Styrene isoprene copolymerization

Monomer reactivity ratios and copolymer compositions in many anionic copolymerizations are altered by changes in the solvent or counterion. Table 6-12 shows data for styrene-isoprene copolymerization at 25°C by n-butyl lithium [Kelley and Tobolsky, 1959]. As in the case of cationic copolymerization, the effects of solvent and counterion cannot be considered independently of each other. For the tightly bound lithium counterion, there are large effects due to the solvent. In poor solvents the copolymer is rich in the less reactive (based on relative rates of homopolymerization) isoprene because isoprene is preferentially complexed by lithium ion. (The complexing of 1,3-dienes with lithium ion is discussed further in Sec. 8-6b). In good solvents preferential solvation by monomer is much less important and the inherent greater reactivity of styrene exerts itself. The quantitative effect of solvent on copolymer composition is less for the more loosely bound sodium counterion. 

A plot of the mole fraction of isoprene in the SFR prepared copolymers as a function of the mole fraction of isoprene in the feed is shown in Figure 2. The data points are the results for the SFRP process initiated with BPO at 125 C in the presence of TEMPO the curve represents data reported by Wiley and Davis (6) for a conventional styrene/isoprene copolymerization initiated with peroxide at 100 C. The... 

The surprising result is that the fastest rate constant is associated with the crossover reaction of the poly(styryl)lithium chain ends with butadiene monomer (/isb) conversely, the slowest reaction rate is associated with the crossover reaction of the poly(butadienyl)lithium chain ends with styrene monomer ( gg). Similar kinetic results have been obtained for styrene-isoprene copolymerization [204]. 

G-5—G-9 Aromatic Modified Aliphatic Petroleum Resins. Compatibihty with base polymers is an essential aspect of hydrocarbon resins in whatever appHcation they are used. As an example, piperylene—2-methyl-2-butene based resins are substantially inadequate in enhancing the tack of 1,3-butadiene—styrene based random and block copolymers in pressure sensitive adhesive appHcations. The copolymerization of a-methylstyrene with piperylenes effectively enhances the tack properties of styrene—butadiene copolymers and styrene—isoprene copolymers in adhesive appHcations (40,41). Introduction of aromaticity into hydrocarbon resins serves to increase the solubiHty parameter of resins, resulting in improved compatibiHty with base polymers. However, the nature of the aromatic monomer also serves as a handle for molecular weight and softening point control. 

TABLE 6-12 Effect of Solvent and Counterion on Copolymer Composition in Styrene-Isoprene Anionic Copolymerization ... 

Copolymerization of styrene with diolefins provides further support that monomer coordinates with the cationic site prior to addition. Korotkov (218) showed that in homopolymerizations styrene is more reactive than butadiene, but in copolymerization the butadiene reacted first at its homopolymerization rate and when it was exhausted the styrene reacted at its homopolymerization rate. This interesting result has been duplicated by Kuntz (245) and analogous results have been obtained by Spirin and coworkers (237) for the styrene-isoprene system. Presumably, the diene complexes more strongly than styrene with the lithium and excludes styrene from the site. That the complex occurs at a cationic site, rather than at the anion or the metal-carbon bond, is indicated by the fact that dienes form more stable complexes than styrene with Lewis acids (246). It should be emphasized that selective monomer coordination is not the only factor influencing reactivities in copolymerizations. Of greatest importance are the relative reactivities of the different polymer anions. The more resonance-stabilized anion is more readily formed and is less reactive for polymerizing the co-monomer. 

The value of the exponent in eqn. (106) lies in the range 1 m 2. Monomers of widely differing polarity represent the extreme case with m = 2. This behaviour is observed, for example, with the pairs styrene—methyl methacrylate and acrylonitrile—methyl methacrylate. The other extreme, represented by the condition (105), was observed in copolymerizing monomers of very similar polarity with m = 1 (e. g. styrene—isoprene). The rate of co-addition generally increases with increasing temperature, and m decreases to 1, even for very dissimilar monomers (acrylonitrile—methyl methacrylate [194]). 

Similarly to styrene, isoprene (IP) also yields almost random copolymers with DXL 156). Typical results of copolymerization are summarized in Table 7.21. 

If the nitroxide does leave the vicinity of the propagating chain end then the reactivity ratios for the radicals should also be the same as in conventional radical polymerizations. However, if the capping and uncapping rates for the two monomers are different this would lead to different concentrations of the two types of propagating chain ends relative to what would be present in a conventional radical polymerization. To address this issue, stable free radical copolymerizations of styrene-isoprene and styrene-acrylonitrile were studied in detail to compare the low conversion copolymer compositions to those prepared by conventional radical polymerization. The microstructure of the polymers was also examined. 

