Cathode potentials

Anodic stripping voltammetry consists of two steps (Figure 11.37). The first is a controlled potential electrolysis in which the working electrode, usually a hanging mercury drop or mercury film, is held at a cathodic potential sufficient to deposit the metal ion on the electrode. For example, with Cu + the deposition reaction is... 

Solvent for Electrolytic Reactions. Dimethyl sulfoxide has been widely used as a solvent for polarographic studies and a more negative cathode potential can be used in it than in water. In DMSO, cations can be successfully reduced to metals that react with water. Thus, the following metals have been electrodeposited from their salts in DMSO cerium, actinides, iron, nickel, cobalt, and manganese as amorphous deposits zinc, cadmium, tin, and bismuth as crystalline deposits and chromium, silver, lead, copper, and titanium (96—103). Generally, no metal less noble than zinc can be deposited from DMSO. 

It must be noted that impurities in the ionic liquids can have a profound impact on the potential limits and the corresponding electrochemical window. During the synthesis of many of the non-haloaluminate ionic liquids, residual halide and water may remain in the final product [13]. Halide ions (Cl , Br , I ) are more easily oxidized than the fluorine-containing anions used in most non-haloaluminate ionic liquids. Consequently, the observed anodic potential limit can be appreciably reduced if significant concentrations of halide ions are present. Contamination of an ionic liquid with significant amounts of water can affect both the anodic and the cathodic potential limits, as water can be both reduced and oxidized in the potential limits of many ionic liquids. Recent work by Schroder et al. demonstrated considerable reduction in both the anodic and cathodic limits of several ionic liquids upon the addition of 3 % water (by weight) [14]. For example, the electrochemical window of dry [BMIM][BF4] was found to be 4.10 V, while that for the ionic liquid with 3 % water by weight was reduced to 1.95 V. In addition to its electrochemistry, water can react with the ionic liquid components (especially anions) to produce products... 

As shown in Figure 3.6-1, GC and Pt exhibit anodic and cathodic potential limits that differ by several tenths of volts. However, somewhat fortuitously, the electrochemical potential windows for both electrodes in this ionic liquid come out to be 4.7 V. What is also apparent from Figure 3.6-1 is that the GC electrode exhibits no significant background currents until the anodic and cathodic potential limits are reached, while the Pt working electrode shows several significant electrochemical processes prior to the potential limits. This observed difference is most probably due to trace amounts of water in the ionic liquid, which is electrochemically active on Pt but not on GC (vide supra). 

Ideally, one would prefer to compare anodic and cathodic potential limits instead of the overall ionic liquid electrochemical window, because difference sets of anodic and cathodic limits can give rise to the same value of electrochemical window (see Figure 3.6-1). However, the lack of a standard reference electrode system within and between ionic liquid systems precludes this possibility. Gonsequently, significant care must be taken when evaluating the impact of changes in the cation or anion on the overall ionic liquid electrochemical window. 

Stainless steels each appear twice in the list. The more active potentials are those which the metal adopts when corroding as in a pit. The more cathodic potential is that adopted by the bare surface around the pit. The potential difference constitutes a significant driving force, analogous to the situation where the coupling of dissimilar metals such as copper and iron promotes the corrosion of the more anodic of the two (see below). 

Graphic estimation of the corrosion rate and corrosion potential of a metal immersed in a corrosive high-conductivity electrolyte, from the intersection of the polarisation curves for the appropriate anodic and cathodic reactions, has been proposed and explained by several authorities. These polarisation curves can be further used to illustrate the effect of imposing additional anodic or cathodic potentials on to a corroding metal (see also Sections 1.4 and 10.1). 

The modern procedure to minimise corrosion losses on underground structures is to use protective coatings between the metal and soil and to apply cathodic protection to the metal structure (see Chapter 11). In this situation, soils influence the operation in a somewhat different manner than is the case with unprotected bare metal. A soil with moderately high salts content (low resistivity) is desirable for the location of the anodes. If the impressed potential is from a sacrificial metal, the effective potential and current available will depend upon soil properties such as pH, soluble salts and moisture present. When rectifiers are used as the source of the cathodic potential, soils of low electrical resistance are desirable for the location of the anode beds. A protective coating free from holidays and of uniformly high insulation value causes the electrical conducting properties of the soil to become of less significance in relation to corrosion rates (Section 15.8). 

In constant-load tests a 22Cr-5Ni-3Mo stainless steel was prevented from cracking by applying a cathodic potential of -130 mV SHE, but the environment for the tests was not specified. Similarly, an 18Cr-1.5Ni steel was prevented from cracking by applying potentials of about -250 mV SHE or less, down to —650 mV, for tests in 42% MgClj at 143°C. 

It reduces current requirements for maintenance of a particular cathodic potential, thereby reducing costs. 

This reaction becomes thermodynamically possible whenever the cathode potential falls below... 

