Sulfur coals, low

Environmental Effects of Ethanol Production. Production of ethanol could potentially produce two forms of air pollution the release of pollutants from the boiler used to produce process steam, and vaporization of ethanol during the production process. If crop residues or lower grade fuels such as coal (low sulfur) are used as boiler fuel, which is preferable from a net energy gain basis, the resulting pollutants may be controlled through use of flue gas stack scrubbers. The release of ethanol vapors at the plant site is not considered a major concern at this time. 

The transportation of product to the user is a widely variable cost element. A power plant located at the minehead-processing plant site would have eflFectively no transportation cost. Rail transport of solid product would probably experience the same costs as coal itself (2). This can be estimated in lieu of specific foreknowledge of rail rate schedules through 1990 as per ton-mile. As an example of current costs to ship coal, low sulfur Western coal was shipped recently to New Jersey for utility use at a cost of 22 per ton, which corresponds closely to per ton-mile. 

R. P. Janoso, "Baghouse Dust Collectors on a Low Sulfur Coal Eired Utihty Boiler," Preprint 74-101, 67th APCA Annual Meeting Denver, Col, June... 

A significant issue in combustors in the mid-1990s is the performance of the process in an environmentally acceptable manner through the use of either low sulfur coal or post-combustion clean-up of the flue gases. Thus there is a marked trend to more efficient methods of coal combustion and, in fact, a combustion system that is able to accept coal without the necessity of a post-combustion treatment or without emitting objectionable amounts of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulates is very desirable (51,52). 

Properties. The properties of char products from two possible coal feeds, a low sulfur Western coal, and a high sulfur Midwestern coal, are shown in Table 11. The char derived from the low sulfur Western coal may be direcdy suitable as plant fuel, with only minor addition of clean process gas to stabilize its combustion. Elue gas desulfurization may not be required. Elue gas from the combustion of the char derived from the high sulfur Illinois coal, however, requires desulfurization before it may be discharged into the atmosphere. 

Furthermore, 60—100 L (14—24 gal) oil, having sulfur content below 0.4 wt %, could be recovered per metric ton coal from pyrolysis at 427—517°C. The recovered oil was suitable as low sulfur fuel. Figure 15 is a flow sheet of the Rocky Flats pilot plant. Coal is fed from hoppers to a dilute-phase, fluid-bed preheater and transported to a pyrolysis dmm, where it is contacted by hot ceramic balls. Pyrolysis dmm effluent is passed over a trommel screen that permits char product to fall through. Product char is thereafter cooled and sent to storage. The ceramic balls are recycled and pyrolysis vapors are condensed and fractionated. 

The volatiles contents of product chars decreased from ca 25—16% with temperature. Char (lower) heating values, on the other hand, increased from ca 26.75 MJ /kg (11,500 Btu/lb) to 29.5 MJ /kg (12,700 Btu/lb) with temperature. Chars in this range of heating values are suitable for boiler fuel apphcation and the low sulfur content (about equal to that of the starting coal) permits direct combustion. These char products, however, are pyrophoric and require special handling in storage and transportation systems. 

In the United States and increasingly in other parts of the world, environmental regulations prohibit the combustion of all but very low sulfur-content coals without sulfur oxide emission controls. The cost of installing sulfur oxide control equipment together with concern about equipment rehabihty have led to the shipment of the lower rank low sulfur coals from up to 1600 km away from the mining site. 

North America.. In the United States, lignite deposits are located in the northern Great Plains and in the Gulf states. Subbituminous coal is found along the Rocky Mountains. The western half of North Dakota has about 74% of the nation s resources, Montana 23%, Texas 2%, and Alabama and South Dakota about 0.5% each. The lignite resources to 914 m represent 28% of the total toimage of all coal deposits in the United States. The lower cost and low sulfur content have contributed to rapid growth in production. 

The lignitic coals of the northern United States tend to have low sulfur contents, making them attractive for boilet fuels to meet sulfur-emission standards. However, low sulfur content coals have impaired the performance of electrostatic precipitators. The ash of these coals tends to be high in alkaline earths (Ca, Mg) and alkaUes (Na, K). As a result, the ash can trap sulfur as sulfites and sulfates (see Airpollution control methods). 

Because of its low sulfur content, lignite is becoming mote important. The U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 have resulted in economic premiums fotlow sulfur coal corresponding to 10/t for emission allowances at 500/t of SO2 (32). 

Fig. 9. Measured coal-fired flow faciUty (CFFF) NO emissions where ( ) represents high sulfur coal, (e) low sulfur coal, (A) low sulfur coal having K2/S = 1.15, and ( ) LMF5-G. A, Illinois No. 6 coal (3% S) B, Montana Rosebud coal (1% S), and the NSPS range is between the dotted lines. To...

Emissions control systems play an important role at most coal-fired power plants. For example, PC-fired plants sited in the United States require some type of sulfur dioxide control system to meet the regulations set forth in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, unless the boiler bums low sulfur coal or benefits from offsets from other highly controlled boilers within a given utiUty system. Flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) is most commonly accomphshed by the appHcation of either dry- or wet-limestone systems. Wet FGD systems, also referred to as wet scmbbers, are the most effective solution for large faciUties. Modem scmbbers can typically produce a saleable waUboard-quaUty gypsum as a by-product of the SO2 control process (see SULFURREMOVAL AND RECOVERY). 

Other burners are used for low capacity operations. A cascade or checker burner, ia which molten sulfur flows down through brick checkerwork countercurrent to a flow of air, is used ia small units with a sulfur trioxide converter to condition gases entering electrostatic precipitators at boiler plants operating on low sulfur coal. A small pan burner, which is fed with soHd, low carbon sulfur, is used to produce sulfur dioxide for solution ia irrigation water to control the pH and maintain porosity ia the soil. The same type of burner is used to disiafect wastewater ia this case sulfur dioxide is used iastead of chlorine. 

In magnesium casting, sulfur dioxide is employed as an inert blanketing gas. Another foundry appHcation is as a rapid curing catalyst for furfuryl resins in cores. Surprisingly, in view of the many efforts to remove sulfur dioxide from flue gases, there are situations where sulfur dioxide is deHberately introduced. In power plants burning low sulfur coal and where particulate stack emissions are a problem, a controUed amount of sulfur dioxide injection improves particulate removal. 

The H-Coal process could operate in one of two modes, depending on the desired product slate. In the "syn-cmde" mode, a fluid-bed coking unit was employed to maximize recovery of distillate from the Hquefaction product (Fig. 7a). When operated in the fuel oil mode (Fig. 7b), no coker was used and the primary product was a coal-derived low sulfur fuel oil. Total hydrogen demand on the process was also reduced in the latter mode of operation. 

Fig. 7. H-Coal process using Illinois No. 6 coal (a) in syncmde mode, and (b) in low sulfur fuel oil mode. To convert to Btu, multiply by 6.48 x lO ". To convert m to bbl, multiply by 6.29. To convert m to standard cubic feet (SCF), multiply by 35.3...

Sulfur dioxide reduction to achieve required emission levels may be accomplished by switching to lower-sulfur fuels. Use of low-sulfur coal or oil, or even biomass such as wood residue as a fuel, may be less expensive than installing an SO2 control system after the process. This is particularly true in the wood products industry, where wood residue is often available at a relatively low cost. 

Fabric filters are useful for collecting particles with resistivities either too low or too high for collection with electrostatic precipitators. Fabric filters therefore may be good candidates for collecting fly ash from low-sulfur coals or fly ash containing high unburned carbon levels, which respectively have high and low resistivities, and thus are relatively difficult to collect with electrostatic precipitators. 

---