Controlled potential boundary conditions

Potential-step teclmiques can be used to study a variety of types of coupled chemical reactions. In these cases the experiment is perfomied under diffrision control, and each system is solved with the appropriate initial and boundary conditions. 

As reversible ion transfer reactions are diffusion controlled, the mass transport to the interface is given by Fick s second law, which may be directly integrated with the Nernst equation as a boundary condition (see, for instance. Ref. 230 232). A solution for the interfacial concentrations may be obtained, and the maximum forward peak may then be expressed as a function of the interfacial area A, of the potential scan rate v, of the bulk concentration of the ion under study Cj and of its diffusion coefficient D". This leads to the Randles Sevcik equation [233] ... 

The analytical solution of the Smoluchowski equation for a Coulomb potential has been found by Hong and Noolandi [13]. Their results of the pair survival probability, obtained for the boundary condition (11a) with R = 0, are presented in Fig. 2. The solid lines show W t) calculated for two different values of Yq. The horizontal axis has a unit of r /D, which characterizes the timescale of the kinetics of geminate recombination in a particular system For example, in nonpolar liquids at room temperature r /Z) 10 sec. Unfortunately, the analytical treatment presented by Hong and Noolandi [13] is rather complicated and inconvenient for practical use. Tabulated values of W t) can be found in Ref. 14. The pair survival probability of geminate ion pairs can also be calculated numerically [15]. In some cases, numerical methods may be a more convenient approach to calculate W f), especially when the reaction cannot be assumed as totally diffusion-controlled. 

Equations (18-20) are discretized by the control volume method53 and solved numerically to obtain distributions of species (H2, 02, and N2) concentration, phase potential (solid and electrolyte), and the current resulting from each electrode reaction, in particular, carbon corrosion and oxygen evolution currents at the cathode catalyst layer, with the following initial and boundary conditions ... 

Here, q is the inverse of a screening length related to the valence electron density which contributes to the screening and /u. is a Lagrange multiplier controlling the total number of particles. The boundary conditions to be used with Equation (23) are that V(r) must match Vc r) at Rs and that rV(r) -> -1 as r -> 0. Once we have solved the Thomas-Fermi equation, we have calculated the screened function, defined as the bare impurity potential divided to the screened one, namely Vb/V. 

In Chap. 5, the two-species cases were described for the explicit method. Here we add those for the implicit case. Both Dirichiet and derivative boundary conditions are of interest, the latter both with controlled current or quasire-versible and systems under controlled potential. 

Under the assumption that the concentrations are uniform within the electrolyte, potential is governed by Laplace s equation (5.52). Under these conditions, the passage of current through the system is controlled by the Ohmic resistance to passage of current through the electrolyte and by the resistance associated with reaction kinetics. The primary distribution applies in the limit that the Ohmic resistance dominates and kinetic limitations can be neglected. The solution adjacent to the electrode can then be considered to be an equipotential surface with value o- The boundary condition for insulating surfaces is that the current density is equal to zero. 

The MD calculation to study supercritical fluid extraction from ceramics was performed with the XDORTO program developed by Kawamura[12]. The Verlet algorithm was used for the calculation of atomic motions, while the Ewald method was applied to the calculation of electrostatic interactions. Temperature was controlled by means of scaling the atom velocities under 3-dimensional periodic boundary condition. The calculations were made for 40000 time steps with the time increment of 2.5 10 seconds. The two body central force interaction potential, as shown in equation (3) was used for all the calculations ... 

If charge diffusion is significantly slower so that the distance of charge transport, L, (=2(Dt) ) is clearly smaller than the thickness of the lamina, 5, the electrochemical response will be equivalent to that recorded when reactants freely diffuse from an infinite volume of solution to the electrode. This situation, often termed as thick-layer behavior, corresponds to semi-infinite boundary conditions, and concentration profiles such as that shown in Figure 2.5c are then predicted. Accordingly, Cottrell-type behavior is observed, for instance, in cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronoamperometry (CA). In this last technique, a constant potential sufficiently cathodic for ensuring diffusion control in the reduction of Ox to Red is applied. The resulting current-time (i-t) curves should verify the Cottrell equation presented in the previous chapter (Equation (1.3)). 

In the case of a diffusion-controlled reaction a current-potential curve can be evaluated quantitatively. The diffusion equation has to be solved again by using time-dependent boundary conditions. The mathematics, however, are very complicated and cannot be shown here. They end up with an integral equation which has to be solved numerically [11]. The peak current, /p, for a diffusion-controlled process (reversible reaction) is found to be... 

We consider here a situation where the mass transport of the electroactive species may become rate determining, but all other processes which control the current-potential characteristics can still adjust rapidly. Thus, the concentration of the electroactive species, c, becomes time dependent. Since we allow only for diffusion, its temporal evolution is given by Pick s second law [i.e., in the case of a planar electrode, by dc/dt = D (d c/dz with the diffusion coefficient D, and z the spatial coordinate perpendicular to the electrode]. At the electrode (z = WE), the concentration obeys Pick s fust law, (dc/dz) z=we = Kuc i F). At a certain distance from the electrode, it is assumed that the concentration is at a constant value, c, its bulk value (constituting the second boundary condition). The concept of the Nemst diffusion layer underlies this idea. 

Secondary current distribution [85, 86], Here, mass transfer effects are not controlling, bnt reaction kinetics are considered because of a non-negligible electrode polarization (i.e., electrode reactions that require an appreciable surface overpotential to sustain a high reaction rate). Once again, Laplace s Equation (Equation [26.120]) is solved for the potential distribution, but the boundary condition for O on the electrode surface (y = 0) is given by... 

Hence, when the control parameter / increases to such a value that the ratio l/R = X exceeds the critical value 1.3255, then the boundary conditions (3.2c) will not be met and the function (3.2b) ceases to be a solution for the minimum surface (minimum of the potential energy). The critical value of a is a = / /1.8102. 

Additional boundary conditions usually relate to concentrations or concentration gradients at the electrode surface. For example, if the potential is controlled in an experiment, one might have... 

This boundary condition involving the concentration gradient allows the diffusion problem to be solved without reference to the rate of the electron-transfer reaction, in contrast with the concentration-potential boundary conditions required for controlled-potential methods. Although in many controlled-current experiments the applied current is constant, the more general case for any arbitrarily applied current, i t), can be solved readily and includes the constant-current case, as well as reversal experiments and several others of interest. 

The advantages of using a mass transfer system to simulate a heat transfer system include the potential for improved accuracy of measurement and control of boundary conditions. For example, electric current and mass changes can generally be measured with greater accuracy than heat flux. Also, while adiabatic walls are an ideal that, at best, we can only approach, impermeable walls are an everyday reality. Thus, mass transfer systems are gaining popularity in precision experimental studies. 

---