Copolymerization anionic monomer reactivity ratio

For any specific type of initiation (i.e., radical, cationic, or anionic) the monomer reactivity ratios and therefore the copolymer composition equation are independent of many reaction parameters. Since termination and initiation rate constants are not involved, the copolymer composition is independent of differences in the rates of initiation and termination or of the absence or presence of inhibitors or chain-transfer agents. Under a wide range of conditions the copolymer composition is independent of the degree of polymerization. The only limitation on this generalization is that the copolymer be a high polymer. Further, the particular initiation system used in a radical copolymerization has no effect on copolymer composition. The same copolymer composition is obtained irrespective of whether initiation occurs by the thermal homolysis of initiators such as AIBN or peroxides, redox, photolysis, or radiolysis. Solvent effects on copolymer composition are found in some radical copolymerizations (Sec. 6-3a). Ionic copolymerizations usually show significant effects of solvent as well as counterion on copolymer composition (Sec. 6-4). 

Monomer reactivity ratios and copolymer compositions in many anionic copolymerizations are altered by changes in the solvent or counterion. Table 6-12 shows data for styrene-isoprene copolymerization at 25°C by n-butyl lithium [Kelley and Tobolsky, 1959]. As in the case of cationic copolymerization, the effects of solvent and counterion cannot be considered independently of each other. For the tightly bound lithium counterion, there are large effects due to the solvent. In poor solvents the copolymer is rich in the less reactive (based on relative rates of homopolymerization) isoprene because isoprene is preferentially complexed by lithium ion. (The complexing of 1,3-dienes with lithium ion is discussed further in Sec. 8-6b). In good solvents preferential solvation by monomer is much less important and the inherent greater reactivity of styrene exerts itself. The quantitative effect of solvent on copolymer composition is less for the more loosely bound sodium counterion. 

For copolymerizations proceeding by the activated monomer mechanism (e.g., cyclic ethers, lactams, /V-carboxy-a-amino acid anhydrides), the actual monomers are the activated monomers. The concentrations of the two activated monomers (e.g., the lactam anions in anionic lactam copolymerization) may be different from the comonomer feed. Calculations of monomer reactivity ratios using the feed composition will then be incorrect. 

For the copolymerization of two monomers by an anionic mechanism, the copolymer composition equation (7.11) or (7.18), derived in Chapter 7 is applicable with the monomer reactivity ratios defined in the same way as the ratios of rate constants r = k /ki2 and T2 = /s22/ 2i> where k and /C22 are the rate constants for the homopropagation reactions ... 

Table 8.3 Representative Monomer Reactivity Ratios in Anionic Copolymerization...

Table 8.3 Some Typical Values of Monomer Reactivity Ratios for Anionic Copolymerization...

Obviously, because of the difference in the reactivity of styrene and DVB, the networks prepared by free radical copolymerization do not relate to such an ideal system with uniform distribution of DVB units and constant chain lengths between the junction points. Also, it was not possible to eliminate this serious defect by an anionic copolymerization of the comonomers. The anionic copolymerization has often been initiated by n- or sec-hutyl lithium [110-112]. Under such conditions, styrene is consumed faster than p-DVB, the monomer reactivity ratios being ri = 1.5S and r2 = 0.32. Therefore, DVB-enriched domains wUl form toward the end of the anionic process. On the other hand, the styrene—m-isomer reactivity ratio (r = 0.65 and r2 = 1.20) points to the local incorporation of m-DVB crosslinks into the initially formed copolymer [113, 114]. In addition, the anionic process is also accompanied by intramolecular cycUzation, similar to radical styrene DVB copolymerization [115,116]. 

For example, monomer reactivity ratios for styime and methyl methacrylate in a free-radical copolymerization are r, = 0.5, rj = 0.44. This represents a statistical copolymerization. Contrast this with the anionic reaction, where r = 0.12 and 2 = 6.4, or the cationic reaction where r = 10.5 and Z2 = 0.1. Obviously, the propagation rates are no longer similar, and this is represented in Figure 5.3, where it can be seen that the anionic technique produces a copolymer rich in methyl methacrylate, whereas the cationic system leads to a copolymer with a high styrene content. 

The monomer reactivity ratios in the anionic copolymerization of methacrylates are listed in Tables 17 and 18. ) in the copdyn rizations of... 

Table 18. Monomer reactivity ratios in the anionic copolymerization of methacrylates... 

The hrst section covers the basic principles and characteristics necessary for polymer preparation by polymerization, being either (a) stepwise polymerization of bifunctional monomers by polycondensation, stepwise polyaddition and ringopening processes, or (b) chain polymerization of vinyl monomers by free radical, cationic, anionic, and coordination addition processes. Both of these polymerization techniques are used for polymer preparation from monomer. The goal of the polymerization technique is to obtain polymers with specific structures and properties -this generally requires specialized polymerization conditions. Also described are the factors affecting the rates of homo- and copolymerizations and the reactivity ratios of different comonomers. 

