Corrosion scientists

The thermodynamic phase stability diagrams appear to be preferred by corrosion scientists and technologists for the evaluation of gas-metal systems where the chemical composition of the gaseous phase consisting of a single gas or mixture of gases has a critical influence on the formation of surface reaction products which, in turn, may either stifle or accelerate the rate of corrosion. Also, they are used to analyse or predict the reason for the sequence of formation of the phases in a multi-layered surface reaction product on a metal or alloy. 

This does not, of course, mean that improvements should not be attempted. It is important, however, that corrosion scientists and technologists appreciate that significant hidden costs may arise when a novel solution is considered. A considerable effort is needed to ensure that the information needed by the design engineer is available when it is needed, and that all the parties concerned understand what is required. The documentation needed can be large, and requires an input from a number of disciplines even when it has been produced, much more effort from experienced staff is likely to be needed than if a standard solution were used. 

Dent Wed P (1977) A review of the history and practice of patination, NBSSP 479. Proceedings of a Seminar, Corrosion and Metal Artifacts - A Dialogue Between Conservators and Archaeologists and Corrosion Scientists held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 17 and 18, 1976, 77-92. 

Corrosion necessarily involves a reaction of a material with its environment at a solid-gas, solid-liquid or solid-solid interface. One might think, therefore, that corrosion scientists would be among the most enthusiastic users of surface analytical techniques, which by their nature examine such interfaces (5). However, as McIntyre (5) notes about XPS, "the impact on corrosion science has been rather modest," and according to an editorial in Corrosion (6), any significance of surface science in solving corrosion problems is not obvious to many corrosion professionals and plant operators. Recent advances in surface science techniques have increased the usefulness of these methods in applied areas such as corrosion. To understand the current role of surface analysis in corrosion research and problem solving, it is necessary to know about the many forms of corrosion and the advantages and limitations of surface techniques in each area. 

In 1945, Marcel Pourbaix submitted a Ph.D. dissertation entitled Thermodynamics in dilute solutions graphical representation of the role of pH and potential. It was initially rejected, or so the legend goes. Fortunately for corrosion scientists... 

After selection of the material, the corrosion scientist must play a role in designing the equipment so that the design is appropriate, and avoids corrosion modes due to inappropriate design. Improper design may result in galvanic corrosion, crevice corrosion,... 

For the corrosion scientist it will be easy to remember that any metal for which E° is negative is liable to corrode in acid, while those having a positive value of E° will not. This rule of thumb should not be taken as being exact, since in situations of practical interest the system is rarely, if ever, under standard conditions. Pipelines rarely carry 1.0 M acid, and metal structures are not, as a rule, in contact with a one-molar solution of their ions. For any specific system of known composition and pH, the reversible potential can readily be calculated from the Nemst equation, and the thermodynamic stability with respect to corrosion can be determined. 

In spite of the foregoing limitations, the corrosion scientist and engineer can derive a wealth of information by consulting the relevant potential/pH diagrams. The regions of immunity, passivity, and pos.sible corrosion are demarcated, and the most common corrosion products are shown. Studying the relevant diagram is an excellent way to start a new corrosion study, but it. should never be the only tool used to solve the problem. 

Because both the black and the green materials contain aluminum oxide or hydroxide, a cause for the black color must be found. The amorphous copper material that shows in the EDAX results but not on the XRD pattern may be this cause. A possible source of the black color in corroded bronze is suggested by Gettens (13) in his study of the corrosion of an ancient Chinese fragment. He attributes a black color in the corrosion layers to the presence of tenorite (CuO) and states that because it is so amorphous, it gives indistinct diffraction patterns or none at all. In a later paper Gettens (14) repeats his belief that the dark product in bronze corrosion is tenorite and stresses the need for further analysis. Plenderleith (15) agrees that the dark material in bronze corrosion is tenorite, but much debate continues as evidenced by a more recently published discussion between corrosion scientists and museum conservators (16). 

