per processor sequentially. Note that until J = 50 the one K per processor model job uses the smallest amount of wall clock time. It is clear, however, that this method does not make efficient use of computer resources. The wrapped model, however, scales very well and outperforms the sequential two K per processor model at every / > 0, a clear illustration of the degradation of performance due to load imbalance. [Pg.27]

Multiscale modeling of process operations. The description of process variables at different scales of abstraction implies that one could create models at several scales of time in such a way that these models communicate with each other and thus are inherently consistent with each other. The development of multiscale models is extremely important and constitutes the pivotal issue that must be resolved before the long-sought integration of operational tasks (e.g., planning, scheduling, control) can be placed on a firm foundation. [Pg.267]

USEtox . In order to determine the environmental risk characterization for DeBDEs and Pb in China, USEtox requires that different scales are defined. Since China is such a big country, the whole country has been considered as a continent. Therefore, the continental landscape data are defined by parameters describing this target country. Moreover, due to the nature of the model, two... [Pg.355]

USEtox . Environmental concentrations can be obtained for the theoretical case of 1 kg emitted into the urban air (default USEtox ) or considering the emissions obtained with the developed scenarios (Chap. 1) [51]. It is important to highlight that these concentration values are calculated by the model considering processes such as advection, transportation, and degradation among the different scales implemented by USEtox . [Pg.360]

A technique which can assist in the scale-up of commercial plants designs is the use of scale models. A scale model is an experimental model which is smaller than the hot commercial bed but which has identical hydrodynamic behavior. Usually the scale model is fluidized with air at ambient conditions and requires particles of a different size and density than those used in the commercial bed. The scale model relies on the theory of similitude, sometimes through use of Buckingham s pi theorem, to design a model which gives identical hydrodynamic behavior to the commercial bed. Such a method is used in the wind tunnel testing of small model aircraft or in the towing tank studies of naval vessels. [Pg.26]

Table 1 gives the values of design and operating parameters of a scale model fluidized with air at ambient conditions which simulates the dynamics of an atmospheric fluidized bed combustor operating at 850°C. Fortunately, the linear dimensions of the model are much smaller, roughly one quarter those of the combustor. The particle density in the model must be much higher than the particle density in the combustor to maintain a constant value of the gas-to-solid density ratio. Note that the superficial velocity of the model differs from that of the combustor along with the spatial and temporal variables. [Pg.59]

Mehdizadeh et al. exploited the separability of current distribution on different scales to model the macroscopic current distribution on patterns made up of lines or points distributed over a large workpeice [136], They solved the secondary distribution of the superficial current density sup using a boundary condition which captures the density of small features but not their geometry. The boundary condition is based on a smoothly varying parameter representing the Faradaically active fraction of surface area. [Pg.182]

Unfortunately, the dynamic correlation energy is not constant for a given molecule but may vary considerably between different electronic states. Thus, any procedure geared towards quantitative accuracy in predicting excited-state energies must in some way account for these variations. The most economical way to achieve this is to introduce a number of parameters into the model. By scaling those to a set of experimental data... [Pg.241]

The models discussed so far describe ideal chains and do not account for interactions between monomers which typically consist of some short-ranged repulsion and long-ranged attraction. Including these interactions will give a different scaling behavior for long polymer chains. The end-to-end radius,... [Pg.154]

We recall that our wave equation represents a long wave approximation to the behavior of a structured media (atomic lattice, periodically layered composite, bar of finite thickness), and does not contain information about the processes at small scales which are effectively homogenized out. When the model at the microlevel is nonlinear, one expects essential interaction between different scales which in turn complicates any universal homogenization procedure. In this case, the macro model is often formulated on the basis of some phenomenological constitutive hypotheses nonlinear elasticity with nonconvex energy is a theory of this type. [Pg.185]

Resultant energy curves in H2 and H2. u, Burrau s curve for H2 . b, Curve for H2 for non-interacting electrons, c, Approximate curve for H2 with interacting electrons. The small circle in the crook of curve b, represents the equilibrium position and energy on Hutchisson s classical crossed-orbit model of H2. Units same as figure 1 (note different scales of ordinates for Ha and H2+). [Pg.4]

FIGURE 16.32 Average percentage of hydrocarbon in exhaust emissions by model year and grouped into five groups from lowest emissions (front) to highest (back) in four cities. Note the different scales (adapted from Zhang et al., 1995). [Pg.902]

Many other solvent parameters have been defined in an attempt to model as thoroughly as possible solvent effects on the rate constants for solvolysis. These include (a) Several scales of solvent ionizing power Tx developed for different substrates R—X that are thought to undergo limiting stepwise solvolysis. (b) Several different scales of solvent nucleophilicity developed for substrates of different charge type that undergo concerted bimolecular substitution by solvent. (c) An... [Pg.62]

Known scale-up correlations thus may allow scale-up even when laboratory or pilot plant experience is minimal. The fundamental approach to process scaling involves mathematical modeling of the manufacturing process and experimental validation of the model at different scale-up ratios. In a paper on fluid dynamics in bubble column reactors, Lubbert and coworkers (54) noted ... [Pg.112]

In the case of low resistance in fluid film or/and unfavorable equilibrium (equilibrium-limited system), a high contact time at the large bed would be beneficial for the equilibration step, whereas a high superficial velocity is not expected to lead to better results, since the fluid-film resistance is minimal. Furthermore, the same type of model can be used for different scales. [Pg.534]


See other pages where Modeling different scales is mentioned: [Pg.386]    [Pg.1037]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.198]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.61 ]




SEARCH



Different models

Model, scale

Modeling scale

© 2024 chempedia.info