Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conductive porous structures

Conductive Porous Structures Made with the Ziegler-Natta Catalyst... [Pg.441]

Conductive Porous Structures and Films Made with the Luttinger... [Pg.443]

The conduction through residual gases can be reduced by the application of porous structures. The convection within a single pore is minimal if pore sizes are small. In small pores the temperature difference at the walls of the pore are negligible and no convection occurs. The convection is further reduced by the evacuation of the thermal insulating material. [Pg.587]

Temperature gradients within the porous catalyst could not be very large, due to the low concentration of combustibles in the exhaust gas. Assuming a concentration of 5% CO, a diffusion coefficient in the porous structure of 0.01 cms/sec, and a thermal conductivity of 4 X 10-4 caI/sec°C cm, one can calculate a Prater temperature of 1.0°C—the maximum possible temperature gradient in the porous structure (107). The simultaneous heat and mass diffusion is not likely to lead to multiple steady states and instability, since the value of the 0 parameter in the Weisz and Hicks theory would be much less than 0.02 (108). [Pg.100]

Most of the models developed to describe the electrochemical behavior of the conducting polymers attempt an approach through porous structure, percolation thresholds between oxidized and reduced regions, and changes of phases, including nucleation processes, etc. (see Refs. 93, 94, 176, 177, and references therein). Most of them have been successful in describing some specific behavior of the system, but they fail when the... [Pg.372]

Thermal property is another critical property for furnace slag. Because of their more porous structure, blast furnace slag aggregates have lower thermal conductivities than conventional aggregates. Their insulating value is of particular advantage in applications such as frost tapers (transition treatments in pavement subgrades between frost-susceptible and nonfrost-susceptible soils) or pavement base courses over frost-susceptible soils. [Pg.174]

Apart from recapture of the injected electrons by the oxidized dye, there are additional loss channels in dye-sensitized solar cells, which involve reduction of triiodide ions in the electrolyte, resulting in dark currents. The Ti02 layer is an interconnected network of nanoparticles with a porous structure. The functionalized dyes penetrate through the porous network and adsorb over Ti02 the surface. However, if the pore size is too small for the dye to penetrate, that part of the surface may still be exposed to the redox mediator whose size is smaller than the dye. Under these circumstances, the redox mediator can collect the injected electron from the Ti02 conduction band, resulting in a dark current (Equation (6)), which can be measured from intensity-modulated experiments and the dark current of the photovoltaic cell. Such dark currents reduce the maximum cell voltage obtainable, and thereby the total efficiency. [Pg.747]

The atomic structure of a heterogeneous catalyst determines its chemical and phase properties, but texture determines a wide range of additional features that dictate such characteristics as adsorption and capillarity, permeability, mechanical strength, heat and electrical conductivity, etc. For example, the apparent catalytic activity,. of a grain, taking into account diffusion of reagents, depends on the interrelation between the rates of reaction and diffusion, and the latter is determined by a porous structure. [Pg.260]

The conductivity of porous structures depends on the size of the conducting filaments making up the silicon skeleton [An5] and will therefore be discussed for each of the three size regimes separately. [Pg.121]

Two main types of catalyst layers are used in PEM fuel cells polyfefrafluo-roethylene (PTFE)-bound catalyst layers and thin-film catalyst layers [3]. The PTFE-bound CL is the earlier version, used mainly before 1990. If confains two components hydrophobic PTFE and Pt black catalyst or carbon-supported Pt catalyst. The PTFE acts as a binder holding the catalyst together to form a hydrophobic and structured porous matrix catalyst layer. This porous structure can simultaneously provide passages for reacfanf gas fransport to the catalyst surface and for wafer removal from fhe cafalysf layer. In fhe CL, the catalyst acts as both the reaction site and a medium for electron conduction. In the case of carbon-supported Pt catalysts, both carbon support and catalyst can act as electron conductors, but only Pt acts as the reaction site. [Pg.64]

The challenge for modeling the water balance in CCL is to link the composite, porous morphology properly with liquid water accumulation, transport phenomena, electrochemical kinetics, and performance. At the materials level, this task requires relations between composihon, porous structure, liquid water accumulation, and effective properhes. Relevant properties include proton conductivity, gas diffusivihes, liquid permeability, electrochemical source term, and vaporizahon source term. Discussions of functional relationships between effective properties and structure can be found in fhe liferafure. Because fhe liquid wafer saturation, 5,(2)/ is a spatially varying function at/o > 0, these effective properties also vary spatially in an operating cell, warranting a self-consistent solution for effective properties and performance. [Pg.415]

