Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Calculations generality

HyperChein perforins ab initio. SCK calculations generally. It also can calculate the coi relation energy (to he added to the total -SCK energy) hy a post Hartree-Fock procedure call. M P2 that does a Moller-Plesset secon d-order perturbation calculation. I he Ml 2 procedure is on ly available for sin gle poin t calculation s an d on ly produces a single tiuin ber, th e Ml 2 correlation energy, to be added to the total SCF en ergy at th at sin gle poin t con figuration of th e ti iiclei. [Pg.251]

A configuration interaction calculation uses molecular orbitals that have been optimized typically with a Hartree-Fock (FIF) calculation. Generalized valence bond (GVB) and multi-configuration self-consistent field (MCSCF) calculations can also be used as a starting point for a configuration interaction calculation. [Pg.217]

Quantum mechanical calculations generally have only one carbon atom type, compared with the many types of carbon atoms associated with a molecular mechanics force field like AMBER. Therefore, the number of quantum mechanics parameters needed for all possible molecules is much smaller. In principle, very accurate quantum mechanical calculations need no parameters at all, except fundamental constants such as the speed of light, etc. [Pg.215]

Solid Density. SoHds can be characterized by three densities bulk, skeletal, and particle. Bulk density is a measure of the weight of an assemblage of particles divided by the volume the particles occupy. This measurement includes the voids between the particles and the voids within porous particles. The skeletal, or tme soHd density, is the density of the soHd material if it had zero porosity. Fluid-bed calculations generally use the particle... [Pg.70]

The values given in this table are only approximate, but they are adequate for process screening purposes with Eqs. (16-24) and (16-25). Rigorous calculations generally require that activity coefficients be accounted for. However, for the exchange between ions of the same valence at solution concentrations of 0.1 N or less, or between any ions at 0.01 N or less, the solution-phase activity coefficients prorated to unit valence will be similar enough that they can be omitted. [Pg.1506]

The SCRf keyword in the route section of a Gaussian job requests a calcuJation in the presence of a solvent. SCRF calculations generally require an additional input line following the molecule specification section s terminating blank line, having the following form ... [Pg.239]

Model calculations generally support Felkin s hypothesis35-38. However, an additional controlling factor is the stabilization of the transition state by the approach of the nucleophile antiperiplanar to a vicinal bond35. In the transition state for axial attack (Figure 8), the incipient bond is approximately antiperiplanar to two axial C — H bonds. Flattening of the ring improves this antiperiplanarity and, therefore, the more flattened the cyclic ketone, the more axial attack is preferred. [Pg.5]

Experimentally undefined parameters, which have a real physical meaning that is, they reflect an actual physical phenomenon but cannot be determined from the experimental data (even a thought experiment to measure them cannot be conceived) or by a thermodynamic calculation. In isolated cases such parameters can be calculated on the basis of nonthermodynamic models. The equations used for calculations generally contain sums, differences, or other combinations of such parameters that are measurable. The Galvani potential at the interface between two dissimilar conducting phases is an example. [Pg.35]

To summarize, we have systematically tested all possible three- and two-layer ONIOM combinations of high-level QM (HQ=B3LYP/6-31G ), low-level QM (LQ=AM1), and MM (Amber) for the deprotonation energy and structure of a test molecule, an ionic form of a peptide. We find the errors introduced in the ONIOM approximation, in comparison with the target HQ (or HQ HQ HQ) calculation, generally increases in the order ... [Pg.29]

A number of textbooks and review articles are available which provide background and more-general simulation techniques for fluids, beyond the calculations of the present chapter. In particular, the book by Frenkel and Smit [1] has comprehensive coverage of molecular simulation methods for fluids, with some emphasis on algorithms for phase-equilibrium calculations. General review articles on simulation methods and their applications - e.g., [2-6] - are also available. Sections 10.2 and 10.3 of the present chapter were adapted from [6]. The present chapter also reviews examples of the recently developed flat-histogram approaches described in Chap. 3 when applied to phase equilibria. [Pg.354]

FIGURE 7.3 Variation of H202 molecular yield and OH radical yield with track-averaged (LET) according to Kupperman s (1967) calculation. Generally, the experimental values lie somewhat lower than calculated. [Pg.212]