Figure 1. Molecular weight distributions determined by GPC as a function of reaction time (t) for the SFR copolymerization of styrene/isoprene.

Figure 2. Plot of the incorporation of isoprene in the SFR copolymerization of styrene/isoprene (Fi) versus the feed of isoprene in the reaction mixture (fi). The squares are the data points from the SFRP reaction the curve represents data for a conventional radical copolymerization (6),...

Random copolymers of styrene/isoprene and styrene/acrylonitrile have been prepared by stable free radical polymerization. By varying the comonomer mole fractions over the range 0.1-0.9 in low conversion SFRP reactions it has been demonstrated that the incorporation of the two monomers in the copolymer is analogous to that found in conventional free radical copolymerizations. The composition and microstructure of random copolymers prepared by SFRP are not significantly different from those of copolymers synthesized conventionally. These two observations support the conclusion that the presence of nitroxide in the SFR process does not influence the monomer reactivity ratios or the stereoselectivity of the propagating radical chain. Rather, the SFR propagation mechanism is essentially the same as that of the conventional free radical copolymerization process. 

For a typical copolymerization of styrene and butadiene (25/75, wt/wt), the solution is initially almost colorless, corresponding to the dienyllithium chain ends, and the rate of polymerization is slower than the hompolymerization rate of styrene. The homopolymerization rate constants for styrene, isoprene, and butadiene are 1.6 x 10 (l/mol) /s,... 

Electron-withdrawing substituents in anionic polymerizations enhance electron density at the double bonds or stabilize the carbanions by resonance. Anionic copolymerizations in many respects behave similarly to the cationic ones. For some comonomer pairs steric effects give rise to a tendency to altemate. The reactivities of the monomers in copolymerizations and the compositions of the resultant copolymers are subject to solvent polarity and to the effects of the counterions. The two, just as in cationic polymerizations, cannot be considered independently from each other. This, again, is due to the tightness of the ion pairs and to the amount of solvation. Furthermore, only monomers that possess similar polarity can be copolymerized by an anionic mechanism. Thus, for instance, styrene derivatives copolymerize with each other. Styrene, however, is unable to add to a methyl methacrylate anion, though it copolymerizes with butadiene and isoprene. In copolymerizations initiated by w-butyllithium in toluene and in tetrahydrofuran at-78 °C, the following order of reactivity with methyl methacrylate anions was observed. In toluene the order is diphenylmethyl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate > trityl methacrylate > a,a -dimethyl-benzyl methacrylate. In tetrahydrofuran the order changes to trityl methacrylate > benzyl methacrylate > methyl methacrylate > diphenylmethyl methacrylate > ethyl methacrylate > a-methylbenzyl methacrylate > isopropyl methacrylate > a,a -dimethylbenzyl methacrylate > t-butyl methacrylate. 

The NIR in situ process also allowed for the determination of intermediate sequence distribution in styrene/isoprene copolymers, poly(diene) stereochemistry quantification, and identification of complete monomer conversion. The classic one-step, anionic, tapered block copolymerization of isoprene and styrene in hydrocarbon solvents is shown in Figure 4. The ultimate sequence distribution is defined using four rate constants involving the two monomers. NIR was successfully utilized to monitor monomer conversion during conventional, anionic solution polymerization. The conversion of the vinyl protons in the monomer to methylene protons in the polymer was easily monitored under conventional (10-20% solids) solution polymerization conditions. Despite the presence of the NIR probe, the living nature of the polymerizations was maintained in... 

Similar effects on copolymer composition, total conversion, and RMM-control in the styrene-isoprene system were found, with the analogous traces for Fig. 19 shifted to slightly more anodic values, with a better total conversion at high potential imder ultrasound. In both systems, sonications were run in a bath at 25 kHz. The copolymerization of a-methyl- and 4-bromostyrene was also examined, 7 again with similar effect, using a small "Buehler-type probe (25 kHz). No sonochemical polymerization of the monomer occurs over a 24-h period in the absence of an electric potential. 

