Water Critical concentration

There also appears to exist a critical water concentration within the adhesive below which water-induced damage of the joint will not occur. This also infers that there is a critical humidity for deterioration. For an epoxy system, it is estimated that the critical water concentration is about 1.35 to 1.45 percent and that the critical humidity is 50 to 65 percent.39,40 Any loss in joint strength by the absorbed water can be restored upon drying if the equilibrium moisture uptake is below the critical water concentration. 

For ecological receptors, a similar approach may be employed for secondary receptors that could be influenced by a change in the soil environment. For instance, it is possible to model the potential for soil to influence an adjacent surface water body and therefore to screen the soil criteria for impacts on an aquatic receptor. When applied, this leads to intercompartment harmonization of standards, by which soil or sediment standards pose no problems for water bodies and vice versa. In addition, it may be possible to use screening-level models to assess the potential for a bioaccumulable substance to influence a tertiary ecological receptor, usually a top predator or a protected species. In this approach, the reference dose can be borrowed from other sources (e.g., use of an aquatic criterion to determine a critical water concentration). The model is then used only to assess how the soil may influence transfer to the critical receptor. However, it should be noted that this type of procedure cannot be used for guideline development related to primary terrestrial receptors since there are no reliable models to estimate dose-response relationships for these receptors. Therefore, other techniques described in this chapter are recommended for screening against primary receptors. 

Khurgin et al. (1977) measured the chymotrypsin-catalyzed breakdown of the amide substrate A -succinyl-L-phenylalanine-/>-nitroaniline at low hydration levels. For this substrate the acylation process is rate limiting. Figure 28 shows the extent of reaction for 1 1 enzyme-substrate mixtures, of nominal pH 7.5, reacted for 5—7 days. The intent of the experiments was to define the critical water concentration at which activity could first be detected. This was determined as the intercept of the linear region of the response with the abscissa. For chymotrypsin with no added buffer, the critical hydration level was at relative humidity 0.48, which corresponds to 0.12 A (Luescher-Mattli and Ruegg, 1982a). The reaction grows explosively (Fig. 28) above this hydration level. Addition of 0.57 g of sodium acetate per g of chymotrypsin reduced the critical hydration level by about half. This may reflect the hydration of the the salt, rather than a specific effect on the enzyme. 

If we take a basis of one square foot of surface area, there will be an area of these full capillaries which can be designated as some length squared (L ). Capillaries in the other two directions are being emptied down to r at the same time as those at the surface. The total volume of water is thus reduced to L. Let L — 1 when the total surface is available for mass transfer of water and we are at the critical water concentration (TTc). Let W be the water content at any time. Thus... 

The assumption was then made that the amount of water in the outer debonded zone of the joint exceeded the critical water concentration, while in the central zone, still unaffected by environmental exposure, it was below the critical level. The extent of interfacial debonding that occurred on environmental exposure can be considered equivalent to the environmental crack length, a, needed to relate the stress intensity factor, Xj, to the fracture stress, ay, of the joint (Eq. 5). 

A current issue which has not been adequately explained is that there is a critical water concentration (or critical relative humidity (r.h.)), below which structural adhesive joints in metals are not weakened above it they are progressively weakened. 

Further evidence for a critical water concentration comes from Ohno et al. [36] for joints of mild steel bonded to PMMA with an acrylic dental adhesive, immersed in water at 37°C. Water entered the bonds by diffusion through the plastic adherend, and the steel surface inside the joints could be visually examined through the PMMA and adhesive. After immersion, the joints were subjected to 20 thermal cycles between liquid nitrogen (-196°C) and water at 40°C, which showed that the interface was broken by water when its concentration reached 48% of the equilibrium concentration in PMMA. No changes were visible on the steel surface at the 48% water level, but at 95%, small white spots appeared and the surface then gradually turned black due to corrosion. 

The self-diffusion coefficients of W, bmim, and BF were obtained by and F PGSTE-NMR experiments. For all components, the self-diffusion coefficients increase upon water loading. The dependence of and on the water content is of particular interest. At low water content, anions and cations share the same self-diffusion coefficient, but above a critical water concentration, the anion begins to diffuse faster than the cation. Such a threshold composition can be easily determined with the help of Figure 1.1 where the dependence of the difference on the water loading is shown. Clearly, only above X =0.2 such a difference deviates significantly from zero. 

A steep increase in conductivity at intermediate water concentrations can be explained by percolation transition, and every ME mixture will exhibit a specific critical water volume ratio/concentration at which percolation occurs. The increased conductivity leading up to the is caused by an increased number of (still) individual water droplets. The conductivity measured around and above the (j) is due to dynamic droplet clusters or transient water channels, and microscopically droplets do not exist anymore at this stage. The critical water concentration needed to induce percolation usually ranges from 0.1 to 0.26 depending on the ME components, specifically the type of cosurfactant, and the temperature. 

Ohki and Aono, 1970). Since loss of water would decrease the local dielectric constant, the net-charge effect on micellar transition could occur, and the arrangement suggested by X-ray data (Finean et al., 1968) would obtain quickly (see Fig. 8) at a critical water concentration. 

---