Two-Reactant Approach

This equation shows, that the single-reactant indices are the lst-order criteria. Indeed, for the fixed perturbations [Aa, Ax(ij)] and [Aa, Ax(r2)] due to the same agent attacking the two alternative locations rj and r2 in a molecule, the trends in A F xfri)] and Al/ija,x(r2) are reflected by those in /i Cr, ) and /iJt.(r2), so that the local potential constitute a valid single-reactant reactivity criterion. The embedding energy contributions are of the 2nd-order in such a perturbational approach. 

In order to determine the 2nd-order energy A2 [a, x] the knowledge of the system response quantities (generalized polarizabilities) is needed [3-8,12,80-84]. In what follows the response of the potential Ea or ,-(r), Per unit value of the displacement in the stimulus b or Xj(r ). for the fixed values of the remaining state-parameters, will be called the molecular charge sensitivity (CS). Such quantities are defined by the relevant second partial derivatives of the system electronic energy  

These normalized response quantities determine the corresponding embedding energy contributions, the quadratic functions of the reaction stimuli Aa and Ax(r). 

For example, in the case of a single global (a) and local (x) state-variables the 2nd-order energy includes the following terms  

Such embedding energy contributions are included in all 2nd-order perturba-tional approaches to chemical reactivity [3-13,47,51,52,57,73,75,80,83,85-89]. 

---

The reaction between a K atom and a CH I molecule takes place by a different mechanism. A collision leads to reaction only if the two reactants approach each other very closely. In this mechanism, the K atom effectively bumps into a brick wall, and the KI product bounces out in the backward direction. 

Finally, a possible use of these coupling constants as reactivity indices has been commented upon in both the one- and two-reactant approaches. In the interreactant decoupled applications the molecular compliants, obtained from calculations on separate reactants, can be used directly to qualitatively predict the intrareactant effects resulting from the interreactant CT. The building blocks of the combined electronic-nuclear Hessian for the two-reactant system have been discussed. The corresponding blocks of the generalized compliance matrix have also been identified. In such a complete, two-reactant treatment of reactants in the combined system, the additional calculations on the reactive system as a whole would be required. 

Nalewajski, R. F.1997. Consistent two-reactant approach to chemisorption complexes in charge sensitivity analysis. In Developments in the Theory of Chemical Reactivity and Heterogeneous Catalysis. (Eds.) W. M. Mortier, and R. A. Schoonheydt, pp. 135-196. Trivandrum Research Signpost. 

Nalewajski, R. F. and A. Michalak. 1996. Charge sensitivity and bond-order analysis of reactivity trends in allyl-IMoOd Systems Two-reactant approach. J. Phys. Chem. 100 20076-20088. 

It was pointed out in Chap. 8, Sect. 2.1 that there are primarily two reasons for the failure of the diffusion equation to describe molecular motion on short times. They are connected with each other. A molecule moving in a solvent does not forget entirely the direction it was travelling prior to a collision [271, 502]. The velocity after the collision is, to some degree, correlated with its velocity before the collision. In essence, the Boltzmann assumption of molecular chaos is unsatisfactory in liquids [453, 490, 511—513]. The second consideration relates to the structure of the solvent (discussed in Chap. 8, Sects. 2.5 and 2.6). Because the solvent molecules interact with each other, despite the motion of solvent molecules, some structure develops and persists over several molecular diameters [451,452a]. Furthermore, as two reactants approach each other, the solvent molecules between them have to be squeezed-out of the way before the reactants can collide [70, 456]. These effects have been considered in a rather heuristic fashion earlier. While the potential of mean force has little overall effect on the rate of reaction, its effect on the probability of recombination or escape is rather more significant (Chap. 8, Sect. 2.6). Hydrodynamic repulsion can lead to a reduction in the rate of reaction by as much as 30-40% under the most favourable circumstances (see Chap. 8, Sect. 2.5 and Chap. 9, Sect. 3) [70, 71]. 

Figure 7 Qualitative depiction of the energy profile along the reaction co-ordinate for the Sn2 reaction Cl ICII3CI >CICn3 I Cl, which involves nucleophilic substitution of the chloride of methylchloride by a chloride ion. The potential energy curves drop as the two reactants approach until a loose complex is formed. Then the energy rises rapidly to the transition state, which has two equal C-Cl interatomic distances (zero on the abscissa). The energy profile looks quite different in the gas and solution phases. Compared to the reactants (or products), the loose complex and the TS are poorly solvated, so the energies for these are much higher in solution than in a vacuum.

In the second stage, the temperature is raised and vacuum is applied to remove the free glycol. Reaction continues to produce polsmier and glycol, which is removed, and the two reactants approach exact balance and high molecular wei t is achieved. ... 

A naive description of the main steps of a reactive event can be sketched two reactants approach each other in the reaction medium, and the result of such approach (collision) may or may not lead to the products, depending both on the molecular states and reciprocal orientation and the interactions with the medium. While liquid phase reactions are favourite in laboratories, solid matrices are also used as reaction media. Among solids, zeolites, with their arrays of molecular sized cages and channels, are used as reaction pots in many synthetic processes both in research laboratories and in large scale industrial plants. 

In the transition state theory of reactions it is supposed that as two reactants approach, their potential energy rises and reaches a maximum, as illustrated by the reaction profile in Fig. 7.1. This maximum corresponds to the formation of an activated complex, a cluster of atoms that is poised to pass on to products or to collapse back into the reactants from which it was formed (Fig. 7.16). The concept of an activated complex is applicable to reactions in solutions as well as to the gas phase because we can think of the activated complex as perhaps involving any solvent molecules that maybe present. 

E. Direct chemical reactions are fast. Suppose the two reactants approach one another and suddenly switch into products that then depart. By analogy with the scattering amplitude for elastic collisions, Eq. (4.36), we can now write the amplitude forreactionasexp(i5out) 6 / exp(i5ji,), where P b) = S/. Show that this amplitude accounts not only for the deflection angle having the form in the text but also for the fact that there is no time delay due to the reaction itself The delay is entirely made up from any excess time it takes the reactants to move in, and similarly for the products. 

---