Tafel analysis

It is shown in Chapter 3 that a simple kinetic model of half-cell reactions leads to Tafel equations in which the overpotentials (r ) or polarizations of the oxidation and reduction components of a half-cell reaction are linearly dependent on the logarithm of the oxidation and reduction currents (Iox and Ired), respectively, or 

Although the primary objective of Tafel analysis based on experimental measurements is the determination of the corrosion current density, icorr, the measurements also can give values for the cathodic and anodic Tafel constants, Pred x and Pox M, and estimates of the exchange current densities, i0 x and i0 M. The values of these parameters can provide information on the kinetic mechanisms of the electrochemical reactions, 

Tafel Extrapolation. The most fundamental procedure for experimentally evaluating Icorr is by Tafel extrapolation. This method requires the presence of a linear or Tafel section in the E versus log Iex curve. A potential scan of 300 mV about Ecorr is generally required to determine whether a linear section of at least one decade of current is present such that a reasonably accurate extrapolation can be made to the Ecorr potential. Such linear sections are illustrated for the cathodic polarization curves in Fig. 6.2 to 6.5. The current value at the Ecorr intersection is the corrosion current, Icorr, as shown in Fig. 6.10. Assuming uniform corrosion, the corrosion current density is obtained by dividing Icorr by the specimen area (i.e., icorr = Icorr/A). Anodic polarization curves are not often used in this method because of the absence of linear regions over 

Note M, g/mol m, oxidation state or valence p, g/cm3 i, mA/m2 and mpy, mils (0.001 in.) per year. Far alloys, use atomic-fraction-weighted values for M, m, and p. This procedure assumes nonselective corrosion of the elemental constituents of the alloy. 

The time required to determine Icorr by Tafel extrapolation is approximately 3 h, which corresponds to the approximate time required for experimental setup and generation of a cathodic polarization curve at a commonly employed, slow scan rate of 600 mV/h. In comparison, a comparable gravimetric evaluation (mass-loss measurement) on a corrosion-resistant metal or alloy could take months, or longer. A limitation of the Tafel extrapolation method is the rather large potential excursion away from Ecorr, which tends to modify the WE surface, such that if the measurement is to be repeated, the sample should be re-prepared following initial procedures and again allowed to stabilize in the electrolyte until a steady-state Ecorr is reached. Consequently, the Tafel extrapolation method is not amenable to studies requiring faster, or even continuous, measurements of Icorr. 

---

With both approaches, it is key to establish the current regions where samples are under kinetic control to allow the correct comparison. Many reported comparisons of catalysfs in MEA sfrucfures point to differences in performance, which are attributed to intrinsic catalyst differences when it is clear that differences are due to mass fransport effects because of catalyst layer structure. To help overcome these difficulties, it is recommended that, for catalyst evaluation, pure reactants be used (e.g., O2 instead of air) and at relatively high stoichiometries. Use of current-voltage curves should be corrected for elecfrolyte or membrane resistances and Tafel analysis used to identify fhe kinefically confrolled current regions. 

For solving mixtures of copper products, parameters derived from Tafel analysis of voltammetric curves were used [127, 133, 183]. The use of this formalism requires (i) that electrochemical processes for individual analytes can be taken as independent, and (ii) strong overlapping of voltammetric curves. Both conditions apply in our studied samples because these systems can be taken as constituted by separated micro- or nanograins of different solid compounds. Tafel analysis is based on the assumption that the rising portion of voltammetric curves can, in general, be... 

This similarity makes it difficult to use pattern recognition criteria described in the precedent section because the involved parameters are not additive for mixtures of compounds, so that Tafel analysis of the rising portion of voltammetric curves offers a plausible alternative for resolution of mixtures. This is prompted by the fact that the values of SL and 00 fell in well-separated regions in two dimensional diagrams, as shown in Fig. 3.12. 

An example of the application of Tafel analysis is provided by samples taken for a bronze montefortino helmet from the Gabriel river valley (Kelin and Ikalesken period) in the Valencian region of Requena, dated back to the Second Iron Age (see Fig. 3.13). Upon attachment to paraffin-impregnated graphite electrodes immersed in 0.50 M phosphate buffer, voltammetric signals such as depicted in Fig. 3.14 were found [183]. 

Relative quantitation can also be obtained from voltammetric data in the case of strongly overlapped peaks using generalized Tafel analysis of the rising portion of voltammetric curves. For quantitation of a mixture of two components, X and Y, one can combine the Tafel dependence for individual components ... 

Tafel analysis of these mixtures indicated that pigmenting samples consisted of pure azurite, pure smalt, and azurite plus smalt mixtures, concentrated in smalt molar percentages of 55%, 72%, and 85%. This can be seen in Fig. 4.11, where a frequency diagram illustrative of the use of selected azurite/smalt dosages is presented. 

