Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fertilizer costs

Hydroxylamine (hyam) is used in the production of caprolactam, a key raw material for the manufacture of Nylon-6. Several technologies exist for the production of caprolactam with a key difference being the amount of byproduct ammonium sulfate, a low cost fertilizer, formed. The hyam used in the process is produced by... [Pg.93]

To determine the feasibiUty of, or need for, fertilization requires knowing (/) which of the required elements, if any, are deficient in the soil (2) what chemical forms of the deficient elements are assimilable by the plants and thus suitable as fertilizers (5) what quantity of fertilizer material is required to meet the needs of the crop and (4) whether the crop yield increase resulting from fertilizer appHcation would warrant the cost of the fertilizer production and appHcation. [Pg.213]

As is evident from the listing in Table 3, the fertilizer manufacturer has a wide array of compounds from which to choose. Final choices of products and processes therefore rest heavily on such other factors as availabiUty and cost of raw materials, economy of processing, safety of product, economy of handling and shipping, acceptabiUty of physical form and physical behavior of the product, and farmer acceptance. [Pg.214]

The sustained world popularity of NSP results from simplicity of production and high agronomic quaHty as a carrier of available P2O5, calcium, sulfur, and usually some incidental micronutrients. In terms of agronomic value for large numbers of crops, no phosphate fertilizer has been shown to be superior to NSP. It is likely to remain in strong demand in parts of the world where simplicity of production or sulfur fertilization has high priority and where transportation costs are not prohibitive. [Pg.223]

Potassium Chloride. The principal ore encountered in the U.S. and Canadian mines is sylvinite [12174-64-0] a mechanical mixture of KCl and NaCl. Three beneficiation methods used for producing fertilizer grades of KCl ate thermal dissolution, heavy media separation, and flotation (qv). The choice of method depends on factors such as grade and type of ore, local energy sources, amount of clay present, and local fuel and water availabiUty and costs. [Pg.232]

Potassium nitrate is being used increasingly on intensive crops such as tomatoes, potatoes, tobacco, leafy vegetables, citms, and peaches. The properties that make it particularly desirable for these crops are low salt index, nitrate nitrogen, favorable N K20 ratio, negligible CU content, and alkaline residual reaction in the soil. The low hygroscopicity of KNO (Table 9) leads to its use in direct appHcation and in mixtures. It is an excellent fertilizer but the high cost of production limits its use to specialty fertilizers. [Pg.232]

Coal is expected to be the best domestic feedstock alternative to natural gas. Although coal-based ammonia plants have been built elsewhere, there is no such plant in the United States. Pilot-scale projects have demonstrated effective ammonia-from-coal technology (102). The cost of ammonia production can be anticipated to increase, lea ding to increases in the cost of producing nitrogen fertilizers. [Pg.243]

The 1993 prices and values of fertilizer products consumed in the United States are summarized in Table 16. The prices given are fob production sites or principal terminals thus costs to farmers are greater by virtue of shipping and handling costs and local dealer profits. [Pg.246]

The tabulation of plant nutrient costs, by product, ia Table 16 shows the principal reasoa for the popularity of anhydrous ammonia as a fertilizer ia the United States. The fob price per ton of nitrogen in the form of ammonia is less than half that for any other nitrogen product. Also, ammonia s relatively high nitrogen content of 82.2% favors low transportation costs, in spite of the need for specialized handling equipment and procedures. [Pg.246]

Fertiliser Investment and Production Costs, report of the World Bank to the 9th Session of the FAO Commission on Fertilizers, Rome, Feb. 1985. [Pg.248]

Concern over contaminants entering the food chain through fertilizer removed the first option. Increased cost and regulation has all but removed the second. Thus concentration, or recycling, has become more attractive and ia many cases even a necessity. [Pg.190]

Urea—Other Aldehyde Reaction Products. Urea can also react with other aldehydes to form slow release nitrogen fertilizers. However, cost constraints associated with higher aldehydes have either precluded or limited broad commercial development of these products. Two exceptions are isobutyhdene diurea (IBDU), registered trademark of Vigoro Industries, and crotonyHdene diurea (CDU), registered trademark of Chisso-Asahi Fertilizer Co. [Pg.132]

Sulfur-Coated Fertilizers. Sulfur-coated urea technology (SCU) was developed in the 1960s and 1970s by the Tennessee Valley Authority, now called the National Fertilizer and Environmental Research Center. A commercial-scale demonstration plant (9.1 t/h) was put in operation by TVA in late 1978. Sulfur was chosen as the principle coating material because of its low cost and its value as a secondary nutrient. [Pg.134]

Nutrients are released from POLYON-coated fertilizers by osmotic diffusion. The RLC process permits appHcation of ultrathin, hence lower cost, membrane coatings which distinguishes this technology from many other polymer-coated fertilizers. The coating thickness determines the diffusion rate and the duration of release. POLYON-coated urea at a 4% coating (44% N) will release at twice the rate and will have half the duration as an 8% coating... [Pg.137]

Other advantages claimed for the disc graniilator include low equipment cost, sensitivity to operating controls, and easy observation of the granulation/classification action, all of which lend versatility in agglomerating many different materials. Dusty materials and Chernies reactions such as the ammoniation of fertilizer are handled less readily in the disc granulator than in the drum. [Pg.1894]


See other pages where Fertilizer costs is mentioned: [Pg.514]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.220]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 ]




SEARCH



Cost of fertilizers

Energy costs, fertilizers

© 2024 chempedia.info