Activation is often conducted by processing with steam or chemical agents. Carbons activated by steam can be prepared from raw materials such as coal, peat, or lignite, which are carbonized and reacted with high-temperature water steam, in the process where fraction of carbon atoms are gasified, leaving beside porous structure. Chemically, carbon can also be activated with phosphoric acid. So-called mesocarbon microbeads (MCMBs) were produced from coal tar pitch in the Osaka... [Pg.303]

In addition to the criticisms from Anderman, a further challenge to the application of SPEs comes from their interfacial contact with the electrode materials, which presents a far more severe problem to the ion transport than the bulk ion conduction does. In liquid electrolytes, the electrodes are well wetted and soaked, so that the electrode/electrolyte interface is well extended into the porosity structure of the electrode hence, the ion path is little affected by the tortuosity of the electrode materials. However, the solid nature of the polymer would make it impossible to fill these voids with SPEs that would have been accessible to the liquid electrolytes, even if the polymer film is cast on the electrode surface from a solution. Hence, the actual area of the interface could be close to the geometric area of the electrode, that is, only a fraction of the actual surface area. The high interfacial impedance frequently encountered in the electrochemical characterization of SPEs should originate at least partially from this reduced surface contact between electrode and electrolyte. Since the porous structure is present in both electrodes in a lithium ion cell, the effect of interfacial impedances associated with SPEs would become more pronounced as compared with the case of lithium cells in which only the cathode material is porous. [Pg.168]

For the detailed study of reaction-transport interactions in the porous catalytic layer, the spatially 3D model computer-reconstructed washcoat section can be employed (Koci et al., 2006, 2007a). The structure of porous catalyst support is controlled in the course of washcoat preparation on two levels (i) the level of macropores, influenced by mixing of wet supporting material particles with different sizes followed by specific thermal treatment and (ii) the level of meso-/ micropores, determined by the internal nanostructure of the used materials (e.g. alumina, zeolites) and sizes of noble metal crystallites. Information about the porous structure (pore size distribution, typical sizes of particles, etc.) on the micro- and nanoscale levels can be obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy ( ), or other high-resolution imaging techniques in combination with mercury porosimetry and BET adsorption isotherm data. This information can be used in computer reconstruction of porous catalytic medium. In the reconstructed catalyst, transport (diffusion, permeation, heat conduction) and combined reaction-transport processes can be simulated on detailed level (Kosek et al., 2005). [Pg.121]

In recent years investigations were begun in which the variation of adsorbent properties, such as electrical conductivity (1, 2), dielectric permeability (3-5), and linear sizes (6-11), were studied. In these systems the adsorbents were usually active carbons and porous glasses. Only a few studies were carried out on zeolites these studies are interesting because of the perfect porous structures (12-14) of zeolites. All these studies showed that during adsorption the properties of adsorbents do not remain constant. [Pg.403]

Most battery electrodes are porous structures in which an interconnected matrix of solid particles, consisting of both nonconductive and electronically conductive materials, is filled with electrolyte. When the active mass is nonconducting, conductive materials, usually carbon or metallic powders, are added to provide electronic contact to the active mass. The solids occupy 50% to 70% of the volume of a typical poious battery electiode. Most battery electrode structures do not have a well-defined planar surface but have a complex surface extending throughout the volume of the porous electrode Macroscopically, the porous electrode behaves as a homogeneous unit. [Pg.178]

Due to the porous structure of the electrodes, the electrical and ionic conductivities are different from those of the dense materials, and are strongly dependent on the porosity. Pores, in fact, can be considered as having infinite resistivity, thus they reduce the overall conductivity. For Ni-based anodes, assuming nickel particles as spherical, Zhao and Virkar [36] proposed the following formula ... [Pg.63]

Where A, is the effective heat conductivity of the catalyst particle and (-AHt) the heat effect of reaction i. The effective conductivity is the quantity which (when multiplied by the gradient of temperature) yields the true rate of energy transport in the porous structure of the solid. [Pg.56]


See other pages where Conductive porous structures is mentioned: [Pg.219]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.519]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.536]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.493]    [Pg.19]   


SEARCH



Porous structure

© 2024 chempedia.info