Concentration calculations, general

The values given in this table are only approximate, but they are adequate for process screening purposes with Eqs. (16-24) and (16-25). Rigorous calculations generally require that activity coefficients be accounted for. However, for the exchange between ions of the same valence at solution concentrations of 0.1 N or less, or between any ions at 0.01 N or less, the solution-phase activity coefficients prorated to unit valence will be similar enough that they can be omitted. 

Parametric studies showed that mass diffusion in the gas phase could be neglected under most conditions. The calculations also show that the selection of the hypergolic combination (i.e., the gaseous oxidizer and the propellant system) fixes all of the parameters except the initial temperature and the oxidizer concentration. A general solution of the model shows that the ignition-delay time is approximately rated to the gaseous oxidizer concentration by the relation... 

The equilibrium conversion can be calculated from knowledge of the free energy, together with physical properties to account for vapor and liquid-phase nonidealities. The equilibrium conversion can be changed by appropriate changes to the reactor temperature, pressure and concentration. The general trends for reaction equilibrium are summarized in Figure 6.8. 

Table 2 shows every measured value necessary to calculate the average molweight of silicates in various solutions. It also permits to follow the step by step calculation as detailed in our previous papers [8,9], It was found that, in contrast to the common belief, every dilute alkaline silicate dissociates only partly at the concentrations studied. The AMW, expressed as number of [Si04] tetrahedra per silicate ion in the last column of this table, clearly depends on the type of A+ ions, the A/Si ratios, and the concentration. In general AMW decreases with increasing dilution as one can expect and it is lower in the high A/Si ratio silicates (Kasil 1624 and Star) than in the other silicates at comparable concentrations. 

The electroneutrality condition is almost always used to set the bulk concentration of the species in abundant concentration for which the greatest analytic uncertainty exists. In practice, this component is generally Cl- because most commercial labs, unless instructed otherwise, report a chloride concentration calculated... 

The surface concentrations are generally not known, and may vary with time as the reaction proceeds. One way to circumvent this problem is to work under conditions of controlled convection, so that the surface concentrations can be calculated from the bulk... 

The classical electrochemical methods are based on the simultaneous measurement of current and electrode potential. In simple cases the measured current is proportional to the rate of an electrochemical reaction. However, generally the concentrations of the reacting species at the interface are different from those in the bulk, since they are depleted or accumulated during the course of the reaction. So one must determine the interfacial concentrations. There axe two principal ways of doing this. In the first class of methods one of the two variables, either the potential or the current, is kept constant or varied in a simple manner, the other variable is measured, and the surface concentrations are calculated by solving the transport equations under the conditions applied. In the simplest variant the overpotential or the current is stepped from zero to a constant value the transient of the other variable is recorded and extrapolated back to the time at which the step was applied, when the interfacial concentrations were not yet depleted. In the other class of method the transport of the reacting species is enhanced by convection. If the geometry of the system is sufficiently simple, the mass transport equations can be solved, and the surface concentrations calculated. 

Gifford and Hanna tested their simple box model for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide predictions for annual or seasonal averages against diffusion-model predictions. Their conclusions are summarized in Table 5-3. The correlation coefficient of observed concentrations versus calculated concentrations is generally higher for the simple model than for the detailed model. Hanna calculated reactions over a 6-h period on September 30, 1%9, with his chemically reactive adaptation of the simple dispersion model. He obtained correlation coefficients of observed and calculated concentrations as follows nitric oxide, 0.97 nitrogen dioxide, 0.05 and rhc, 0.55. He found a correlation coefficient of 0.48 of observed ozone concentration with an ozone predictor derived from a simple model, but he pointed out that the local inverse wind speed had a correlation of 0.66 with ozone concentration. He derived a critical wind speed formula to define a speed below which ozone prediction will be a problem with the simple model. Further performance of the simple box model compared with more detailed models is discussed later. 

The membrane phase concentrations are generally calculated from a mass balance equation given as... 

Only three measures of impurity levels, as of concentrations in general, are generally useful the molarity, the molality, and the mole-fraction or mole-percentage. Of these, molality is the least useful, the mole-fraction is rarely appropriate, and the molarity is to be preferred, as it is more informative and easier to use in calculations than the other two. 

In clinical chemistry, interpretation of the data can be quite simple or complex. In the case of MS/MS applications pertaining to a single analyte, all that is needed is the intensity value from the mass of a peak of interest and its internal standard. Viewing of a spectrum is not necessary. For profile methods such as full-scan acylcarni-tines, amino acids, or other compound families, the interpretation is more complex. With multiple related components, calculation of the concentration of many key metabolites is required. The system generally has multiple internal standards, external standards, or both. In addition to the concentration calculations, examination of a profile is often best achieved by viewing the spectra together with the quantitative information. 

Accurate description of the calibration dependence in a theoretical or even semi-empirical way is extremely difficult, perhaps impossible, to achieve. Therefore, the conventional and generally accepted approach is empirical, involving experimental reconstruction of the calibration dependence in the form of a calibration graph. For this purpose, the signals for known concentrations of analyte in standard solutions (i.e., for solutions of known concentrations of analyte) are measured. Then, the signal measured for the analyte in the sample is related to the calibration graph and the analyte concentration calculated. 

The Li concentration in atoms per g was converted to ng g natural Li value and the results are presented in Table 2. The six samples were from three canisters, all of which experienced predominantly thermal fluxes. Two of the canisters (containing samples 30006, 30010, 35031 and 35038) were from below the core with an epithermal flux value twice that of the other canister (samples 30114 and 30115) which was positioned at the side of the core. The calculated Li concentrations are generally consistent for all samples apart from specimen 35031 where the result was affected by contamination with " C. The average value for the predicted natural Li concentration in RPV steel, excluding the result for specimen 35031, was 0.3 0.1 ng g ... 

Chemical Composition. No completely valid generalizations about the composition of SRP wastes can be made because large variations in the composition of both the sludge and the supernate occur from tank to tank, within each tank, and with time. For present purposes, it is sufficient to list the components present and estimate their maximum and average concentrations. The major chemical components of the waste are shown in Table I together with an estimate of their average concentration calculated on the basis that all of the salt is dissolved, and the resulting... 

Most often, the total amount of chloride is used because NaCl is the most common salt. The justification of using it is that the current technology really cannot describe the effect of every single ion on chemical EOR. For example, when HPAM reacts with multivalent metal ions, such as Cr ", and Ti ", in a solution, a weak gel is formed. In this case, we cannot simply use Eq. 5.2 to calculate effective salinity. Equation 5.2 shows that divalents have a larger effect on the effective salinity than monovalents at the same concentration. In general, the order of effect is Mg " > Csl > Na" > The activity of these ions is 10 to 20 kJ/mol, which is much less than the value for chemical reactions (about 200 kJ/mol). Therefore, the salt effect on polymer solution is a reversible electrostatic effect (Niu et al 2006). 

Quantification was based upon the method generally referred to as internal standardisation using, within each isomeric group, one C-labelled isomer as an internal standard. Inevitable differences in chromatographic retention and/or minor differences in ionisation efficiency, mass spectrometric fragmentation and ion masses monitored, lead to differences in sensitivities between the compounds to be determined and the corresponding C-labelled internal standards. These effects were accounted for in the final concentration calculation by the introduction of isomer specific relative sensitivity factors (RSF). Additional details on this procedure are described elsewhere [18,19]. 

---