Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Current noise, calculations

Luckily, most current SRV sizing programs include a noise calculation. However, it is perhaps interesting to know in detail some methods used in the industry. Standard methods are available for calculation of valve noise heard at a certain distance. [Pg.209]

We realize that, as for the DM noise calculation, from the viewpoint of the noise envelope and its required attenuation, only the fundamental harmonic really counts. The current caused by this is... [Pg.434]

The frequency distribution of the current noise was of the l// -type and was independent of temperature that is to say, it was the same inside and outside the Tg or Tm region, respectively. This constancy is illustrated in Figure 4 for the Tg region of PS. The spectrum for thermal noise was white in all the measurements carried out. The sample resistance values calculated from the observed noise spectra agreed with the resistance values obtained with the conventional resistance bridge irrespective of the temperature or time scale of the experiment. [Pg.11]

Additionally, there is the inherent amplifier noise. It consists of two frequency-dependent components, the internal voltage noise source e and the voltage drop across the source resistance R, caused by an internal current noise generator i . The total input noise for the amplifier with a bandwidth of B=f2 -fi is calculated as the sum of its three independent components ... [Pg.138]

Several parameters can be derived and calculated from the electrochemical noise data obtained, which may be used to determine the severity of general corrosion and the types of corrosion. However, the theoretical explanation of some of the parameters is stiU under debate. The only generally accepted parameter is the electrochemical noise resistance, R, which is defined as the ratio of the standard deviations of potential noise and current noise R = avloi). This parameter is thought to be equivalent to the polarization resistance Rp, which can be used to estimate general corrosion rate. [Pg.790]

The other parameters include the pitting index, which is defined as the standard deviation of current noise divided by the mean current (PI = ci//mean) the power spectral density of a noise, which can be calculated using the MEM (maximum entropy method) and the FFT (fast Fourier... [Pg.790]

The presented results are valid for a mercury cadmium telluride n v detector optimized for 10.6 pm. Figure 3.19 shows the calculated dependence of theoretical g-r noise current on detector bias current. Calculation parameters are shown in the figure. For low bias currents noise practically does not increase with the current, but this is the region where the exclusion effects are practically useless. A strong increase appears for higher bias values, while at still higher bias currents theoretical noise reaches saturation. [Pg.170]

The current noise is removed by calculating the transfer functions (the amplitude ratio between the two in the frequency domain) between the horizontal channels and the vertical channel in the absence of earthquakes and then subtracting the horizontal channels times this transfer function from the vertical channel. Next, the transfer function between the pressure channel and the vertical channel is calculated, and the pressure data times this transfer function is subtracted from the vertical channel. If Gaa(/) is the power spectral density (mean squared fast Fourier transform (FFT) over several windows) of the channel we want to remove noise from, Gss(f) is the power spectral density of the channel containing the noise source, and Cas(/) is the coherency between them, then the transfer function is defined as... [Pg.1747]

How big can a vacuum gap be for tunnel current to be detected This depends upon the bandwidth required aud the iuput capacitauce of the device recording the current. For example, if this input capacitauce was 1 pF (a small value, quite hard to achieve) and the required baudwidth. A/ was 5 kHz, theu the curreut-to-voltage couverter equivaleut resistauce could uot be larger thau 3 x 10" Q (calculated from aRC= 1 at the -3 dB point of 5 kHz). The associated Johnson noise, calculated from... [Pg.184]

To verify the modelling of the data eolleetion process, calculations of SAT 4, in the entrance window of the XRII was compared to measurements of RNR p oj in stored data as function of tube potential. The images object was a steel cylinder 5-mm) with a glass rod 1-mm) as defect. X-ray spectra were filtered with 0.6-mm copper. Tube current and exposure time were varied so that the signal beside the object. So, was kept constant for all tube potentials. Figure 8 shows measured and simulated SNR oproj, where both point out 100 kV as the tube potential that gives a maximum. Due to overestimation of the noise in calculations the maximum in the simulated values are normalised to the maximum in the measured values. Once the model was verified it was used to calculate optimal choice of filter materials and tube potentials, see figure 9. [Pg.212]

