Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion into account

Schutz s correlation for free convection at a sphere, Eq. (25) in Table VII, takes pure diffusion into account by means of the constant term Sh = 2. According to his measurements using local spot electrodes, the flow here is not laminar but already in transition to turbulence. [Pg.264]

As the pore size decreases, molecules collide more often with the pore walls than with each other. This movement, intermediated by these molecule—pore-wall interactions, is known as Knudsen diffusion. Some models have begun to take this form of diffusion into account. In this type of diffusion, the diffusion coefficient is a direct function of the pore radius. In the models, Knudsen diffusion and Stefan—Maxwell diffusion are treated as mass-transport resistances in seriesand are combined to yield... [Pg.457]

For quantitative interpretation of cross-relaxation spectra in the spin-diffusion regimes it is necessary to take spin diffusion into account. From the mathematical point of view, this means that the Taylor series in eq. (36) must be used without truncation. In other words, the basic formula, eq. (8), must be used and the full spectral matrix must be analyzed. [Pg.294]

The movement of macromolecules in a temperature gradient is always in the direction from the hot to the cold region [43,197]. This movement is caused by thermal diffusion, exploited as the driving force in Th-FFF, and called the Soret effect, known already for over 50 years [201-203]. The transport (Eq. (1)) has to be extended by a term taking the thermal diffusion into account. Thus the flux density Jx can be expressed by [34,194] ... [Pg.111]

A simple fit of the data with the product of an exponential association and an exponential decay to estimate the escape depth, overestimates the escape depth by folding the positron implantation profile and diffusion into the fitting parameters [30], A more appropriate numerical fitting method based on the diffusion equation was used to take both the implantation profile and diffusion into account [31]. When it is applied to the 3-to-2 photon ratio data suitable absorbing boundary conditions need to be included. The results for the escape depth are shown in Figure 7.8 [30]. In addition to the diffusionlike motion of positronium in connected pores, positrons and positronium diffuse to the pores. [Pg.177]

There are several models to describe intracrystalline diffusion (step 3) in microporous media. Diffusion in zeolites is extensively described in Ref. 30. For the modeling of permeation through zeolitic membranes, such a model should take the concentration dependence of zeolitic diffusion into account. Moreover, it should be easy applicable to multicomponent systems. In Section III.C, several models will be discussed. [Pg.551]

An alternative method to take surface diffusion into account consists in lumping pore diffusion and concentration-dependent surface diffusion together, thus creating an apparent effective diffusion coefficient, which is concentration dependent. This approach was used by Ma et al [53], by Pigtkowski et al. [28] and by Zhou et al. [10]. This method is also an approximation, but it is still an improvement over the simpler HSDM model. [Pg.765]

At the exit, the (mass) polymer concentration is measured automatically, and simultaneously, the corresponding elution volume is continuously registered. In this way, one obtains a chromatogram (see Fig. 1.16) which defines the polydispersion of the sample under study. However, to determine the polydispersion curve with precision, from the chromatogram, it is necessary to take the axial diffusion into account. [Pg.36]

The physics of ILs at surfaces are important for a deeper understanding of the resulting properties and enables the design of appHcations. Each combination of cation and anion can lead to a different behavior on surfaces of sohds, because the molecular structure of each IL has a strong influence of the formation of layers at the interfaces. In aqueous electrolytes the Hehnholtz-model and its further developments are describing the physics in a sufficient way The Gouy-Chapman-model takes the diffusion into account, and the Stem-model combines the formation of a double layer with diffusion. Compared to aqueous solutions of salts, the situation in ILs is different The ions have no solvent environment Their next neighbors are also ions. As a consequence the physics at the interfaces between sohds and ILs cannot be described by the common models. [Pg.446]

The experimental use of flame theory is a simpler problem because the measured profiles allow the replacement of the coupled differential equations with a pointwise set of algebraic equations. For example, to determine the rate of appearance (or disappearance) of a particular species at various points (i.e., at various temperatures in the flame) requires a knowledge of the first and second derivatives of the composition of a species and the temperature and gas velocity at the point in question. These are experimental quantities available from the flame structure measurements (see, e.g.. Fig. 8). The usual method of data reduction involves two steps (1) the calculation of the species flux [Eq. (2)] (i.e., the amount of the species passing through a unit area per unit time)—this takes the effect of diffusion into account quantitatively (2) from this flux curve the rate of species production is obtained by differentiation [Eq. (3)]. [Pg.74]

