Consumer exposure estimates pesticides

One common objective of an LSMBS is to refine the estimates of actual exposure of consumers to ingredients or impurities in one or more products. For example, study results might be intended to determine a realistic human dietary exposure to pesticide residues in fresh fruits and vegetables. The advent of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) has produced an enhanced focus on the exposure of children to pesticides. A well-designed and implemented LSMBS would afford the opportunity to delineate better the exposure and risk to children and other population subgroups. The LSMBS would provide consumer-level data at or near the point of consumption, allowing the refined, relevant, and realistic assessments of dietary exposure. 

The exposure of humans to pesticides from residues In food is dependent both on the quantity of a food consumed and the residue levels therein. The Agency has traditionally used a simplified method of estimating chronic exposure to pesticide residues that was originally developed by the Food and Drug Administration. This exposure method is based on the assumptions of tolerance level residues in food and national average food consumption per capita. 

At the present time, most US pesticide tolerances were established prior to the passage of FQPA. In assessing consumer risk from exposure to pesticides, the EPA first estimates consumer exposure. The maximum legal exposure to the pesticide is usually first calculated by assuming that... 

Dietary exposure to pesticides (or to xenobiotics in general) is determined by calculating the product of the amount of chemical in or on the food and the total quantity of food consumed. The quantity of chemical potentially consumed in foods can be estimated from data obtained from residue field trials, metabolism studies, and/or monitoring data. Information from these sources is then analyzed with one of several available models containing food consumption factors from surveys conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). For calculation of... 

Decisions taken by regulators have important economical consequences for the industry that manufactures pesticides, the farmers, the workers and the consumers. Such consequences, justify the need for regulators to have well supported data related to the four steps of the risk assessment process. Risk assessment requires a robust analytical basis studies addressed either to hazard identification or exposure estimation. Both have to be conducted under good laboratory practice (GLP) certification [6]. This paper deals with the key points of hazard identification and exposure assessment, both aspects highly influenced by the solubility and physical-chemical properties of pesticides. 

The estimation of the Actual Daily Exposure assuming a person consumes a large portion of food. If this one-day exposure exceeds the Acceptable Daily Intake, then this use of the pesticide could be denied. 

Use of estimates on the percentage of a crop that is treated with a pesticide. Although this would not influence the level of exposure to persons consuming treated commodities, it would influence the estimate of the number of persons exposed. 

Different methods of human exposure assessment vary with respect to the input data or information required and the degree of uncertainty associated with resulting estimates. Eor example, the film-thickness approach to dermal exposure assessment is a screening-level methodology that assumes a uniform layer of material (e.g., a liquid consumer product) is on the skin, and that a portion of the material in this layer is absorbed, per the dermal absorption characteristics of the chemical. In contrast, dermal exposure assessment and percutaneous absorption methods can include metrics that account for time-dependent exposure and absorption processes. Eor example, in the case of secondary dermal contact with chemicals on surfaces (e.g., transfer of pesticide residues from... 

Estimates of pesticide intake need to be made to compare potential consumer dietary exposure with acceptable dietary intakes derived from toxicological studies. At its most basic level, if estimates of long- and short-term intake are less than... 

Each day humans come into contact with thousands of chemicals presented in a multitude of consumer products and some of these products contain pesticides. Exposure takes place through occupational activity, through contact in the environment and by ingestion of food and water. This exposure is of great concern to governments who wish to estimate health risks to the general public and to workers. 

An acute tolerance (MRL) assessment is routinely conducted by DPR to ensure that this level of residue will not result in adverse effects in consumers of treated commodities. It is the maximum amount of a pesticide residue dut is legally allowed on that commodity (14). By definition, the use of tolerance residue levels means that a point estimate, deterministic approach was used. DPR considers that acute, but not chronic, tolerance assessment is appropriate because it is highly improbable that an individual would consume a commodity with tolerance level residues on a chronic, annual basis. Similarly, it is considered by DPR to be inappropriate to use a percent crop-treated (%CT) adjustment on the tolerance assessment, whenever using a deterministic approach (Table VI). These tolerance assessments determined the MOS values at the 95 percentile of exposure. 

Information on the effects that cause an increase or decrease in levels of pesticide residues in food raw materials and the final products are very important, because in estimating health risks from dietary exposure to residues of pesticides, it is necessary to consider the form in which the given food is consumed. In most cases, technological and culinary processes lead to a reduction, and often to the complete removal, of pesticide residues. 

---