Methanol reaction with carbon monoxide

The mechanism is well understood, involving complexation of the rhodium with iodine and carbon monoxide, reaction with methyl iodide (formed from the methanol with hydrogen iodide), insertion of CO in the rhodium-carbon bond, and hydrolysis to give product with regeneration of the complex and more hydrogen iodide. 

Dichlorotetracarbonyldirhodium has been obtained by the action of carbon monoxide at high temperature and pressure on a mixture of anhydrous rhodium(III) chloride and finely divided copper powder and by reaction of rhodium(III) chloride 3-hydrate with carbon monoxide saturated with methanol at moderate temperatures and atmospheric pressure. The preparation described here is a modification of the latter method, without use of methanol. This procedure is considerably simpler than the recently described preparation which involves adsorption of rhodium chloride on silica gel, chlorination, and subsequent carbonylation. ... 

Table 5 contains AfH and A, Gy for carbon monoxide, hydrogen and methanol at various temperatures and direct substitution into eqns. (10) and (22) leads to values of AH and AGy for reaction (38). Table 6 shows the results of these calculations, together with values of the equilibrium constant obtained using eqn. (28). 

Hydrogen is also used for a number of similar reactions. For example, it can be combined with carbon monoxide to make methanol—methyl alcohol, or wood alcohol (CH3OH) ... 

A slurry phase concurrent synthesis of methanol using a potassium meth-oxide/copper chromite mixed catalyst has been developed. This process operates under relatively mild conditions such as temperatures of 100-180°C and pressures of 30-65 atm. The reaction pathway involves a homogeneous carbonylation of methanol to methyl formate followed by the heterogeneous hydrogenolysis of methyl formate to two molecules of methanol, the net result being the reaction of hydrogen with carbon monoxide to give methanol via methyl formate ... 

Two model reactions were applied to characterize the catalytic behavior of the zeolite-incorporated metal oxides carbon monoxide oxidation and methanol conversion. As is clear from what follows, the catalytic activity turned out to be the most sensitive properties toward the minor changes in a catalysts "biography". Therefore, some disagreements may rise on comparing the activity of supposedly similar samples with the same composition but of different preparation history. 

Although these humble origins make interesting historical notes m most cases the large scale preparation of carboxylic acids relies on chemical synthesis Virtually none of the 3 X 10 lb of acetic acid produced m the United States each year is obtained from vinegar Instead most industrial acetic acid comes from the reaction of methanol with carbon monoxide... 

About half of the wodd production comes from methanol carbonylation and about one-third from acetaldehyde oxidation. Another tenth of the wodd capacity can be attributed to butane—naphtha Hquid-phase oxidation. Appreciable quantities of acetic acid are recovered from reactions involving peracetic acid. Precise statistics on acetic acid production are compHcated by recycling of acid from cellulose acetate and poly(vinyl alcohol) production. Acetic acid that is by-product from peracetic acid [79-21-0] is normally designated as virgin acid, yet acid from hydrolysis of cellulose acetate or poly(vinyl acetate) is designated recycle acid. Indeterrninate quantities of acetic acid are coproduced with acetic anhydride from coal-based carbon monoxide and unknown amounts are bartered or exchanged between corporations as a device to lessen transport costs. 

The unit has virtually the same flow sheet (see Fig. 2) as that of methanol carbonylation to acetic acid (qv). Any water present in the methyl acetate feed is destroyed by recycle anhydride. Water impairs the catalyst. Carbonylation occurs in a sparged reactor, fitted with baffles to diminish entrainment of the catalyst-rich Hquid. Carbon monoxide is introduced at about 15—18 MPa from centrifugal, multistage compressors. Gaseous dimethyl ether from the reactor is recycled with the CO and occasional injections of methyl iodide and methyl acetate may be introduced. Near the end of the life of a catalyst charge, additional rhodium chloride, with or without a ligand, can be put into the system to increase anhydride production based on net noble metal introduced. The reaction is exothermic, thus no heat need be added and surplus heat can be recovered as low pressure steam. 

Between 50 and 60% of the formaldehyde is formed by the exothermic reaction (eq. 23) and the remainder by endothermic reaction (eq. 24) with the net result of a reaction exotherm. Carbon monoxide and dioxide, methyl formate, and formic acid are by-products. In addition, there are also physical losses, hquid-phase reactions, and small quantities of methanol in the product, resulting in an overall plant yield of 86—90% (based on methanol). 