Most recently we have devised a method of taking surface diffusion into account explicitly and obtaining the surface diffusion coefficient from the data. Thus we will no longer need to rely on the plots used here to infer the presence or absence of significant surface diffusion. [Pg.348]

Fig. 3.12 Ratio of the hydrodynamic radius Rh to (in our notation), plotted versus Here the hydrodynamic radius is not defined as a purely geometric quantity, but rather as the Stokes radius of a sphere which would have the same sedimentation velocity as the polymer. The latter is obtained via static dynamics , also taking rotational diffusion into account (Zimm s approach. ). Data are shown for star polymers on the cubic lattice and/= 1,3,4,6 (from top to bottom) for different effective monomeric Stokes radii a = 1/4 (full symbols) and 0=1/2 (open symbols) (from Ref. 106). Fig. 3.12 Ratio of the hydrodynamic radius Rh to (in our notation), plotted versus Here the hydrodynamic radius is not defined as a purely geometric quantity, but rather as the Stokes radius of a sphere which would have the same sedimentation velocity as the polymer. The latter is obtained via static dynamics , also taking rotational diffusion into account (Zimm s approach. ). Data are shown for star polymers on the cubic lattice and/= 1,3,4,6 (from top to bottom) for different effective monomeric Stokes radii a = 1/4 (full symbols) and 0=1/2 (open symbols) (from Ref. 106).
Corrections to the MP4/6-311G(d,b) Energy. Higher-level basis functions, if they are prudently chosen, should be better than lower-level functions. Thus the energy of, for example, a diffuse function, [MP2/6-311 - - G(d,p)] should be lower (more negative) than the same function in which diffuse electron density is not taken into account [MP2/6-31 lG(d,p)], provided that the levels of elecUon... [Pg.313]

Aside from the side chains, the movement of the backbone along the main reptation tube is still given by Eq. (2.67). With the side chains taken into account, the diffusion velocity must be decreased by multiplying by the probability of the side-chain relocation. Since the diffusion velocity is inversely proportional to r, Eq. (2.67) must be divided by Eq. (2.69) to give the relaxation time for a chain of degree of polymerization n carrying side chains of degree of polymerization n ... [Pg.125]

Fig. 12. Comparison of actual and predicted charging rates for 0.3-pm particles in a corona field of 2.65 kV/cm (141). The finite approximation theory (173) which gives the closest approach to experimental data takes into account both field charging and diffusion charging mechanisms. The curve labeled White (141) predicts charging rate based only on field charging and that marked Arendt and Kallmann (174) shows charging rate based only on diffusion. Fig. 12. Comparison of actual and predicted charging rates for 0.3-pm particles in a corona field of 2.65 kV/cm (141). The finite approximation theory (173) which gives the closest approach to experimental data takes into account both field charging and diffusion charging mechanisms. The curve labeled White (141) predicts charging rate based only on field charging and that marked Arendt and Kallmann (174) shows charging rate based only on diffusion.
Eabrication techniques must take into account the metallurgical properties of the metals to be joined and the possibiUty of undesirable diffusion at the interface during hot forming, heat treating, and welding. Compatible alloys, ie, those that do not form intermetaUic compounds upon alloying, eg, nickel and nickel alloys (qv), copper and copper alloys (qv), and stainless steel alloys clad to steel, may be treated by the traditional techniques developed for clads produced by other processes. On the other hand, incompatible combinations, eg, titanium, zirconium, or aluminum to steel, require special techniques designed to limit the production at the interface of undesirable intermetaUics which would jeopardize bond ductihty. [Pg.148]

When it was recognized (31) that the SD model does not explain the negative solute rejections found for some organics, the extended solution—diffusion model was formulated. The SD model does not take into account possible pressure dependence of the solute chemical potential which, although negligible for inorganic salt solutions, can be important for organic solutes (28,29). [Pg.147]

