Electron transfer redox potential control

A transducer is selected with respect to the features of the biochemical reaction. In amme-tering transducers, constant potential applied to the reference electrode and the current generated in the redox transformation of the electrochemically active compound present on the enzymatic electrode surface is measured. Electron transfer rate is controlled by increasing or reducing the potential drop between electrodes. 

Important consequences result from the increase of the redox potential of metal clusters with their nuclearity. Indeed, independently of the metal, the smaller clusters are more sensitive to oxidation and can undergo corrosion even by mild oxidizing agents. Moreover, size-dependent redox properties explain the catalytic efficiency of colloidal particles during electron transfer processes. Their redox potentials control their role as electron relays the required potential being intermediate between the thresholds of the potentials of the donor (more negative) and of the acceptor (more positive). Catalytic properties of the nanoparticles are thus size-dependent. Haruta and co-workers reported that gold nanoparticles smaller than 5 nm have potential applications in catalysis as they are very active in... 

Importantly, and unlike potentiometry, voltammetric methods are dynamic and give information on kinetics, that is, rates of electron transfer and coupled (EC) reactions the latter include those in which electron transfer drives a reaction such as ion/proton transfer, or is gated , that is, the case in which the electron-transfer event is controlled by a preceding chemical process. Redox reactions can be quantified in both the potential and time domains, and these may be separated and resolved for example, steady-state catalytic studies of adsorbed enzymes reveal how catalytic electron transport varies as a function of potential, which can be important if the rate is sensitive to the oxidation state of a particular site in the molecule [1]. 

It is crucial that the redox potentials of enzymes that catalyze reactions involving electron transfer be rigidly controlled. 

Only three steps of the proposed mechanism (Fig. 18.20) could not be carried out individually under stoichiometric conditions. At pH 7 and the potential-dependent part of the catalytic wave (>150 mV vs. NHE), the —30 mV/pH dependence of the turnover frequency was observed for both Ee/Cu and Cu-free (Fe-only) forms of catalysts 2, and therefore it requires two reversible electron transfer steps prior to the turnover-determining step (TDS) and one proton transfer step either prior to the TDS or as the TDS. Under these conditions, the resting state of the catalyst was determined to be ferric-aqua/Cu which was in a rapid equilibrium with the fully reduced ferrous-aqua/Cu form (the Fe - and potentials were measured to be within < 20 mV of each other, as they are in cytochrome c oxidase, resulting in a two-electron redox equilibrium). This first redox equilibrium is biased toward the catalytically inactive fully oxidized state at potentials >0.1 V, and therefore it controls the molar fraction of the catalytically active metalloporphyrin. The fully reduced ferrous-aqua/Cu form is also in a rapid equilibrium with the catalytically active 5-coordinate ferrous porphyrin. As a result of these two equilibria, at 150 mV (vs. NHE), only <0.1%... 

The redox interaction with a co-reductant permits the formation of a reversible redox cycle for one-electron reduction as shown in Scheme 2. Furthermore, the function of transition metals is potentially and sterically controlled by ligands. A more efficient interaction between the orbitals of metals and substrates leads to facile electron transfer. Another interaction with an additive as a Lewis acid towards a substrate also contributes to such electron transfer. 

The so-called midpoint potential, Em, of protein-bound [Fe-S] clusters controls both the kinetics and thermodynamics of their reactions. Em may depend on the protein chain s polarity in the vicinity of the metal-sulfur cluster and also upon the bulk solvent accessibility at the site. It is known that nucleotide binding to nitrogenase s Fe-protein, for instance, results in a lowering of the redox potential of its [4Fe-4S] cluster by over 100 mV. This is thought to be essential for electron transfer to MoFe-protein for substrate reduction.11 3... 

If the potentials of the FDH-interfaced electrode are controlled to be more positive than the redox potential of PQQ (0.06 V), it is expected that the reduced form of FDH (FDH-PQQH2) will reoxidize to the active oxidized form (FDH-PQQ) by transferring two electrons to the electrode thus a continuous flow of anodic current is observed upon the addition of fructose. At a lower potential such as 0.1 V the background current was cathodic and magnitude was very high as the rest potential of the electrode is around 0.35 V. To make... 

In Fig.26, the energy correlation is schematically presented. The potential-controlled modulation of the molecular-interfaced enzymes may be interpreted by Fig.26. The enzyme and its substrate molecule have their intrinsic redox potentials. The redox potentials of oxidases and dehydrogenases are determined by an electron transferring molecule, i.e. a cofactor such as FAD, which is located at the active site of the enzyme. Due to potential gradient, an electron can be transferred from the substrate molecule to the active site of the enzyme, if the substrate molecule is accepted by the molecular space of the enzyme active site. However, the electron transfer between the active site of the enzyme and the electrode is regulated by the electrode potential, even if the molecule wire could be completed. It should be reasonable that the enzyme activity is electrically modulated at a threshold of the redox potential of the enzyme. 

Figure 2.29. If the intrinsic barrier for electron transfer is small, the potential range within which the activation control prevails is accordingly narrow and the corresponding asymptote is approximately linear, as represented in the figure, where ks is the standard rate constant (i.e., the rate constant at zero driving force). Under these conditions, redox catalysts that offer a small driving force resulting in counter-diffusion control can be found. This behavior is identified by the value of the slope (F/TIT In 10). The intersection of the counter-diffusion and the diffusion asymptotes provides the value of the standard potential sought, , B.

Because of the precise control of the redox steps by means of the electrode potential and the facile measurement of the kinetics through the current, the electrochemical approach to. S rn I reactions is particularly well suited to assessing the validity of the. S rn I mechanism and identifying the side reactions (termination steps of the chain process). It also allows full kinetic characterization of the reaction sequence. The two key steps of the reaction are the cleavage of the initial anion radical, ArX -, and conversely, formation of the product anion radical, ArNu -. Modeling these reactions as concerted intramolecular electron transfer/bond-breaking and bond-forming processes, respectively, allows the establishment of reactivity-structure relationships as shown in Section 3.5. 

In this review, wherever electrochemistry is concerned, the reversibility of a reaction refers firstly to the chemical reversibility. It also requires that the electron transfer reaction occurs at such a rate that the rate of the whole electrodic process, which is measured by the output current of the electrode, is controlled by the diffusion of the redox species towards the electrode surface. Furthermore, the surface concentrations of O and R at a given potential should be governed by the Nemst equation. 

As mentioned in the introduction to controlled potential electrolysis (Section 2.3), there are various indirect methods to calculate the number of electrons transferred in a redox process. One method which can be rapidly carried out, but can only be used for electrochemically reversible processes (or for processes not complicated by chemical reactions), compares the cyclic voltammetric response exhibited by a species with its chronoamperometric response obtained under the same experimental conditions.23 This is based on the fact that in cyclic voltammetry the peak current is given by the Randles-Sevcik equation ... 

---