There are also other approaches to polymer stabilization (Aldiss 1989). For example, it was found that the formation of composites of two conducting polymers, one of which is air stable, improves the stability of polymer materials. Experiments carried out with pyrrole/polyacetylene and polyaniline/ polyacetylene composites have shown that the composites appeared to be more stable than doped polyacetylene and possessed mechanical properties similar to polyacetylene. Stabilization can also be achieved chemically by copolymerization. In particular, it was found that copolymerization of acetylene with other monomers such as styrene, isoprene, ethylene, or butadiene was accompanied by the increase of improvement of polymer stability (Aldiss 1989). Crispin et al. (2003) established that... 

TABLE 27.1 Isoprene/Styrene Statistical Copolymerization Results under CCTP (Excess CTA) and Conventional (Ln/Mg 1 1) Conditions (Precatalyst = Cp La(BH4)2(THF)2, CTA = BEM)... 

AlkyUithium compounds are primarily used as initiators for polymerizations of styrenes and dienes (52). These initiators are too reactive for alkyl methacrylates and vinylpyridines. / -ButyUithium [109-72-8] is used commercially to initiate anionic homopolymerization and copolymerization of butadiene, isoprene, and styrene with linear and branched stmctures. Because of the high degree of association (hexameric), -butyIUthium-initiated polymerizations are often effected at elevated temperatures (>50° C) to increase the rate of initiation relative to propagation and thus to obtain polymers with narrower molecular weight distributions (53). Hydrocarbon solutions of this initiator are quite stable at room temperature for extended periods of time the rate of decomposition per month is 0.06% at 20°C (39). 

Over 5.5 billion pounds of synthetic rubber is produced annually in the United States. The principle elastomer is the copolymer of butadiene (75%) and styrene (25) (SBR) produced at an annual rate of over 1 million tons by the emulsion polymerization of butadiene and styrene. The copolymer of butadiene and acrylonitrile (Buna-H, NBR) is also produced by the emulsion process at an annual rate of about 200 million pounds. Likewise, neoprene is produced by the emulsion polymerization of chloroprene at an annual rate of over 125,000 t. Butyl rubber is produced by the low-temperature cationic copolymerization of isobutylene (90%) and isoprene (10%) at an annual rate of about 150,000 t. Polybutadiene, polyisoprene, and EPDM are produced by the anionic polymerization of about 600,000, 100,000, and 350,000 t, respectively. Many other elastomers are also produced. 

The general characteristics of anionic copolymerization are very similar to those of cationic copolymerization. There is a tendency toward ideal behavior in most anionic copolymerizations. Steric effects give rise to an alternating tendency for certain comonomer pairs. Thus the styrene-p-methylstyrene pair shows ideal behavior with t = 5.3, fy = 0.18, r fy = 0.95, while the styrene-a-methylstyrene pair shows a tendency toward alternation with t — 35, r% = 0.003, i ii 2 — 0.11 [Bhattacharyya et al., 1963 Shima et al., 1962]. The steric effect of the additional substituent in the a-position hinders the addition of a-methylstyrene to a-methylstyrene anion. The tendency toward alternation is essentially complete in the copolymerizations of the sterically hindered monomers 1,1-diphenylethylene and trans-, 2-diphe-nylethylene with 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, and 2,3-dimethyl-l,3-butadiene [Yuki et al., 1964]. 

Penultimate effects have been observed for many comonomer pairs. Among these are the radical copolymerizations of styrene-fumaronitrile, styrene-diethyl fumarate, ethyl methacrylate-styrene, methyl methacrylate l-vinylpyridine, methyl acrylate-1,3-butadiene, methyl methacrylate-methyl acrylate, styrene-dimethyl itaconate, hexafluoroisobutylene-vinyl acetate, 2,4-dicyano-l-butene-isoprene, and other comonomer pairs [Barb, 1953 Brown and Fujimori, 1987 Buback et al., 2001 Burke et al., 1994a,b, 1995 Cowie et al., 1990 Davis et al., 1990 Fordyce and Ham, 1951 Fukuda et al., 2002 Guyot and Guillot, 1967 Hecht and Ojha, 1969 Hill et al., 1982, 1985 Ma et al., 2001 Motoc et al., 1978 Natansohn et al., 1978 Prementine and Tirrell, 1987 Rounsefell and Pittman, 1979 Van Der Meer et al., 1979 Wu et al., 1990 Yee et al., 2001 Zetterlund et al., 2002]. Although ionic copolymerizations have not been as extensively studied, penultimate effects have been found in some cases. Thus in the anionic polymerization of styrene t-vinylpyri-dine, 4-vinylpyridine adds faster to chains ending in 4-vinylpyridine if the penultimate unit is styrene [Lee et al., 1963]. 

---