Even though form amide was synthesized as early as 1863 by W. A. Hoffmann from ethyl formate [109-94-4] and ammonia, it only became accessible on a large scale, and thus iadustrially important, after development of high pressure production technology. In the 1990s, form amide is mainly manufactured either by direct synthesis from carbon monoxide and ammonia, or more importandy ia a two-stage process by reaction of methyl formate (from carbon monoxide and methanol) with ammonia. 

The reaction is mn for several hours at temperatures typically below 100°C under a pressure of carbon monoxide to minimise formamide decomposition (73). Conversions of a-hydroxyisobutyramide are near 65% with selectivities to methyl a-hydroxyisobutyrate and formamide in excess of 99%. It is this step that is responsible for the elimination of the acid sludge stream characteristic of the conventional H2SO4—ACH processes. Because methyl formate, and not methanol, is used as the methylating agent, formamide is the co-product instead of ammonium sulfate. Formamide can be dehydrated to recover HCN for recycle to ACH generation. 

The reaction of methyl propionate and formaldehyde in the gas phase proceeds with reasonable selectivity to MMA and MAA (ca 90%), but with conversions of only 30%. A variety of catalysts such as V—Sb on siUca-alumina (109), P—Zr, Al, boron oxide (110), and supported Fe—P (111) have been used. Methjial (dimethoxymethane) or methanol itself may be used in place of formaldehyde and often result in improved yields. Methyl propionate may be prepared in excellent yield by the reaction of ethylene and carbon monoxide in methanol over a mthenium acetylacetonate catalyst or by utilizing a palladium—phosphine ligand catalyst (112,113). 

Because the synthesis reactions are exothermic with a net decrease in molar volume, equiUbrium conversions of the carbon oxides to methanol by reactions 1 and 2 are favored by high pressure and low temperature, as shown for the indicated reformed natural gas composition in Figure 1. The mechanism of methanol synthesis on the copper—zinc—alumina catalyst was elucidated as recentiy as 1990 (7). For a pure H2—CO mixture, carbon monoxide is adsorbed on the copper surface where it is hydrogenated to methanol. When CO2 is added to the reacting mixture, the copper surface becomes partially covered by adsorbed oxygen by the reaction C02 CO + O (ads). This results in a change in mechanism where CO reacts with the adsorbed oxygen to form CO2, which becomes the primary source of carbon for methanol. 

Only recently has a mechanism been proposed for the copper-cataly2ed reaction that is completely satisfactory (58). It had been known for many years that a small amount of carbon dioxide in the feed to the reactor is necessary for optimum yield, but most workers in the field beHeved that the main reaction in the formation of methanol was the hydrogenation of carbon monoxide. Now, convincing evidence has been assembled to indicate that methanol is actually formed with >99% selectivity by the reaction of dissociated, adsorbed hydrogen and carbon dioxide on the metallic copper surface in two steps ... 

Thermal chlorination of methane was first put on an industrial scale by Hoechst in Germany in 1923. At that time, high pressure methanol synthesis from hydrogen and carbon monoxide provided a new source of methanol for production of methyl chloride by reaction with hydrogen chloride. Prior to 1914 attempts were made to estabHsh an industrial process for methanol by hydrolysis of methyl chloride obtained by chlorinating methane. 

At 180°C, reaction with water results in formic acid, methyl chloride, methanol, hydrochloric acid, and some carbon monoxide. 

A Belgian patent (178) claims improved ethanol selectivity of over 62%, starting with methanol and synthesis gas and using a cobalt catalyst with a hahde promoter and a tertiary phosphine. At 195°C, and initial carbon monoxide pressure of 7.1 MPa (70 atm) and hydrogen pressure of 7.1 MPa, methanol conversions of 30% were indicated, but the selectivity for acetic acid and methyl acetate, usehil by-products from this reaction, was only 7%. Ruthenium and osmium catalysts (179,180) have also been employed for this reaction. The addition of a bicycHc trialkyl phosphine is claimed to increase methanol conversion from 24% to 89% (181). 

---