Chemicals risk assessment methodologies

Batiha MA, Kadhum AAH, Batiha MM et al (2010) MAFRAM — a new fate and risk assessment methodology for non-volatile organic chemicals. J Hazard Mater 181 1080-1087... 

Hertz-Picciotto I, Hu SW (1995) Contribution of cadmium in cigarettes to lung cancer An evaluation of risk assessment methodologies. Lung Cancer 12 116-116 Hickman JC (2000) Tetrachloroethylene. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Available at http //www.mrw.interscience.wrley.com/emrw/9780471238966/kirk/article/ tetrhick.aO 1 /current/pdf... 

Fortunately, well-developed methods exist for assessing the risks posed by chemicals to humans and the environment. The focus of this book is on the description of the existing risk assessment methodologies for human health. New developments in these methodologies will also be described. Throughout the book, the emphasis will be on international harmonization, and the application of test methods and guidance documents developed by international expert groups. The book only... 

Seed, J., R.P. Brown, S.S. Olin, and J.A. Foran. 1995. Chemical mixtures Current risk assessment methodologies and future directions. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 22 76-94. 

In 1958, in response to the increased awareness that chemicals can cause cancer, the US Congress passed the Delaney clause, which prohibited the addition to the food supply of any substance known to cause cancer in animals or humans. Compared with today s standards, the analytical methods to detect a potentially harmful substance were very poor. As the analytical methods improved, it became apparent that the food supply had low levels of substances that were known to cause cancer in either animals or humans. The obvious question was Is a small amount of a substance safe to consume. This question in turn raised many others about how to interpret data or extrapolate data to very low doses. The 1970s saw a flourishing of activity to develop and refine risk assessment methodologies. 

A hypothetical example of the application of the methodology follows in Table 5.9. The relevant data from chemical risk assessments and socio-economic analyses are entered into three columns corresponding to hazard, exposure and social mobilisation. For each of the two substances, the first row characterises the relevant scenarios according to the regulatory action indicators from Table 5.7. The second row, which is shaded in grey, then describes the key parameters that influence the probabilities associated with each action indicator. The corresponding ratings for the action indicators and the probability of occurrence indicators are presented in bold italics. 

The history of health and safety regulation reflects a continuing evolution of assessment of health risks from the chemicals in our environment — whether those chemicals are in food, drugs, other consumer products, the workplace, or the air that we breath and the water that we drink. As science has become more refined, so has safety/risk assessment. Regulators throughout history have used the best form of safety/risk assessment available at any particular time, but no one has ever believed, or believes now, that an adequate safety/risk assessment methodology has been found. In this field, as in most other fields of scientific endeavor, there is still a great deal to be learned. 

However, since the chemical composition of the neutralents produced by the destruction of different types of munitions could vary substantially, a number of representative neutralents would have to be subjected to toxicity tests in order to accurately predict hazards to humans and the environment Because the time and cost of such an endeavor would be prohibitive and would strongly reduce the likelihood of meeting the CWC s 2007 deadline, toxicity tests on the neutralents generated by EDS would not be practical, and toxicity estimates should instead be based on the most complete chemical analyses possible using standard EPA risk assessment methodologies. 

Ahmad, M. Pontiggia, M. Demichela, M. 2014. Human and organizational factor risk assessment in process industry and a risk assessment methodology (MEDIA) to incorporate human and organizational factors. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 36, 565-570 D01 10.3303/CET1436095. 

A probabilistic risk assessment methodology for landfills, with particular reference to the representation of chemical containment... 

The third category of methods addressed in this chapter are error analysis and reduction methodologies. Error analysis techniques can either be applied in a proactive or retrospective mode. In the proactive mode they are used to predict possible errors when tasks are being analyzed during chemical process quantitative risk assessment and design evaluations. When applied retrospectively, they are used to identify the underlying causes of errors giving rise to accidents. Very often the distinction between task analysis and error analysis is blurred, since the process of error analysis always has to proceed from a comprehensive description of a task, usually derived from a task analysis. 

D. Hendershot, "A Simple Example Problem Illustrating tlie Methodology of Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Assessment," paper presented at AICliE Mid-Atlantic Region "Day in Industry" for Chemical Engineering Faculty, Apr. 15, 1988. 

These challenges are critical to the profession of chemical engineering, the chemical industry, and our country. Risk assessment and management involve input from a multitude of different disciplines. The methodology is rapidly changing and extremely complex and reqrrires both technical input and input from professionals with expertise in legal, economic, judicial, medical, regrrlatory, and public perception issues. 

Professor Martel s book addresses specifically some of the more technical eispects of the risk assessment process, mainly in the areas of hazard identification, and of the consequence/effect analysis elements, of the overall analysis whilst where appropriate setting these aspects in the wider context. The book brings together a substantial corpus of information, drawn from a number of sources, about the toxic, flammable and explosive properties and effect (ie harm) characteristics of a wide range of chemical substances likely to be found in industry eind in the laboratory, and also addresses a spectrum of dangerous reactions of, or between, such substances which may be encountered. This approach follows the classical methodology and procedures of hazard identification, analysing material properties eind... 

The analysis of chemical risk is a process comprising the following elements hazard identification, exposure assessment, dose-response assessment, and risk characterization [6]. Figure 1 shows the main elements that constitute the risk characterization process together the methodologies used for their determination. The essence of risk characterization is to relate the exposure (the concentration of a... 

Additionally, the integration of geographic information system (GIS) with analytical data is an effective procedure in addressing the problem of spatial and temporal variability of the different parameters involved in the environmental fate of chemicals. Based on accurate local estimations, GIS-based models would then also allow deriving realistic and representative spatially averaged regional PECs. Table 4 shows some studies that have used GIS-based methodologies to perform a site-specific risk assessment of PECs in different exposed ecosystems. 

---