Early models used a value for that remained constant throughout the day. However, measurements show that the deposition velocity increases during the day as surface heating increases atmospheric turbulence and hence diffusion, and plant stomatal activity increases (50—52). More recent models take this variation of into account. In one approach, the first step is to estimate the upper limit for in terms of the transport processes alone. This value is then modified to account for surface interaction, because the earth s surface is not a perfect sink for all pollutants. This method has led to what is referred to as the resistance model (52,53) that represents as the analogue of an electrical conductance... [Pg.382]

The physics and modeling of turbulent flows are affected by combustion through the production of density variations, buoyancy effects, dilation due to heat release, molecular transport, and instabiUty (1,2,3,5,8). Consequently, the conservation equations need to be modified to take these effects into account. This modification is achieved by the use of statistical quantities in the conservation equations. For example, because of the variations and fluctuations in the density that occur in turbulent combustion flows, density weighted mean values, or Favre mean values, are used for velocity components, mass fractions, enthalpy, and temperature. The turbulent diffusion flame can also be treated in terms of a probabiUty distribution function (pdf), the shape of which is assumed to be known a priori (1). [Pg.520]

Dispersion In tubes, and particiilarly in packed beds, the flow pattern is disturbed by eddies diose effect is taken into account by a dispersion coefficient in Fick s diffusion law. A PFR has a dispersion coefficient of 0 and a CSTR of oo. Some rough correlations of the Peclet number uL/D in terms of Reynolds and Schmidt numbers are Eqs. (23-47) to (23-49). There is also a relation between the Peclet number and the value of n of the RTD equation, Eq. (7-111). The dispersion model is sometimes said to be an adequate representation of a reaclor with a small deviation from phig ffow, without specifying the magnitude ol small. As a point of superiority to the RTD model, the dispersion model does have the empirical correlations that have been cited and can therefore be used for design purposes within the limits of those correlations. [Pg.705]

There have been many modifications of this idealized model to account for variables such as the freezing rate and the degree of mix-ingin the liquid phase. For example, Burton et al. [J. Chem. Phy.s., 21, 1987 (1953)] reasoned that the solid rejects solute faster than it can diffuse into the bulk liquid. They proposed that the effect of the freezing rate and stirring could be explained hy the diffusion of solute through a stagnant film next to the solid interface. Their theoiy resulted in an expression for an effective distribution coefficient k f which could be used in Eq. (22-2) instead of k. [Pg.1991]

Reference electrodes are used in the measurement of potential [see the explanation to Eq. (2-1)]. A reference electrode is usually a metal/metal ion electrode. The electrolyte surrounding it is in electrolytically conducting contact via a diaphragm with the medium in which the object to be measured is situated. In most cases concentrated or saturated salt solutions are present in reference electrodes so that ions diffuse through the diaphragm into the medium. As a consequence, a diffusion potential arises at the diaphragm that is not taken into account in Eq. (2-1) and represents an error in the potential measurement. It is important that diffusion potentials be as small as possible or the same in the comparison of potential values. Table 3-1 provides information on reference electrodes. [Pg.85]

Vaned diffuser ioss. Vaned diffuser losses are based on conical diffuser test results. They are a function of the impeller blade loading and the vaneless space radius ratio. They also take into account the blade incidence angle and skin friction from the vanes. [Pg.254]

The value of (q) takes into account the precise shape of the pool of stationary phase for a uniform liquid film as in a GC capillary column, q = 2/3. Diffusion in rod shaped and sphere shaped bodies (e.g., paper chromatography and LC) gives q=l/2 and 2/15, respectively [2]. [Pg.255]

Jet interaction should not be taken into account when the jets are closely adjacent to each other, are propagated in confined conditions, and entrainment of the ambient air is restricted. This may be the case for concentrated air supply when air diffusers are uniformly positioned across the wall and the jets are replenished by the reverse flow, which decreases the jet velocity. This effect should be taken into consideration using the confinement coefficient discussed in Section 7.4.5. For the same reason, jet interaction should not be taken into consideration when air is supplied through the ceiling-mounted air diffusers and they are uniformly distributed across the ceiling. [Pg.496]


See other pages where Diffusion into account is mentioned: [Pg.227]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.866]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.2677]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.1467]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.1070]    [Pg.1222]   


SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info