Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Potential control technique

There has been some controversy in the electrochemical literature concerning the use of the terms pulse and step in relation to the potential perturbation used in different potential controlled techniques, with no clear distinction between pulses and steps [66]. A brief description of both types of perturbation is provided in this section and a short discussion on the nomenclature is presented. [Pg.63]

Once the differences between both types of potential perturbation are clarified, a question arises about the nature of potential-controlled techniques attending to the nature of the perturbation, are they pulse potential or step potential techniques If the pulse definition is applied in a strict sense, only Single Pulse Voltammetry is a true pulse technique (see Scheme 2.1), whereas the rest of double and multipotential techniques are indeed multistep techniques (see Sects. 4.1, 5.1 and 7.1). [Pg.63]

However, in the electrochemical literature the terms pulse techniques and multipulse techniques are well established and commonly used to define a set of potential-controlled techniques. In order to maintain this nomenclature, the definition of pulse referred to the potential perturbation should be considered as equivalent to that given for a step potential, i.e., without any restriction on the duration of the perturbation and the return to a given resting potential. This will be the criterion followed throughout this book. [Pg.64]

The effect is normally one of degree. The measurement of a corrosion potential does not influence the surface condition. Electrochemical noise and impedance measurements carried out at the corrosion potential also have little effect as does a polarization resistance measurement if the perturbation is small, although rest potential drift may be a problem if potential control techniques are used. Techruques involving large potential differences will in general modify a surface significantly. [Pg.39]

Ma and Lennox demonstrated that this potential control technique for SAM formation is critically effective to deposit two-component mixed SAMs with various compositions otherwise inaccessible using deposition under open-circuit potential... [Pg.6212]

Cathodic protection is an electrochemical technique in which a cathodic (protective) potential is applied to an engineering structure in order to prevent corrosion from taking place. This implies that Ohm s law, E = IR, can be used to control the potential, as well as the current. Hence, metal oxidation is prevented since the potential must be below the corrosion potential (E < Ecorr)- This is the main reason for this potential-control technique. In principle, aU stmctures can be protected cathodicaUy, but stmctural steels being the most common ferrous materials used to build large stmctures are cathodicaUy protected by an external potential (impressed potential). [Pg.248]

The potential Ex is assumed to be constant since anodic protection AP) is a potential-control technique, in which the power supply is a potentiostat capable of supplying a constant potential otherwise, a significant change in potential causes a change in the current and the stmcture may become unprotected due to film breakdown. [Pg.297]

Fig. 18.15 Three-electrode setup for potential-controlled techniques... Fig. 18.15 Three-electrode setup for potential-controlled techniques...
In contrast to many other surface analytical techniques, like e. g. scanning electron microscopy, AFM does not require vacuum. Therefore, it can be operated under ambient conditions which enables direct observation of processes at solid-gas and solid-liquid interfaces. The latter can be accomplished by means of a liquid cell which is schematically shown in Fig. 5.6. The cell is formed by the sample at the bottom, a glass cover - holding the cantilever - at the top, and a silicone o-ring seal between. Studies with such a liquid cell can also be performed under potential control which opens up valuable opportunities for electrochemistry [5.11, 5.12]. Moreover, imaging under liquids opens up the possibility to protect sensitive surfaces by in-situ preparation and imaging under an inert fluid [5.13]. [Pg.280]

Controlled-potential (potentiostatic) techniques deal with the study of charge-transfer processes at the electrode-solution interface, and are based on dynamic (no zero current) situations. Here, the electrode potential is being used to derive an electron-transfer reaction and the resultant current is measured. The role of the potential is analogous to that of the wavelength in optical measurements. Such a controllable parameter can be viewed as electron pressure, which forces the chemical species to gain or lose an electron (reduction or oxidation, respectively). [Pg.2]

FIGURE 4-27 Classification of composite electrodes used in controlled-potential electrochemical techniques. (Reproduced with permission from reference 87.)... [Pg.133]

If a potential carbon monoxide hazard is identified, or confirmed by atmospheric monitoring, the range of control techniques summarized on pages 47—51 must be applied. [Pg.63]

In a similar way, electrochemistry may provide an atomic level control over the deposit, using electric potential (rather than temperature) to restrict deposition of elements. A surface electrochemical reaction limited in this manner is merely underpotential deposition (UPD see Sect. 4.3 for a detailed discussion). In ECALE, thin films of chemical compounds are formed, an atomic layer at a time, by using UPD, in a cycle thus, the formation of a binary compound involves the oxidative UPD of one element and the reductive UPD of another. The potential for the former should be negative of that used for the latter in order for the deposit to remain stable while the other component elements are being deposited. Practically, this sequential deposition is implemented by using a dual bath system or a flow cell, so as to alternately expose an electrode surface to different electrolytes. When conditions are well defined, the electrolytic layers are prone to grow two dimensionally rather than three dimensionally. ECALE requires the definition of precise experimental conditions, such as potentials, reactants, concentration, pH, charge-time, which are strictly dependent on the particular compound one wants to form, and the substrate as well. The problems with this technique are that the electrode is required to be rinsed after each UPD deposition, which may result in loss of potential control, deposit reproducibility problems, and waste of time and solution. Automated deposition systems have been developed as an attempt to overcome these problems. [Pg.162]