Eq. 17 is meant to represent the possibility for a concerted formation of oxetane product. A problem that always exist in cycloadditions is the question of whether the reaction takes place by a two-step biradical reaction pathway or through a concerted mechanism. Such questions have not even been resolved for purely thermal reactions. 4> A recent speculation on this point proposes almost universal concertedness for all cycloaddition reactions. 79> In that work, mixed stereochemistry in the products of [2+2] cycloaddition reactions is generally attributed to a mixture of two concerted reactions, suprafacial-suprafacial, and supra-facial-antarafacial. It will be seen later that the PMO calculations generally do not support this idea. A mixture of biradical and concerted reactions is in better agreement with experimental facts. [Pg.152]

Co2(CO)q system, reveals that the reactions proceed through mononuclear transition states and intermediates, many of which have established precedents. The major pathway requires neither radical intermediates nor free formaldehyde. The observed rate laws, product distributions, kinetic isotope effects, solvent effects, and thermochemical parameters are accounted for by the proposed mechanistic scheme. Significant support of the proposed scheme at every crucial step is provided by a new type of semi-empirical molecular-orbital calculation which is parameterized via known bond-dissociation energies. The results may serve as a starting point for more detailed calculations. Generalization to other transition-metal catalyzed systems is not yet possible. [Pg.39]

The rotational barriers obtained from pseudo-potential and all-electron calculations generally agree within ca 0.15 kcal mol-1, even when X, Y = Pb. Hence, relativistic effects do not appear to influence the barriers. [Pg.594]

Summarizing this chapter briefly, available calculations generally concern very limited aspects of the solvation of polar molecules. We have to be aware of the fact that much remains to be learnt about the theoretical treatment of associated liquids and liquid mixtures. [Pg.106]

DR. DAVID RORABACHER (Wayne State University) A point which is frequently overlooked is that the calculations generally applied for determining the extent of ion-pair (or outer-sphere complex) formation in substitution reactions may be overly simplistic. There are many types of interactions which tend to perturb the extent of outer-sphere complex formation relative to the purely statistical calculation commonly made which takes into account only the reactant radii and electrostatic factors. [Pg.62]

Abragam and Pryce 126) have calculated general expressions for the quantities g, D, T, and P of Equation (31). A frequently occurring situation is that of axial symmetry such as when the ion is in a CF with tetragonal or trigonal symmetry. In this case the tensors g and T have two components each, parallel and perpendicular to the symmetry axis. T can be characterized in this case by a single value D. Neglecting the last two terms, Equation (31) becomes in this case as follows ... [Pg.89]

The temperature plots presented here are only a small portion of the data collected for heat distribution calculations. Generally, the heating rate Is slow up to 100 C (due to water vapourization) and thereafter becomes faster, on average approaching 0.5°C/mln, and the combustion temperature usually exceeds 1200 C. [Pg.87]

While theoretical calculations generally have been used to supplement experimental findings, they also hold enormous promise for fully discerning the potential energy surfaces of relevant combustion pathways, as well as identifying and exploring the chemistry of relevant reactive intermediates. [Pg.91]


See other pages where Calculations generality is mentioned: [Pg.714]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.1434]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.247]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.219 ]




SEARCH



Atomic Densities, Polarizabilities, and Natural Orbitals Derived from Generalized Sturmian Calculations

Calculating Derivatives of General Functions

Concentration calculations, general

Equilibrium Calculations—A General Approach

Example Calculation of the Gurney Velocity for a General Purpose Bomb

Extension to General Flash Calculations

Flux - calculation/general

General Approaches for Calculating Critical Loads

General Aspects of Quantum Chemistry and Electronic Structure Calculations

General Formulas for Calculating the Number of Normal Vibrations in Each Species

General Perturbation Calculation, for Solutions

General Requirements upon the Methods for Calculating Potential Energy Surfaces

General approaches for calculating critical loads of heavy metals

General equations and schematic approach to calculations

Generalized Sturmians atomic calculations using

Generalized gradient approximation cluster calculations

Generalized valence bond calculations

Hartree-Fock calculations generalization

Molecular mechanics calculations general considerations

Potential energy surfaces, calculation generalized valence bond

© 2024 chempedia.info