Dental materials mechanical properties

Dentistry. Most casting alloys meet the composition and properties criteria of specification no. 5 of the American Dental Association (37) which prescribes four types of alloy systems constituted of gold—silver—copper with addition of platinum, palladium, and 2inc. Composition ranges are specified, as are mechanical properties and minimum fusion temperatures. Wrought alloys for plates also may include the same constituents. Similarly, specification no. 7 prescribes nickel and two types of alloys for dental wires with the same alloy constituents (see Dental materials). 

The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) F4 Committee on Medical Materials and Devices has developed specifications for chemical composition, mechanical properties, and other factors. Standard test methods also are available from ASTM, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia. The quaHty of castings is important for dental implants, and standards to define this would be useful. 

Water sorption of dental materials can result In undesirable changes In dimensions and to a deterioration In mechanical properties. Studies have been made of BIS-GMA copoljnners of the kind mentioned above (49.50 ) and also of polymers of potential use... 

Polymers used as dental materials must meet several stringent requirements. Dental restorative materials must be nontoxic, have aesthetic appearance, and good adhesive and mechanical properties. In addition, these materials must exhibit long term stability in the presence of water, enzymes, and various oral fluids, and withstand thermal and load cycles. Finally, a desirable dental restorative materia] should be convenient to work with at the time of application. 

Thus, to improve upon the physical and mechanical properties of the polymer material, one must not only consider the materials used, but also the conditions under which the polymer was formed. These reaction conditions, along with the type of monomer system chosen, will completely control the conversion of functional groups in the system. More importantly, the conversion will ultimately determine the mechanical, physical, and wear properties of the material. Since most dental materials are crosslinked polymers, characterizing the polymerization reaction becomes even more important since the physical nature of a crosslinked polymer is fixed upon completion of the polymerization. For example, not only is the microstructure (i.e. the degree of crosslinking) largely unalterable after polymerization, but the system is insoluble and fixed macroscopically. Clearly, to produce crosslinked networks with the desired material properties, one must ascertain the appropriate reaction conditions and the effects of the reaction conditions on the network structure. 

A number of mechanical properties have been studied that may affect the clinical success of dental composite restorative materials. Among these are diametral tensile strength (DTS), flexural strength, fracture toughness, elastic modulus, hardness, and fatigue resistance. The mechanical properties should approximate those of tooth structure [183], but correlation of clinical success to any of these properties is limited. 

Traditional materials utilized for orthopedic and dental applications have been selected based on their mechanical properties and ability to remain inert in vivo this selection process has provided materials that satifisfy physiological loading conditions but do not... 

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Select Orthopedic and Dental Materials and Bone... 

Traditional materials for orthopedic and dental applications have been selected based on their mechanical properties and ability to remain inert in vivo this selection process has provided materials that satisfied physiological loading conditions but did not duplicate the mechanical, chemical, and architectural properties of bone. Most importantly, to date, failure of conventional orthopedic and dental implant materials is often due to insufficient bonding to juxtaposed bone (that is, insufficient osseointegration). 

In spite of these investigations, many reports in the literature demonstrate that these nanoapatite ceramics are not always osteoinductive and, furthermore, do not possess mechanical properties similar enough to bone for sustained osseointegration (Muller-Mai el al., 1995 Doremus, 1992 Du et al., 1999 Weng et al., 1997), criteria necessary for increased orthopedic and dental implant efficacy. Moreover, mechanisms of osteoinduction of calcium phosphate ceramics are not clear and seem to depend on specific nanoapatite material properties (such as surface properties and crystallinity) and the animal tested (i.e., dog versus rabbit). Undoubtedly, the incidental cases of calcium phosphate biomaterial-induced osteogenesis indicate promise in... 

Orthopedic and dental implant materials bioceramics, 145-146 chemical modifications, 147-148 comparing mechanical properties of, and bone, 146 conventional, 127 costs, 126-127 current materials, 145-148 fate of implanted device, 140-141 integration into surrounding tissue, 127 integrin expression on osteoblasts, 144 integrins, 143-144 metals, ceramics, and polymers, 145 next generation, 127,148-159... 

From a materials perspective there are two possible reasons why dental enamel shows the large variations in mechanical properties shown in figure 1 firstly, chemical variations in apatite composition and, secondly, changes in enamel structure with position from the occlusal surface to the EDJ. The chemical composition of enamel can be examined with a lateral resolution of 1-10 pm with electron microprobe analysis. Enamel structure can be obtained with SEM. To perform an accurate microprobe analysis, natural and synthetic minerals are used as standards to calibrate the instrument. This is fairly routine for geologists and earth scientists who are able to obtain chemical compositions with an accuracy of <0.1% for a wide range of elements simultaneously (including Na, Mg, Al, Si, P, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Y, Zr, Ba, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy, Er, Yb, Hf, Ta, Pb, Th, U, F and Cl). In enamel only a few of these (Na, Mg, Al, P, K, Ca, Ti, Cl and F) are above the detection limit. The Ti is likely to be an impurity or contaminant rather than a constituent of enamel. This technique does not work for lighter elements such as C, S, O and N which may be present in enamel. 

Next-generation metallic biomaterials include porous titanium alloys and porous CoCrMo with elastic moduli that more closely mimic that of human bone nickel-titanium alloys with shape-memory properties for dental braces and medical staples rare earth magnets such as the NdFeB family for dental fixatives and titanium alloys or stainless steel coated with hydroxyapatite for improved bioactivity for bone replacement. The corrosion resistance, biocompatibility, and mechanical properties of many of these materials still must be optimized for example, the toxicity and carcinogenic nature of nickel released from NiTi alloys is a concern. ... 

J. Loof et al., Mechanical properties of a permanent dental restorative material based on calcium aluminate. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. Med. 14(12), 1033-1037 (2003). 

---