Compliance testing exposure

Studies have been conducted on creep compliance tests in which paint films were subjected to tensile loads of 4-7 psi (27.2-47.6 x 10 N/m ) and to 6% ozone for 505 h. A typical result for a high-quality emulsion-base paint is shown in Figure 13-1. Creep compliance is reduced by exposure to 6% ozone. If the effect is linearly related to ozone concentration, we might expect the same reduction in creep compliance at 0.1-ppm ozone in 3 x 10 h, or some 30,(XX) yr. Thus, reduction in creep compliance is not viewed as having a serious ozone contribution. 

When migration limits for substances are set a conventional system is applied to calculate exposure. It is assumed that a 60 kg person will consume 1 kg of packaged food per day. However, a different convention is sometimes necessary for some circumstances. One such arises in the case of lipophilic substances. Lipophilic substances migrate readily into fatty foods. The consumption of fatty foods is usually only 200 g or less per day. For these substances a reduction factor is therefore planned for use in compliance testing, taking into account the lower consumption of fat. 

As part of TSCA, EPA can require the testing of any chemical if there is the possibiUty of an unreasonable risk to health or environment or if there is significant human or environmental exposure. If the substance poses an unreasonable risk, EPA can prohibit the manufacture, processing, or distribution of the substance limit the amount of the substance that can be manufactured, processed, or distributed prohibit a particular use for the substance limit the concentration of the substance during manufacture, processing, or distribution regulate disposal methods for the substance and require manufacturers to maintain records of process and to conduct tests to assure compliance with EPA rules. 

The toxicity requirements are established per type of industry, in terms of the maximum number of times the effluents needs to be diluted to produce a no observed effect concentration (NOEC), defined as Gf for fish, Gd for daphnia, Ga for algae, and G1 for luminescent bacteria. Testing is limited to the exposure to only the appropriate Gx level, which should not produce any observed effect [the G-value corresponds with the dilution of the effluent, expressed as the lowest dilution factor (1,2,4,...) causing less than 10% mortality]. The level of maximum allowable toxicity per industrial branch is based on the level that is considered to be attainable with state-of-the-art process and/or treatment technology. Violating the toxicity requirements results in a levy, which makes state-of-the-art compliance a more economic option [12]. 

In Ireland, compliance with toxicity limits for selected industries is ascertained by annual or biannual test on representative samples of effluent. The test species most commonly used is the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Control authorities normally require results from 96-hour tests. The toxicity values are expressed as the minimum acceptable proportion of effluent (as a percentage) in a test resulting in 50% fish mortality after 96 hours of exposure. The toxic units (TU) are defined as the maximum number of times an effluent may be diluted to produce the test criteria (TU = 100/96-hour LC50, with LC50 expressed as the percentage of effluent in the test) (Fig. 5). 

Occupational medical records should record and document occupationally related medical information of all types (e.g., medical examinations, visits to medical facilities [even for nonoccupational reasons], clinical laboratory data, injuries, pulmonary function tests, audiograms, etc.). The period of time that records must be retained is specified by law depending on the type of data and the health-related agent(s) of concern. In most cases, OSHA requires that information be retained for at least 30 years after the termination of employment (OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1910.1020 Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records). Medical records should be kept in compliance with the OSHA... 

Validated food analysis methods are used for compliance with food legislation in the internal EU market and global trade. They serve likewise to detect fraud, to test for the authenticity of specifically labelled food products and to monitor specific substances for exposure assessment (e.g. EU pesticides programme). 

Typically, selection of the major test end-point to be used in the investigation is based on the compliance needs or the objective of the investigation. For acute exposures, survival is often the end-point selected for performance of the toxicity assessment. Although chronic exposures often use survival, growth expressed as dry weight, or some measure of reproductive potential (i.e. fecundity, offspring production) is the major test end-point. Survival of the test organisms (expressed... 

Respiratory function tests should be conducted before exposure and, at least, after the final exposure and at the end of a recovery period. Components that may be studied include compliance, total lung capacity, functional residual capacity, forced vital capacity, resistance, and CO diffusing capacity (Harkema et al., 1982 Sun et al., 1987). 

Level 2 In the second level (Level 2), physico-chemical speciation models are introduced in order to correct the toxicity data for chemical availability. Indeed, NOEC and/or ECm values that are used in the effects assessment are generally generated in test media with varying physico-chemical characteristics (e.g. pH, hardness, DOC) known to alter metal availability and toxicity. In case metal concentrations are reported and appropriate speciation models (e.g. WHAM, MINTEQA2, etc.) and relevant input data (i.e. main physico-chemical parameters driving the availability of a metal such as pH, DOC, etc.) are available, NOEC and/or ECm values should be expressed on the basis of the metal species of concern in order to reduce uncertainty. Eor regulatory compliance purposes, the dissolved exposure concentrations should also be translated at the same level of availability (expressed in the same units) as the effects assessment. 

---