Noise current

Figure 13. (a) Experimental approach for simultaneous collection of potential and current noise, (b) Schematic for remotely controlled impedance and noise multichannel data collection system. (Reprinted from F. Mansfield, C. Chen, C. C. Lee, and H. Xiao, The Effect of Asymmetric Electrodes on the Analysis of Electrochemical Impedance and Noise Data, Corros. Sci. 38 (3) 497, Fig. 1. Copyright 1996 with permission of Elsevier Science.)...

The main problem has been a methodological one. The patch clamp analysis of single channels views the world of channels through a very small analytical window [10]. A single channel event (opening) needs to be sufficiently long-lived and sufficiently large to be picked up within the current noise band under optimized conditions, and with the low-pass filter set to say 2 kHz. The open time needs to be close to a millisecond and the current amplitude close to 0.5 pA to permit detection. 

The square wave produced by the double-beam in space spectrometer is preferred since there is only one detector and the signal is a square-wave that is essentially an alternating current. Alternating currents are much easier to manipulate electronically. In particular they can be easily amplified and noise that is either direct current noise or high-frequency noise can be filtered from the signal. 

Simultaneous monitoring of the selfgenerated electrochemical potential and current noise using analogue and digital techniques has been evaluated as a tool for monitoring coating performance. These data obtained have been compared with those from a.c. in jedance techniques. 

Laboratory measurement procedures used for electrochemical data acquisition and analysis during the monitoring exercise are outlined, and particular emphasis is placed on the electrochemical noise techniques. Electrochemical current noise has been monitored between two identical electrodes and the potential noise between the working electrodes and a reference electrode. 

Recent work [6 has been directed towards the simultaneous monitoring of potential and current noise, where the current noise signal is generated by coupling two nominally Identical electrodes with a zero resistance ammeter (ZRA), and the potential noise of the couple is monitored with respect to a reference electrode. In this manner no externally applied signal is required. 

The potential noise signal provides information pertaining to the type of attack, whereas the current noise provides data which indicate the rate of corrosion and the type of attack. When used in parallel, the two noise measurements may be used to estimate the polarisation resistance of the interface being examined. 

When applied to coated metals, the fluctuations observed in the current noise signal are generally low in magnitude with the baseline of detection essentially being limited by the sensitivity of the electronic interface. For the studies cited, the lower limit of the current noise signal is some 10 pico-amps. 

The input multiplexer was designed to allow multi-channel capability and was configured to monitor both potential and current noise fluctuations sequentially on a maximum of eight pairs of samples. 

The current noise signal was monitored by using a sensitive, low noise zero resistance ammeter (ZRA) to couple pairs of identical electrodes the ZRA acting as a current to voltage converter. This derived potential signal was then fed into a potential noise monitor. 

The derived value of polarisation resistance was evaluated from the ratio of the standard deviation of the potential noise signal to the standard deviation of the current noise signal, i.e. ... 

Figure 8. Analogue potential and current noise traces for bitumen on mild steel. Day 1.

The peak-to-peak noise value is approximately 8 times the rms value. For example, at room temperature, over a frequency interval of 3 kHz, on a 100 MlQ resistor, the Johnson current noise is... 

The larger the feedback resistor, the smaller the current noise. By using a 1 Mfi feedback resistor, the theoretical noise becomes 2 pA, a tangible value when very small tunneling current is measured. 

Figure 18-6 Errors in spectrophotomefric measurements due to dark current noise and cell positioning imprecision in a research-quality instrument. [Data from L D. Rothman. S. R. Crouch, and J. D. Ingle. Jr.."theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Factors Affecting Precision in Molecular Absorption Spectrophotometry." Anal. Chem. 1975,47, 1226.]...

Energy Dependence of Current Noise in Superconducting/Normal Metal Junctions... 

In the Andreev interferometers (see Fig. 1), the phase relations between the electron and hole wavefunctions in the normal wire can be controlled by the magnetic flux enclosed by a superconducting loop, which results in the periodic dependence of transport characteristics of the interferometer on the superconducting phase difference across the SNS junction. Initially, the oscillations of the conductance were investigated both experimentally (see a review in Ref. [11]) and theoretically [12], and, more recently, the oscillations in the current noise were reported [10]. 

If the distribution function of electrons in the cavity f(e,t) were not allowed to fluctuate, the contacts would be independent generators of current noise whose zero-frequency energy-resolved cumulants ((/ R))e could be obtained from a quantum-mechanical formula... 

We present the theoretical overview first for the case of voltage bias [1]. In a junction with a low transparency barrier (which corresponds to our samples) biased by a dc voltage V, the current noise spectral density (related to the... 

By measuring the differential conductance as a function of Vg and Vs,i we have shown that the increase of shot noise occurs exactly in the region of Vg-Vsd where two interacting impurities carry the current in a correlated way, region 2 in Fig. 3a. In Fig. 3a at small Vsd a cross-like feature is clearly seen near point R2 - the exact positions of the maxima of the conductance peaks of this line are indicated by circles. With increasing Vsd, however, a new parallel line Rl appears at Vg ps —1.694 V and Vsj 1 mV. This happens when the line R2 enters the central area of cross M - the maxima of the conductance peaks of the new line are shown by triangles. In Fig. 3b current noise and the Fano factor are presented as functions of Vsa for different Vg. One can see that the modulation of the current occurs in region (2) of the central area of cross M, between lines Rl and R2. 

There are a variety of FPA detectors available that are sensitive in the NIR spectral region. The optimal choice of detectors depends on several factors desired wavelength range, whether the application will be laboratory based or part of a process environment, the sensitivity needed to adequately differentiate sample spectra and price. The figure of merit most often used to describe detector performance is specific detectivity or D, which is the inverse of noise equivalent power (NEP), normalized for detector area and unit bandwidth. NEP is defined as the radiant power that produces a signal-to-dark-current noise ratio of unity. 

---