Electroplating passive alloys Another application of strike baths reverses the case illustrated in the previous example. The strike is used to promote a small amount of cathode corrosion. When the passivation potential of a substrate lies below the cathode potential of a plating bath, deposition occurs onto the passive oxide film, and the coating is non-adherent. Stainless steel plated with nickel in normal baths retains its passive film and the coating is easily peeled off. A special strike bath is used with a low concentration of nickel and a high current density, so that diffusion polarisation (transport overpotential) depresses the potential into the active region. The bath has a much lower pH than normal. The low pH raises the substrate passivation potential E pa, which theoretically follows a relation... 

For the electrolysis of a solution to be maintained, the potential applied to the electrodes of the cell (Eapp ) must overcome the decomposition potential of the electrolyte (ED) (which as shown above includes the back e.m.f. and also any overpotential effects), as well as the electrical resistance of the solution. Thus, Eapp must be equal to or greater than (ED + IR), where / is the electrolysis current, and R the cell resistance. As electrolysis proceeds, the concentration of the cation which is being deposited decreases, and consequently the cathode potential changes. 

If the relevant ionic concentration in the solution is c, and the ion concerned has a charge number of 2, then at a temperature of 25 °C, the cathode potential... 

If the ionic concentration is reduced by deposition to one ten-thousandth of its original value, thus giving an accuracy of 0.01 per cent in the determination, the new cathode potential will be ... 

It follows that if the original solution contains two cations whose deposition potentials differ by about 0.25 V, then the cation of higher deposition potential should be deposited without any contamination by the ion of lower deposition potential. In practice, in may be necessary to take steps to ensure that the cathode potential is unable to fall to a level where deposition of the second ion may occur (see Section 12.6). 

ELECTROLYTIC SEPARATION OF METALS WITH CONTROLLED CATHODE POTENTIAL 12.6... 

The nitrate ion is reduced to ammonium ion at a lower (i.e. less negative) cathode potential than that at which hydrogen ion is discharged, and, therefore, acts to decrease hydrogen evolution. The nitrate ion acts as a cathodic depolariser. 

In the common method of electro-gravimetric analysis, a potential slightly in excess of the decomposition potential of the electrolyte under investigation is applied, and the electrolysis allowed to proceed without further attention, except perhaps occasionally to increase the applied potential to keep the current at approximately the same value. This procedure, termed constant-current electrolysis, is (as explained in Section 12.4) of limited value for the separation of mixtures of metallic ions. The separation of the components of a mixture where the decomposition potentials are not widely separated may be effected by the application of controlled cathode potential electrolysis. An auxiliary standard electrode (which may be a saturated calomel electrode with the tip of the salt bridge very close to the cathode or working electrode) is inserted in the... 

It must be emphasised that in evaluating the limiting cathode potential to be applied in the separation of two given metals, simple calculation of the equilbrium potentials from the Nernst Equation is insufficient due account must be taken of any overpotential effects. If we carry out, for each metal, the procedure described in Section 12.2 for determination of decomposition potentials, but include a reference electrode (calomel electrode) in the circuit, then we can ascertain the value of the cathode potential for each current setting and plot the current-potential curves. Schematic current-cathode potential... 

A mercury cathode finds widespread application for separations by constant current electrolysis. The most important use is the separation of the alkali and alkaline-earth metals, Al, Be, Mg, Ta, V, Zr, W, U, and the lanthanides from such elements as Fe, Cr, Ni, Co, Zn, Mo, Cd, Cu, Sn, Bi, Ag, Ge, Pd, Pt, Au, Rh, Ir, and Tl, which can, under suitable conditions, be deposited on a mercury cathode. The method is therefore of particular value for the determination of Al, etc., in steels and alloys it is also applied in the separation of iron from such elements as titanium, vanadium, and uranium. In an uncontrolled constant-current electrolysis in an acid medium the cathode potential is limited by the potential at which hydrogen ion is reduced the overpotential of hydrogen on mercury is high (about 0.8 volt), and consequently more metals are deposited from an acid solution at a mercury cathode than with a platinum cathode.10... 

The principles of electrolysis with controlled cathode potential have been discussed in Section 12.6, and the details given below serve to illustrate the procedure. In this case the amounts of copper and antimony (which are deposited simultaneously) are small, and so the cathode potential can be set immediately to the limiting value, but with the higher proportion of tin it can be set initially to a value which is more positive than the limiting value so as to speed up the deposition process. 

In a similar determination described by Lingane and Jones,11 an alloy containing copper, bismuth, lead, and tin is dissolved in hydrochloric acid as described above, and then 100 mL of sodium tartrate solution (0.1 M) is added, followed by sufficient sodium hydroxide solution (5M) to adjust the pH to 5.0. After the addition of hydrazinium chloride (4 g), the solution is warmed to 70 °C and then electrolysed. Copper is deposited at —0.3 volt, and then sequentially, bismuth at —0.4 volt, and lead at —0.6 volt all cathode potentials quoted are vs the S.C.E. After deposition of the lead, the solution is acidified with hydrochloric acid and the tin then deposited at a cathode potential of — 0.65 volt vs the S.C.E. 

---