Control contractors

Safety should be completely in the hands of the contractor controlling the site, unless the client is in occupation. Keep a high profile in dealings on safety matters, and ensure that staff and any other parties are conscious of the need for safety. 

The site was very security conscious due to the nature of the chemicals being stored. A vigorous program aimed at ensuring contractor control was well established and was observed to he working well during the week. 

As the name implies the company basically rents the rig and crew on a per day basis. Usually the oil company also manages the drilling operation and has full control over the drilling process. This type of contract actually encourages the contractor to spend as much time as acceptable on location . With increased cost consciousness, day rate contracts have become less favoured by most oil companies. 

The choice of contract type will depend upon the type of work, and the level of control which the oil company wishes to maintain. There is a current trend for the oil company to consider the contractor as a partner in the project (partnering arrangements), and to work closely with the contractor at all stages of the project development. The objective of this closer involvement of the contractor is to provide a common incentive for the contractor and the oil company to improve quality, efficiency, safety, and most importantly to reduce cost. This type of contract usually contains a significant element of sharing risk and reward of the project. 

Improvements in the abiUty to control operating conditions and in contractor designs have allowed a steady reduction in the number of purification steps required. The THORP faciUty, commissioned as of 1994 in the U.K., uses only a single purification step. 

J. L. Anastasi and co-workers, 5th Annual Coal Preparation, Utilisyation and Environmental Control Contractors Conference, U.S. Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, Pa., July 31—Aug. 3, 1989. 

The economics seem to be better for systems where dry powdered fresh hme plus ground recycled hme is injected along with a relatively coarse spray which impinges on and dries out from the reagent, as described by Stouffer et al. [Hs EC Res., 28(1) 20 (1989)]. Witnum et al. [9th Ann. Pitt. Coal Prep. Util. Euv. Control Contractors Conf. (1993)] describes an advanced version of that system that has been further optimized to the point that it is competitive with wet hme-stone scrubbing for >90 percent flue gas desirffurization. 

Seller is an independent contractor, with all the attendant rights and liabilities, and not an agent or employee of [insert company name]. Any provision in this Agreement, or any action by [insert company name], which may appear to give [insert company name] the right to direct or control Seller in providing Prodnct means Seller will follow the desires of [insert company name] in resnlts only. 

Operating costs are best done in-house, because company personnel are familiar with corporate philosophies of staffing, maintenance, control laboratory operations. administrative requirements, and many other support aspects of running the business. If adequately staffed, the in-house study group should handle operating costs rather than try to teach a contractor company requirements. 

Contractors Clearance Certificate control of contractors/temporary workers Close control of temporary heating, lighting, cooking etc. 

Chemical manufactunng personal protective equipment Chemical manufactunng controlling contractors Are you complying with COSHH ... 

Oversee activities of staff, tenants, contractors, and other building occupants that impact indoor air quality smoking, housekeeping, building maintenance, shipping and receiving, pest control, food preparation, and other special uses. 

The team should have a wide range of knowledge and experience. If a contractor designs the plant, then the HAZOP team should include people from both tlie contractor and client organizations. On a computer-controlled batch plant, the software engineer should be a member of the HAZOP team, which should include at least one other person who understands the computer logic. 

Successful project control includes understanding and anticipating organizational issues that may occur with contractors and subcontractors. Once the contractor relationship is formalized, it is then communicated to all affected personnel on the site. 

Contractors and subcontractors are typically required by contract to be responsible for their own workers and should provide a level of oversight to meet all specifications. The primary contractor who is responsible for the worksite typically establishes the minimum requirements, controls access to the worksite, and verifies that subcontractors fulfill their health and safety duties and responsibilities. Wlien these specifications are defined, all contractors and subcontractors should meet or exceed these requirements, as appropriate. This could be based on the nature of the assigned tasks and associated hazards [2]. 

No matter if subcontractors are working for a general or main contractor or working directly for the client, when two or more prime contractors conduct activities at the same worksite, it is prudent that a common basis for health and safety rules and controls be established. Wlien one contractor performs an intrusive activity that increases the hazard level for all workers at a worksite, that information should be communicated to other contractors to permit them to plan and control their activities accordingly. 

To maintain adeqnate site control, the site safety and health snpervi-sor mnst have the anthority to enforce the SSAHP s rnles on any individ-nal present at the site, whether that individnal is an employee or an ontside contractor. If there is more than one SSAHP (i.e., if each contractor develops its own), OSHA considers it essential that the plans he integrated and enforced consistently to ensnre that on-site personnel have a clear nnder-standing of safety and health expectations, lines of anthority, and emergency response actions. 

Requirements for written safety and health SOPs are found in paragraphs (b)(4)(I) of the HAZWOPER standard. None of the sites audited had developed comprehensive, site-specific SOPs that specify the controls necessary to complete each task. The contractor s SSAHP at Site B did discuss generic task-related hazards and SOPs however, the task-specific SOPs lacked detail. Eor example, the SOPs did not specifically identify the site locations where hazards were likely to occur, nor did they specify the appropriate types of controls. 

The contractor s SSAHP for Site C contained task- and operation-specific hazard analyses and safety and health procedures that covered general operations, but they were not specific enough for prescribing control methods and PPE for each job task. The plan identified some safety hazards for each operation but did not describe SOPs for protecting employees from these hazards. The SSAHP did, however, contain personnel and equipment decontamination procedures used at the site. 

Site H was the only site at which the contractor had implemented comprehensive and effective site control elements. The Site H contractor had established site work zones, a buddy system, and site communication procedures consistent with 1910.120(d). This contractor had also established exclusion zones and contamination reduction zones to control migration of site contaminants to clean areas of the site when work within these areas introduced the potential for exposure to hazardous contaminants. The audit team supported this contractor s use of flexible and temporary work zone boundaries based on monitoring results and hazard determinations. 

The contractor s site control elements at Site B were not comprehensive however, the contractor s SSAHP did address site entry and training requirements and mandated that all personnel, including subcontractors and visitors entering the exclusion zone or decontamination zone, meet HAZWOPER training requirements. 

Forty-hour training was required for personnel entering the exclusion zone, and additional supervisory training was required for site supervisors. Site control procedures described in the Site C contractor s SSAHP included maintenance of site control logs at each access point, use of red tape or chainlink fencing to demarcate hot zones, and use of the buddy system in all exclusion and contamination reduction zone areas. Site communications relied almost exclusively on visual sighting of employees the plan did not describe the use of two-way radios. This suggested that all employees in hot zones can be observed continuously from the support zones. 

The primary contractor at Site A had identified clean zones, buffer zones, and related site control procedures in its written plan however, onsite implementation differed from those specified in the plan. For example, the exclusion zones identified in the plan at the upper pad of the wastewater treatment plant, the dredge area, and the solid waste storage area were marked with signs requiring PPE, but were not labeled with red banners as called for in the plan. In addition, the exclusion zones did not have controlled access through one point of entry as described in the plan, nor were the buffer zones established and demarcated with yellow banners. 

Contractor/snbcontractor A party in either the prime or subcontractor role, or otherwise providing goods or services to the organization, who performs some of the obligations of a particular prime contract. For example, a contractor hired to put up temporary fencing around a work area to control access would be a subcontractor who must be prequalified. 

Ensure that the contractor/subcontractor can implement a comprehensive health and safety program in compliance with applicable regulations, including accident prevention programs, medical surveillance, training, work practice controls, use of personal protective equipment, and so on. 

---