Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conversion yield

A brief review has appeared covering the use of metal-free initiators in living anionic polymerizations of acrylates and a comparison with Du Font s group-transfer polymerization method (149). Tetrabutylammonium thiolates mn room temperature polymerizations to quantitative conversions yielding polymers of narrow molecular weight distributions in dipolar aprotic solvents. Block copolymers are accessible through sequential monomer additions (149—151) and interfacial polymerizations (152,153). [Pg.170]

The i j -configuration of the 6,7-double bond in pre-vitamin D is critical to its subsequent thermal rearrangement to the active vitamin. A photochemical isomerization of pre-vitamin D to yield the inactive trans-isoTnen occurs under conditions of synthesis, and is especially detrimental if there is a significant short wavelength component, eg, 254 nm, to the radiation continuum used to effect the synthesis. This side reaction reduces overall yield of the process and limits conversion yields to ca 60% (71). Photochemical reconversion of the inactive side product, tachysterol, to pre-vitamin D allows recovery of the product which would otherwise be lost, and improves economics of the overall process (70). [Pg.392]

The pH of the chlorine dioxide reaction mixture must be maintained in the 2.8—3.2 pH range, otherwise decreased conversion yields of chlorite to chlorine dioxide are obtained with by-product formation of chlorate. Generator efficiencies of 93% and higher have been demonstrated. A disadvantage of this system is the limited storage life of the sodium hypochlorite oxidant solution. [Pg.487]

Since the catalyst is so important to the cracking operation, its activity, selectivity, and other important properties should be measured. A variety of fixed or fluidized bed tests have been used, in which standard feedstocks are cracked over plant catalysts and the results compared with those for standard samples. Activity is expressed as conversion, yield of gasoline, or as relative activity. Selectivity is expressed in terms of carbon producing factor (CPF) and gas producing factor (GPF). These may be related to catalyst addition rates, surface area, and metals contamination from feedstocks. [Pg.17]

Compound KF (mol equiv) Temp. rc) Time (h) Conversion (%) Yield (%f ... [Pg.192]

The elimination of the amino donor, L-aspartic acid, resulted in an almost complete reduction of activity. Neither cell permeabilisation nor cofactor (pyridoxalphosphate) addition were essential for L-phenylalanine production. Maximum conversion yield occurred (100%, 22 g r) when the amino donor concentration was increased. Aspartic add was a superior amino donor to glutamic add 35 g l 1 was used. [Pg.267]

The final conversion yield decreased when substrate concentration was increased from 2% to 4%. This was attributed to end product inhibition by the L-phenylalanine produced. Thus although faster conversion rates were observed with addition of high substrate concentrations, the product titres never exceeded 16 g l1. As already discussed the rate of yield of the conversion was proportional to the concentration of amino donor employed. Using a ratio of 1 3 substrate to amino donor, almost a 90% conversion was achieved in 3 hours. [Pg.267]

A possible explanation for the superiority of the amino donor, L-aspartic add, has come from studies carried out on mutants of E. coli, in which only one of the three transaminases that are found in E. coli are present. It is believed that a branched chain transaminase, an aromatic amino add transaminase and an aspartate phenylalanine aspartase can be present in E. coli. The reaction of each of these mutants with different amino donors gave results which indicated that branched chain transminase and aromatic amino add transminase containing mutants were not able to proceed to high levels of conversion of phenylpyruvic add to L-phenylalanine. However, aspartate phenylalanine transaminase containing mutants were able to yield 98% conversion on 100 mmol l 1 phenylpyruvic acid. The explanation for this is probably that both branched chain transaminase and aromatic amino acid transminase are feedback inhibited by L-phenylalanine, whereas aspartate phenylalanine transaminase is not inhibited by L-phenylalanine. In addition, since oxaloacetate, which is produced when aspartic add is used as the amino donor, is readily converted to pyruvic add, no feedback inhibition involving oxaloacetate occurs. The reason for low conversion yield of some E. coli strains might be that these E. cdi strains are defident in the aspartate phenylalanine transaminase. [Pg.268]

Application of the desired biotransformation to give a practical and economical process required high molar conversion yields, high amino transferase activities, highly effident product recovery and an inexpensive source of phenylpyruvic add. With genetic and/or biochemical manipulation considerable progress can be made towards meeting some of these requirements. [Pg.268]

The reaction is performed either noncatalytically at temperatures of 600-800°C and at pressures of 30-100 bar, or catalytically on a CoO contact at 550-650°C and at the same pressure of 30-100 bar. A problem of the catalytic process is the poisoning of the catalyst by deposition of coke-like material, but the conversion, yield, and purity of the benzene are better (>99%) in the catalytic than in the noncatalytic process. In the noncatalytic process the benzene selectivity is about 95%, if the conversion of the toluene is kept at 60-80%. [Pg.32]

Reactor Performance Measures. There are four common measures of reactor performance fraction unreacted, conversion, yield, and selectivity. The fraction unreacted is the simplest and is usually found directly when solving the component balance equations. It is a t)/oo for a batch reaction and aout/ciin for a flow reactor. The conversion is just 1 minus the fraction unreacted. The terms conversion and fraction unreacted refer to a specific reactant. It is usually the stoichiometrically limiting reactant. See Equation (1.26) for the first-order case. [Pg.15]

Carboxylation of 20-300 mM 1,2-dihydroxybenzene was carried out using 36.9 mg (as dry cell weight) of whole cells in the presence of 3M KHCO3 in 1 ml of the reaction mixture. The molar conversion yields were almost the same using 20, 100, and 200 mM 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (approximately 25%) as shown in Fig. 7. [Pg.94]

