Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Detection limit heavy metals

While detection of cations via porphyrin-ba.sed materials has been explored less than anion sensing, the ability of a porphyrin to coordinate different metals and the unique spectral signatures that result form the basis for metal ion detection. Use of free-base porphyrins in polymer matrices has allowed for the detection of heavy metal ions by Ache et Immobilization of 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-N-methylpyridyOporphyrin on Nafion membranes pennitted detection of cadmium and mercury in solution with detection limits of 5 X 10 M and 2 x 10 M, respectively over a 20-minute measuring period. The method is subject to interferences from other metal ions, but the researchers were able to detect several ions simultaneously using pattern-recognition techniques such as principal component analysis. Sol-gel films doped with 5,l0,l5,20-tetra(p-sulfonatophenyDporphyrin have also been used by Ache and coworkers for the fluorimetric determination of mercury in solution, with a detection limit of approximately 7 X 10... [Pg.123]

Multielement analysis, excellent detection limits for heavy metals quantitative measurement of heavy-metal trace contamination on silicon wafers... [Pg.27]

The term direct TXRF refers to surface impurity analysis with no surface preparation, as described above, achieving detection Umits of 10 °—10 cm for heavy-metal atoms on the silicon surface. The increasit complexity of integrated circuits fabricated from silicon wafers will demand even greater surfrce purity in the future, with accordingly better detection limits in analytical techniques. Detection limits of less than 10 cm can be achieved, for example, for Fe, using a preconcentration technique known as Vapor Phase Decomposition (VPD). [Pg.352]

Anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV) has been used extensively for the determination of heavy metals in samples of biological origin, such as lead in blood. ASV has the lowest detection limit of the commonly used electroanalytical techniques. Analyte concentrations as low as 10 M have been determined. Figure 16 illustrates ASV for the determination of Pb at a mercury electrode. The technique consists of two steps. The potential of the electrode is first held at a negative value for several minutes to concentrate some of the Pb " from the solution into the mercury electrode as Pb. The electrode process is... [Pg.39]

Fang et al. [661] have described a flow injection system with online ion exchange preconcentration on dual columns for the determination of trace amounts of heavy metal at pg/1 and sub-pg/1 levels by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (Fig. 5.17). The degree of preconcentration ranges from a factor of 50 to 105 for different elements, at a sampling frequency of 60 samples per hour. The detection limits for copper, zinc, lead, and cadmium are 0.07, 0.03, 0.5, and 0.05 pg/1, respectively. Relative standard deviations are 1.2-3.2% at pg/1 levels. The behaviour of the various chelating exchangers used was studied with respect to their preconcentration characteristics, with special emphasis on interferences encountered in the analysis of seawater. [Pg.238]

Nygaard [752] has evaluated the application of the Spectraspan DC plasma emission spectrometer as an analysis tool for the determination of trace heavy metals in seawater. Sodium, calcium, and magnesium in seawater are shown to increase both the background and elemental line emission intensities. Optimum analytical emission lines and detection limits for seven elements are reported in Table 5.8. [Pg.265]

Prange et al. [809,810] carried out multielement determinations of the stated dissolved heavy metals in Baltic seawater by total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) spectrometry. The metals were separated by chelation adsorption of the metal complexes on lipophilised silica-gel carrier and subsequent elution of the chelates by a chloroform/methanol mixture. Trace element loss or contamination could be controlled because of the relatively simple sample preparation. Aliquots of the eluate were then dispersed in highly polished quartz sample carriers and evaporated to thin films for spectrometric measurements. Recoveries (see Table 5.10), detection limits, and reproducibilities of the method for several metals were satisfactory. [Pg.279]

Atomic absorption spectrometry is one of the most widely used techniques for the determination of metals at trace levels in solution. Its popularity as compared with that of flame emission is due to its relative freedom from interferences by inter-element effects and its relative insensitivity to variations in flame temperature. Only for the routine determination of alkali and alkaline earth metals, is flame photometry usually preferred. Over sixty elements can be determined in almost any matrix by atomic absorption. Examples include heavy metals in body fluids, polluted waters, foodstuffs, soft drinks and beer, the analysis of metallurgical and geochemical samples and the determination of many metals in soils, crude oils, petroleum products and plastics. Detection limits generally lie in the range 100-0.1 ppb (Table 8.4) but these can be improved by chemical pre-concentration procedures involving solvent extraction or ion exchange. [Pg.333]

The ratios of relative concentration can not be calculated because the heavy metal contents of rice or vegetables growing in an acidic rain area or in a non-acidic rain area is lower than the method detection limit (MDL) of heavy metals. [Pg.358]

Implementation Samples of the river water, sediments, and even some of the dead fish are taken to the contract lab where their chemists use GC-MS, after appropriate sample preparation, to determine that there are no toxic compounds at significant levels i.e., high enough to harm the fish. Your own results for heavy metals are also negative—nothing above safe limits was detected. [Pg.832]

Contamination of silicon wafers by heavy metals is a major cause of low yields in the manufacture of electronic devices. Concentrations in the order of 1011 cm-3 [Ha2] are sufficient to affect the device performance, because impurity atoms constitute recombination centers for minority carriers and thereby reduce their lifetime [Scl7]. In addition, precipitates caused by contaminants may affect gate oxide quality. Note that a contamination of 1011 cnT3 corresponds to a pinhead of iron (1 mm3) dissolved in a swimming pool of silicon (850 m3). Such minute contamination levels are far below the detection limit of the standard analytical techniques used in chemistry. The best way to detect such traces of contaminants is to measure the induced change in electronic properties itself, such as the oxide defect density or the minority carrier lifetime, respectively diffusion length. [Pg.211]

According to the technology developer, geochemical fixation can treat dissolved hexavalent chromium and other metals in groundwater at concentrations ranging from the detection limit to several hundred parts per milhon. The developer asserts that geochemical attenuation can treat most of the common heavy metals, trace elements, and namral radionuclides that occur in groundwater, such as metal-cyanide complexes, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, selenium, uranium, and radium. [Pg.1030]

Accuracy. In the quantitative method that is used to measure the heavy metal quantity in the drug substance, the accuracy is usually represented by the recovery rate obtained from a spiked recovery test where lead is added to the samples. Since the heavy metals limit test specified in monograph specifications is a test where the intensity of coloring of the samples with sodium sulfide is compared with that of the control solution, it is necessary to confirm that heavy metal components can be detected fully in the process of test solution preparation. The Heavy Metals Limit Test in JP specifies four preparation methods for the test solutions. An appropriate method will be selected and used for further testing. The test method that gives the best recovery rate is to be adopted. The procedure is as follows ... [Pg.97]


See other pages where Detection limit heavy metals is mentioned: [Pg.364]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.1713]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.405]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.1759]    [Pg.227]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.101 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.101 ]




SEARCH



Detectable limit

Detection limits

Detection limits, limitations

Detection-limiting

Heavy detection

Heavy-metal detection

Metal detection

© 2024 chempedia.info