Domenech A, Domenech-Carbo MT, Edwards HGM (2008) Quantitation from Tafel analysis in solid-state voltammetry. Application to the study of cobalt and copper pigments in severely damaged frescoes. Anal Chem 80 2704-2716. 

Mishra, D. and Farrell, J. (2005) Understanding nitrate reactions with zerovalent iron using tafel analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 645-650. 

Tafel analysis of voltammetric curves (see Chapter 3) allows us to attribute the electrocatalytic process at -eO.92 V to the formation of relatively strong vanadium-glucose adducts, whereas the electrocatalytic process at -1-1.15 V involves the oxidation of glucose molecules located at the outer Helmholtz plane. The catalytic pathway can be described on assuming that the electrochemical process is initiated by the formation of vanadium-glucose surface-confined complexes ... 

Fig. 25. Tafel analysis of current-voltage curve obtained for the reduction of fluorescein at the Compton-Waller cell.

Potentiodynamic polarization (LSV and Tafel analysis) Measurement of corrosion parameters fcom lg> g> i p). Additive effects (passivation or stimulation of anodic and cathodic reactions), mass transfer limited effects material removal in ECMP Kallingal et al. (1998), Jiang et al. (2014), Aksu et al. (2003), ASTM (2004)... 

Fig. 4.13 - Experimental data for the study of Fe(CN)5 /Fe(CN)6 couple in KCl (0.5 mol dm ). Cq = c r = 10mmoldm . Au electrode (a) I-E curves as a function of rotation rates, (b) vs plots (cu = 27t/) at a series of potentials, o reduction, x oxidation, (c) Tafel analysis of kinetic currents, i.e. the log of the inverse of the intercepts of (b) vs potential. uncorrected data. X data corrected for back reaction.

Survila, A. and Stasiukaitis, P.V. (1997) Partial currents of consecutive charge transfer in the processes of metal electrodeposition. Chemija, 3, 31-35. Streeter, I. and Compton, R.G. (2007) Mass transport corrected Tafel analysis of voltammetric waves when can it be applied Electrochim. Acta, 52 (13), 4305 -4311. 

A myriad of experimental studies have explored the impact of size and shape of catalyst nanoparticles as well as of substrate properties on (Wieckowski et al., 2003). Predictive relations between particle size and activity are, however, difficult to be established, since the size of particles affects electronic and geometric properties at their surface. The advantage of using for catalyst evaluation, is that it can be obtained from ex situ Tafel analysis conducted under reproducible conditions. As a result of changes in the reaction pathway with potential, y must be found for the potential region of interest. 

Tafel Analysis Electrochemically Reversible Processes Problem... 

Fig. 2.3 The cyclic voltammetric response for an irreversible one-electron reduction process, with the region required for Tafel analysis highlighted. The inset shows the Tafel plot for the forward scan highlighted is the required linear region. The voltage scan starts at 0.0 V and sweeps negativelyto —0.5 Vbefore returningto 0.0 V (small arrows indicate scan direction).

Tafel Analysis Mass Transport Correction Problem... 

Problem 2.6 demonstrated that for the Tafel analysis of a multi-electron system we expect to measure a gradient which is proportional to n + otrosj where n is the number of electrons transferred prior to the rate-determining step and ctros is the transfer coefficient for the rate-determining step, note that if all electron transfers are reversible and highly driven then the gradient is proportional to n (the number of electrons). 

Tafel analysis of the voltammetric wave will provide the same information. From Problems 2.3 and 2.4, we know that for a one-electron irreversible wave, Tafel analysis yields a line of gradient equal to aP/RT, whereas for a reversible one-electron wave the gradient is equal to F/RT, such that the exponential portion (Tafel region) of the voltammogram is steeper in the reversible case. 

Figure 31.1 shows a classic electrochemically measured Tafel polarization diagram [33. The Tafel analysis is performed by extrapolating the linear portions of both cathodic and anodic curves on a log (current) versus potential plot to their point of intersection. This intersection point provides both the corrosion potential con and the corrosion current density for the system unperturbed. This is a very simple yet powerful technique for quantitatively characterizing a corrosion process. The Tafel equation can be simplified to provide Eq. (7) by approximation using a power series expansion. 

A major thrust in recent years has been to electrodeposit cerium oxide onto various substrates for corrosion protection. Successful deposition of cerium oxide has been accomplished on surfaces such steels [77-79], zinc [15,80], aluminum [81], and nickel superaUoys [82,83]. Linear polarization and tafel analysis were applied to test the corrosion protection effect of the as-deposited cerium oxide-oriented films [1]. The corrosion current decreased from 7.94 x 10 for the substrate to 7.59 x 10 A cm for the Ce02 film coated substrate in a 0.1 M NaCl solution. Film coated substrate in a 0.1 M NaCl increased from 2.63 x lO for the substrate to 6.69 x 10 0 cm for the Ce02 film showing increased corrosion protection for the coating. 

---