The carboxylafion of indole into indole-3-carboxylate was observed by the purified indole-3-carboxylate decarboxylase as well as by the whole cells. For the carboxylafion reaction, temperatures over 30°C were not appropriate. The activities at 10, 20, and 30°C were about the same. The activity was maximal at pH 8.0 (Tris-HCl buffer, 100 mM). As shown in Fig. 10, the resting cells of A. nicotianae F11612 also catalyzed the carboxylafion of indole efficiently in the reaction mixture containing 20 mM indole, 3M KHCO3, 100mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) in a tightly closed reaction vessel. By 6h, 6.81 mM indole-3-carboxylic acid accumulated in the reaction mixture with a molar conversion yield of 34%. Compared to the carhoxylation of pyrrole by pyrrole-2-carboxylate decarboxylase, the lower value compared might derive from the lower solubility of indole in the reaction mixture. [Pg.100]

In case of (3-glucosidation using a large amount of alcohol, the ratio of alcohol, H2O and D-glucose was studied for improvement of conversion yield by Vic and Grout. By applying the reported procedure, a mixture of D-glucose... [Pg.263]

OS 30] [R 30] [P 22] By simple flow switching, serial combinatorial synthesis for creating a cation pool from diverse carbamates and silyl enol ethers was accomplished (Figure 4.46) [66, 67]. The conversions and selectivities were comparable to continuous processing using three feed streams only (see Conversion/yield/selec-tivity, above). [Pg.447]

OS 49] [R 17] [R 26] [P 36] At almost quantitative conversion, yields of 90% of two (in a first run) unidentified products and of 10% N,N -diethylurea were reported, accompanied by small amoimts of the mono-product [38], AH products no longer contained any C=S moiety, hence were somehow attacked via a nucleophilic route. By subsequent MS and IR analysis, the two main products were identified as N,N -diethyl-N-nitrosourea and, probably, N,N -diefhyl-N,N -dinitrosourea. By optimization of the [P 23] procedure, 100% selectivity for the nitration of N,N -diethylurea to N,N -diethylurea was achieved. [Pg.491]

Throughput is in simple terms the average saleable production output per a given time unit. Cycle time is the average time between the release and completion of a job, in other words, the rate at which products are manufactured. Key parameters that affect throughput in a chemical plant include the chemical conversion, yield, capacity and availability of existing equipment, process time, cycle time, number of chemical steps, number of unit operations, plant layout, warehouse processes, raw material availability, process bottlenecks and labour availability, amongst others. [Pg.239]

The present section deals with the improvement in the performance of biocatalysis when carried out in organic-aqueous biphasic systems. Such systems are very useful in equilibrium reactions and conversion yield where substrates and products can be dissolved and drawn into different phases. Subsequently the synthesis in the reactive aqueous phase is allowed to continue. [Pg.575]

Conversion yields in the bienzymatic system have been optimized by using pure substrates (triglycerides) as well as crude vegetable oils (Table 4) rich in a range of polyunsaturated fatty acids (sunflower oil or linseed oil). The use of crude reactants approaches a more realistic scenario for the industrial-scale manufacture of hydropexides. [Pg.576]

TABLE 4 Yields of Different Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions in Biphasic Media. 100% Conversion Yield Corresponds to the Total Conversion of Substrate to Product... [Pg.577]

Enzyme system Reaction Biphasic medium Conversion yield (%) Reference... [Pg.577]

Ion trap MS is particularly suited for chemical structure elucidation, as it allows for simultaneous ion storage, ion activation and fragmentation, and product ion analysis. The fragmentation pathway of selected ions and the fragmentation products provide information on the molecular structure. Compared with triple-quadrupole and especially with sector instruments, the ion trap instrument provides more efficient conversion of precursor ion into product ions. However, the CID process via resonance excitation, although quite efficient in terms of conversion yield, generally results in only one (major) product ion in the product-ion mass spectrum. MS/MS with a quadrupole ion trap offers a number of advantages ... [Pg.402]

Amino acids containing nucleobases like uracil and adenine, as well as imidazole, such as / -(uraciM-yl)-a-alanine, j5-(adenin-9-yl)-a-alanine, and j8-(imidazol-l-yl)-a-alanine, can also be polycondensed by CDI in aqueous imidazole buffer solution at pH 6.8 at 0 °C. The polycondensation leads to low conversion (yields of polymer 1% after four days), but pure polypeptides resulted from the reaction. Thus, compared to other alternative procedures for polycondensation, that using CDI proved to be the most effective 503... [Pg.160]

Catalyst ch2o conversion (%) Yield of HCOOHb (%) TONc... [Pg.430]


See other pages where Conversion yield is mentioned: [Pg.486]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.431]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 , Pg.36 , Pg.260 , Pg.262 , Pg.264 , Pg.267 , Pg.275 , Pg.276 , Pg.277 , Pg.278 , Pg.279 , Pg.280 , Pg.281 , Pg.307 , Pg.313 ]




SEARCH



Biomass yield, conversion factors

Conversion Yield Calculations

Conversion selectivity, yield

Conversion, Liquid Yield, Coke Content

Overall conversion related yield

Point-yield conversion

Quantum yield internal conversion

Relationship Between Conversion, Selectivity, and Yield

Spin conversion charge separation yield

Yield, Conversion and Selectivity

Yield, conversion factors

© 2024 chempedia.info