When the poisoning reaction is analyzed under potential control, the formation rate is dependent on the electrode potential. The hrst experiments that clearly showed that the poison formation reaction was potential-dependent were performed by Clavilier using pulsed voltammetry [Clavilier, 1987] (Fig. 6.15). In this technique, a short pulse at high potential is superimposed on a normal voltammetric potential... [Pg.181]

As mentioned previously, this can be attributed in part to the lack of structure-sensitive techniques that can operate in the presence of a condensed phase. Ultrahigh-vacuum (UHV) surface spectroscopic techniques such as low-energy electron diffraction (LEED), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and others have been applied to the study of electrochemical interfaces, and a wealth of information has emerged from these ex situ studies on well-defined electrode surfaces.15"17 However, the fact that these techniques require the use of UHV precludes their use for in situ studies of the electrode/solution interface. In addition, transfer of the electrode from the electrolytic medium into UHV introduces the very serious question of whether the nature of the surface examined ex situ has the same structure as the surface in contact with the electrolyte and under potential control. Furthermore, any information on the solution side of the interface is, of necessity, lost. [Pg.266]

Such an electrochemical arrangement can also be used to transport oxygen from one electrode to the other by the imposition of an externally applied potential. This technique, known as coulometric titration , has been used to prepare flowing gas mixtures of oxygen/argon with a controlled oxygen partial pressure, to vary the non-stoichiometry of oxides, to study the thermodynamics of dilute oxygen solutions in metals, and to measure the kinetics of metal oxidation, as examples. [Pg.242]

After potential health hazards are identified and evaluated, the appropriate control techniques must be developed and installed. This requires the application of appropriate technology for reducing workplace exposures. [Pg.94]

Benefit/cost analysis demonstrated that solarization can also be more convenient than other control techniques, due to its lower costs (Yaron et al. 1991 Elmore 1991a Bell 1998 Esperancini et al. 2003 Hasing et al. 2004). Potential integration of this technique within more complex pest management strategies is another main advantage of soil solarization, as they are technically combinable with most other available control methods. [Pg.251]

The kinetics of CO oxidation from HClOi, solutions on the (100), (111) and (311) single crystal planes of platinum has been investigated. Electrochemical oxidation of CO involves a surface reaction between adsorbed CO molecules and a surface oxide of Pt. To determine the rate of this reaction the electrode was first covered by a monolayer of CO and subsequently exposed to anodic potentials at which Pt oxide is formed. Under these conditions the rate of CO oxidation is controlled by the rate of nucleation and growth of the oxide islands in the CO monolayer. By combination of the single and double potential step techniques the rates of the nucleation and the island growth have been determined independently. The results show that the rate of the two processes significantly depend on the crystallography of the Pt surfaces. [Pg.484]

Channel techniques employ rectangular ducts through which the electrolyte flows. The electrode is embedded into the wall [33]. Under suitable geometrical conditions [2] a parabolic velocity profile develops. Potential-controlled steady state (diffusion limiting conditions) and transient experiments are possible [34]. Similar to the Levich equation at the RDE, the diffusion limiting current is... [Pg.13]

Fairweather et al. [204] developed a microfluidic device and method to measure the capillary pressure as a function of fhe liquid water saturation for porous media wifh heferogeneous wetting properties during liquid and gas intrusions. In addition to being able to produce plots of capillary pressure as a function of liquid wafer safuration, their technique also allowed them to investigate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic pore volumes. This method is still in its early stages because the compression pressure and the temperatures were not controlled however, it can become a potential characterization technique that would permit further understanding of mass transport within the DL. [Pg.259]

The techniques used in studying interfaces can be classified in two categories in situ techniques and ex situ techniques. In situ methods are those where a surface is probed by one or several techniques while immersed in solution and under potential control. In contrast, in ex situ methods, an electrochemical experiment is first carried out. Then the electrode is removed from solution and examined by one or several spectroscopic techniques, which generally require ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) conditions. Figures 6.10 and 6.11 show some of the most common ex situ and in situ techniques applicable to the study of the metal/solution interface. [Pg.68]

Historically, the potential sweep technique and cyclic voltammetry were developed for analysis (as successors to polarography) and much of the theoretical development is concerned with the situation under conditions of diffusion control, for that is where the analytical applications are most readily made. In many of these approaches, the underlying assumption is that the electron transfer that must necessarily occur at the interface is a fast process and plays little part in determining the dependence of the observed current upon potential or upon the concentration of the reactant. However, these assumptions may not always apply. [Pg.709]


See other pages where Potential control technique is mentioned: [Pg.239]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.68]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.87 ]




SEARCH



Control techniques

Controlled potential

Potential Technique

Potential control

© 2024 chempedia.info