Dissolution of the chlorides from the corrosion products is an essential part of the conservation process. It is essential that the artefact is immersed in an electrolyte that will not corrode the metal any further, while this dissolution is taking place. Corrosion scientists have developed redox potential - pH diagrams from thermodynamics in order to predict the most stable form of the metal. These diagrams are divided into three zones. Where metal ions are the most stable phase, this is classed as a zone of corrosion. If the metal itself is the most stable species, this is said to be the zone of immunity. The third zone is where solid metal compounds such as oxides, hydroxides, etc, are the most stable and may form a protective layer over the metal surface. This zone is termed passivity and the metal will not corrode as long as this film forms a protective barrier. The thickness of this passive layer may only be approximately 10 nm thick but as long as it covers the entire metal surface, it will prevent further corrosion. 

The above quotation from Georges Urbain has been reprinted from a book written by the corrosion scientist who more than any other person has contributed to the thermodynamic basis for modem corrosion science and technology, namely the Belgian professor Marcel Pourbaix (1904—1998) [3.1]. 

Corrosion scientists and engineers spend much of their time trying to find ways of stopping corrosion of steel by applying protective coatings. Other metals such as zinc, polymers such as acrylics or epoxies are used to stop corrosive conditions getting to steel snrfaces. The passive layer is the... 

Furthermore, the capacitance associated with this interface is probably that due to the space charge layer within the oxide. Therefore, over the frequency range of most interest to corrosion scientists (10 -10 Hz), VCRe (o, so that... 

Unprecedented coupling between corrosion scientists, geochemists, and risk assessment experts can serve as a useful model for any high-priority thrust in corrosion. Our understanding of corrosion, welding, phase stability, and nickel-chromium-molybdenum superalloys has been advanced to levels equal to any other alloy system. While translation to practice awaits policy and political decisions, this research has led to a vast improvement in corrosion science and to technological confidence that an engineered waste barrier can be perfected to contain nuclear waste. 

Astm s award-winning Manual 20 has been revised and updated to include current and state-of-the-art technologies in corrosion testing and standardization. The editors of this manual have many years of experience in this field and are well qualified in leading the task to provide state-of-the-art information on this subject for corrosion scientists and technologists throughout the world. The work of 80 highly qualified chapter authors and numerous reviewers has resulted in a revised, expanded, and updated Manual 20 on Corrosion Tests and Standards, Application and Inteipre-tation. 

Corrosion scientists seldom have enough replicate data to analyze distributions using such techniques as histograms and tests of fit. Sometimes, however, enough data are available to order and plot as a function of linearized forms of the different kinds of probability distributions. Also, nonlinear least squares curve fitting may be used. The best approach is to choose the type of distribution that cleeirly produces the best approximation to a straight line. If an extreme value distribution is only slightly better than a normal distribution, a normal distribution may be assumed because the statistical techniques are easier to use and more universally understood. 

Corrosion scientists work with two basic types of experiments, (1) controlled and (2) uncontrolled. In controlled experiments, levels of independent variables (factors such as temperature and chemical composition) are controlled and the dependent variables (corrosion rate, pitting potential, etc.) are measured. In uncontrolled experiments such as atmospheric exposures, uncontrolled independent variables such as temperature and relative humidity are measured along with the dependent corrosion results. Properly designed controlled experiments are much more amenable to statistical analysis of variance than are properly designed uncontrolled experiments. Many scientists prefer some form of factorial design for controlled experiments. 

Other DC methods that are quite simple to use and provide important information to the corrosion scientist include polarization resistance (ASTM G 59, Practice for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements), potentiostatic and potentiodynamic polarization measurements (ASTM G 5, Standard Reference Test Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Anodic Polarization Measurements), cyclic polarization measurements (ASTM G 61, Test Method for Conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements for Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Iron-, Nickel-, or Cobalt-based Alloys), and galvanic current monitoring. These DC techniques can be used to estimate the reactivity of a mateiieJ in a peurticular environment, to determine the corrosion rate of a materieJ in a particular environment, and/or to determine the susceptibility of a material to localized corrosion. 

---