Cracking processes fluid

Catalytic Processes. A second group of refining operations which contribute to gas production are the catalytic cracking processes, such as fluid-bed catalytic cracking, and other variants, in which heavy gas oils are converted into gas, naphthas, fuel oil, and coke (5). 

IFP Process for 1-Butene from Ethylene. 1-Butene is widely used as a comonomer in the production of polyethylene, accounting for over 107,000 t in 1992 and 40% of the total comonomer used. About 60% of the 1-butene produced comes from steam cracking and fluid catalytic cracker effluents (10). This 1-butene is typically produced from by-product raffinate from methyl tert-huty ether production. The recovery of 1-butene from these streams is typically expensive and requires the use of large plants to be economical. Institut Francais du Petrole (IFP) has developed and patented the Alphabutol process which produces 1-butene by selectively dimerizing ethylene. 

The most dominant catalytic process in the United States is the fluid catalytic cracking process. In this process, partially vaporized medium-cut petroleum fractions called gas oils are brought in contact with a hot, moving, freshly regenerated catalyst stream for a short period of time at process conditions noted above. Spent catalyst moves continuously into a regenerator where deposited coke on the catalyst is burnt off. The hot, freshly regenerated catalyst moves back to the reactor to contact the hot gas oil (see Catalysts, regeneration). 

The Houdry fixed-bed cyclic units were soon displaced in the 1940s by the superior Fluid Catalytic Cracking process pioneered by Warren K. Lewis of MIT and Eger Murphree and his team of engineers at Standard Oil of Newjersey (now Exxon). Murphree and his team demonstrated that hundreds of tons of fine catalyst could be continuously moved like a fluid between the cracking reactor and a separate vessel for... 

An improved design undertaken by Sacony used high-velocity gases to replace the mechanical elevator systems as catalyst carriers. These so-called air-lift units improved upon the Thermofor process both in terms of economies and octane numbers. It was, however, only with the fluid cracking process that catalytic technology realized fully continuous production. 

Fluid catalytic cracking rapidly overtook its competitors as both a source of fuel and of critical organic intermediates. Prior to 1942, the Houdry Process controlled 90 percent of the catalytic fuel market. But only three years later, in 1945, fluid cracking led all other catalytic cracking processes in market share (40 percent). At this time Thermofor technology stood at 31 percent, and Houdry at less chan 30 percent. 

Since 1945, the fluid catalytic cracking process has rapidly overtaken fuel production and has become the central technology in the U.S. petrochemicals industi y. With fluid cracking, the scale of petrochemical operations grew eiinriiiotisly. For the first time, refiners could process virtually any volume of oil rapidly and efficiently. 

There are two major commercial thermal cracking processes, delayed coking and fluid coking. Flexicoking is a fluid coking process in which the coke is gasified with air and steam. The resulting gas mixture partially provides process heat. 

In the fluid coking process, part of the coke produced is used to provide the process heat. Cracking reactions occur inside the heater and the fluidized-bed reactor. The fluid coke is partially formed in the heater. Hot coke slurry from the heater is recycled to the fluid reactor to provide the heat required for the cracking reactions. Fluid coke is formed by spraying the hot feed on the already-formed coke particles. Reactor temperature is about 520°C, and the conversion into coke is immediate, with... 

Analysis of feed and products from a fluid catalytic cracking process ... 

However, in the case of stress-corrosion cracking of mild steel in some solutions, the potential band within which cracking occurs can be very narrow and an accurately known reference potential is required. A reference half cell of the calomel or mercury/mercurous sulphate type is therefore used with a liquid/liquid junction to separate the half-cell support electrolyte from the process fluid. The connections from the plant equipment and reference electrode are made to an impedance converter which ensures that only tiny currents flow in the circuit, thus causing the minimum polarisation of the reference electrode. The signal is then amplifled and displayed on a digital voltmeter or recorder. 

FTC [Fluid-bed thermal cracking] A continuous thermal cracking process for making synthesis gas from heavier petroleum fractions. 

MSCC [Millisecond catalytic cracking] A fluid catalytic cracking process which uses an ultra-short contact time reaction system. It is claimed that less capital investment and higher liquid yields can be achieved using this process, compared with conventional FCC units. Developed by Bar-Co and now offered by UOP it has been operating since 1994. 

The first cracking catalysts were acid-leached montmorillonite clays. The acid leach was to remove various metal impurities, principally iron, copper, and nickel, that could exert adverse effects on the cracking performance of a catalyst. The catalysts were first used in fixed- and moving-bed reactor systems in the form of shaped pellets. Later, with the development of the fluid catalytic cracking process, clay catalysts were made in the form of a ground, sized powder. Clay catalysts are relatively inexpensive and have been used extensively for many years. 

Prior to 1938, gasoline was obtained from thermal-cracking plants then the Houdry fixed-bed catalytic cracking process led to the development of a fluidized-bed process by Standard Oil for the catalytic production of motor fuels (4-8). Acid-treated clays of the montmorilIonite type were the first fluid-cracking catalysts widely employed by the industry. However, the ever greater demand for aviation fuels during the 1939-1945 period prompted the search for more active and selective catalysts. Research on novel catalyst... 

A number of mechanistic modeling studies to explain the fluid catalytic cracking process and to predict the yields of valuable products of the FCC unit have been performed in the past. Weekman and Nace (1970) presented a reaction network model based on the assumption that the catalytic cracking kinetics are second order with respect to the feed concentration and on a three-lump scheme. The first lump corresponds to the entire charge stock above the gasoline boiling range, the second... 

Al-Enezi, G., Fawzi, N., and Elkamel, A. (1999) Development of regression models to control product yields and properties of the fluid catalytic cracking process. Petroleum Science e[ Technology, 17, 535. 

Lee, L.S., Chen, T.W., Haunh, T.N., and Pan, W.Y. (1989) Four lump kinetic model for fluid catalytic cracking process. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 67, 615. 

---