Tapered Block Copolymers. The alkyllithium-initiated copolymerizations of styrene with dienes, especially isoprene and butadiene, have been extensively investigated and illustrate the important aspects of anionic copolymerization. As shown in Table 15, monomer reactivity ratios for dienes copolymerizing with styrene in hydrocarbon solution range from approximately 8 to 17, while the corresponding monomer reactivity ratios for styrene vary from 0.04 to 0.25. Thus, butadiene and isoprene are preferentially incorporated into the copolymer initially. This type of copolymer composition is described as either a tapered block copolymer or a graded block copolymer. The monomer sequence distribution can be described by the structures below ... 

The sequence distribution of two copolymerizing monomers depends on the catalyst or initiator used, the method of pol5merization, and the concentration and reactivities of the monomers. Reactivity ratios for many monomer pairs have been measured for free-radical, anionic, and coordination polymerization of butadiene (128). 

Methylthiophene/styrene copolymers Methyl methacrylate does not homopolymerize or copolymerize if present in the monomer feed during the oxidation of 3-methylthiophene. This is the reason that its copolymer with 3-MT is prepared indirectly as described above. Its homopolymerization is generally initiated by anions or free radicals. Styrene, however, undergoes a random copolymerization when present during the chemical oxidation of 3-methylthiophene initiated with anhydrous FeCls [73]. Monomer reactivity ratios for the copolymerizations in methylene chloride and nitrobenzene at 5°C are reported, but there is considerable scatter in the Fineman-Ross plots. The proposed structure of the 3-MT/stryrene copolymer is shown in Figure 11.16, where R = H. 

Studies of the copolymerizations of 1,1-diphenylethylene and dienes showed rather different behavior compared with the copolymerizations of styrene and 1,1-diphenylethylene [125, 133-136]. The monomer reactivity ratios for copolymerizations of dienes with DPE are shown in Table 7. When butadiene was copolymerized with 1,1-diphenylethylene in benzene at 40 °C with -butyl-lithium as initiator, the monomer reactivity ratio for butadiene, ri, was 54 this means that the addition of butadiene to the butadienyl anion is 54 times faster than addition of 1,1-diphenylethylene to the butadienyl anion [133]. This unreactivity of poly(butadienyl)lithium towards addition to DPE was also observed in studies of end-capping of poly(butadienyl)lithium with DPE in hydrocarbon solution (see Sect.3.3) [109, 111]. Because of this unfavorable monomer reactivity ratio, few DPE units would be incorporated into the co-... 

The anionic copolymerization of styrene and l-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-1-phenylethylene in benzene has been investigated [188]. As discussed previously in Sect. 5, Yuki and coworkers [125, 126, 129, 133-136] have developed the formalism for analyzing the kinetics of copolymerization of 1,1-diphenylethylene (M2) with styrene and diene monomers (Mi). It was assumed that the 1,1-diphenylethylene derivative, M2, does not add to itself due to steric effects, i.e., k22=0, as discussed previously in Sect 5. Thus, the monomer reactivity ratio for M2 is zero, i.e., r2- 22l ii- - It was also assumed that the styrene monomer is completely consumed at the end of the polymerization... 

It was anticipated that the copolymerization of substituted 1,1-dipheny-lethylenes with dienes such as butadiene and isoprene would be complicated by the very unfavorable monomer reactivity ratio for the addition of poly(-dienyl)lithium compounds to 1,1-diphenylethylene [133, 134]. Yuki and Oka-moto [133, 134] calculated values of ri=54 and ri=29 in hydrocarbon solutions for the copolymerization of 1,1-diphenylethylene (M2) with butadiene (Mi) and isoprene (Mi), respectively. Although the corresponding values in THE are ri(butadiene)=0.13 and ri(isoprene)=0.12, this would not be an acceptable solution since THE is known to form polymers with high 1,2-microstructures [3]. Anionic copolymerizations of butadiene (Mi) with excess l-(4-dimethyla-mino-phenyl)-l-phenylethylene (M2) were conducted in benzene at room temperature for 24-48 h using scc-butyllithium as initiator [189]. Anisole, triethy-lamine and ferf-butyl methyl ether were added in ratios of [B]/[RLi]=60, 20, 30, respectively, to promote copolymerization and minimize 1,2-enchainment in the polybutadiene units. Narrow molecular weight distribution copolymers with Mn=14xl0 to 32x10 (Mw/Mn=1.02-1.03) and 8, 12, and 30 amine... 

Another important consequence of the limitations concerning cross-addition is that anionic polymerization is not suited for the synthesis of random copolymers. If a mixture of two anionically polymerizable monomers is reacted with an initiator, the most electrophilic monomer will polymerize while the other is left almost untouched 30). In other words, a general feature of anionic binary copolymerization is that one of the reactivity ratios is extremely high while the other is close to zero. 

---