So, a comparison of different types of magnetic field sensors is possible by using the impulse response function. High amplitude and small width of this bell-formed function represent a high local resolution and a high signal-to-noise-characteristic of a sensor system. On the other hand the impulse response can be used for calculation of an unknown output. In a next step it will be shown a solution of an inverse eddy-current testing problem. [Pg.372]

Noise levels between 85 and 120 dB(A) affect the hearing of exposed workers on a dose-related basis. The Leq of the noise is calculated and compared to the criterion currently employed. Under Section 2 of the Health and Safety at... [Pg.656]

Diffusion of electroactive species to the surface of conventional disk (macro-) electrodes is mainly planar. When the electrode diameter is decreased the edge effects of hemi-spherical diffusion become significant. In 1964 Lingane derived the corrective term bearing in mind the edge effects for the Cotrell equation [129, 130], confirmed later on analytically and by numerical calculation [131,132], In the case of ultramicroelectrodes this term becomes dominant, which makes steady-state current proportional to the electrode radius [133-135], Since capacitive and other diffusion-unrelated currents are proportional to the square of electrode radius, the signal-to-noise ratio is increased as the electrode radius is decreased. [Pg.446]

The LOQ can be determined by a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 1, or approximated by mnltiplying the LOD by 3.3. As with LOD, this fnnction is easily obtained from current data-acquisition software. Similarly, LOQ can be estimated by the equation LOQ = 10(SD/S) and by hand calculation as well. LOQ should be reported as a concentration and the precision and accuracy of this value should also be reported. As for LOD, measurement of the actual LOQ value may not be necessary if the method is shown to perform at a level that is sufficiently low (e.g., 0.1%). Figure 4 shows an example of an estimate of LOQ for an HPLC sample chromatogram. [Pg.205]

In this paper the PLS method was introduced as a new tool in calculating statistical receptor models. It was compared with the two most popular methods currently applied to aerosol data Chemical Mass Balance Model and Target Transformation Factor Analysis. The characteristics of the PLS solution were discussed and its advantages over the other methods were pointed out. PLS is especially useful, when both the predictor and response variables are measured with noise and there is high correlation in both blocks. It has been proved in several other chemical applications, that its performance is equal to or better than multiple, stepwise, principal component and ridge regression. Our goal was to create a basis for its environmental chemical application. [Pg.295]

One sees that the ion flow caused by a gas is proportional to the partial pressure. The linear equation system can be solved only for the special instance where m = g (square matrix) it is over-identified for m> g. Due to unavoidable measurement error (noise, etc.) there is no set of overall ion flow Ig (partial pressures or concentrations) which satisfies the equation system exactly. Among all the conceivable solutions it is now necessary to identify set 1 which after inverse calculation to the partial ion flows 1, will exhibit the smallest squared deviation from the partial ion currents i actually measured. Thus ... [Pg.108]

When extending the pump-probe scheme into the x-ray domain, we deal with two very different pump and probe light sources with respect to their pulse intensities. This poses stringent boundary conditions on the sample design in order to guarantee a feasible experiment [11]. To start with, we estimate the signal-to-noise ratio that one can anticipate with current technology. Hereby, we restrict the calculations to pump-probe experiments in... [Pg.353]

Summary. The semiclassical Boltzmann-Langevin method is extended to calculations of higher cumulants of current. Rs efficiency is demonstrated for mesoscopic diffusive contacts and chaotic cavities. We show that in addition to a dispersion at the inverse RC time characteristic of charge relaxation, higher cumulants of noise have a low-frequency dispersion at the inverse dwell time of electrons in the system. [Pg.257]

FWHM Full width at half-maximum. Mass resolution is often difficult to determine at or near the base of a peak due to baseline noise and peak overlap. It is more common to measure the width of the peak halfway to the peak maximum, where a clean measurement is possible. The most common alternative to FWHM was the 10% valley definition, in which the peak width at 10% of height was examined. This latter definition is common in the literature, especially for magnetic sector mass spectrometers, but is currently used much less frequently than FWHM. The choice of FWHM or 10% valley has an impact on the calculation of resolving power. [Pg.15]


See other pages where Current noise, calculations is mentioned: [Pg.422]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.689]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.97]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.379 ]




SEARCH



Current noise

Noise Calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info